The only hope for us matte lovers

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by Michael CM1, Oct 14, 2008.

  1. Michael CM1
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    #1
    The iPhone has a glossy screen, but Power Support had screen covers from day one that were both glossy and "anti-glare" for $15. Hopefully, they can do the same for iMacs and MacBooks, although I can imagine the nightmare of putting such a cover on a 15" MBP screen, let alone the iMac.

    Couldn't Apple make a killing by just charging us $50 to do this as a BTO type thing?
     
  2. Anaxarxes
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Location:
    Istanbul, Turkey
    #2
    They already have.

    http://www.powersupportusa.com/products/ef.php?category=mb
     
  3. wgilles
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    wgilles

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2008
    #3
    I just find it weird that they don't even give the option anymore
     
  4. iShater
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 604

    iShater

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2002
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    #4
    What better way to save $$ on their end, while we shell out $50 or so to "remedy" it?
     
  5. larval
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2008
    #5
  6. Michael CM1
    Expand Collapse
    thread starter macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2008
    #6
    I would like to give a massive YOU EFFIN' ROCK to Anaxarxes. They also have one "coming soon" for the iMac. My prayers have been answered! The only problem I see is I don't know where to find a credit card big enough to flap that thing down with. :)
     
  7. rdowns
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #7
    Matte screen, matte screen, wah, wah, wah

    The bottom line is that if there were sufficient demand, Apple would still be offering them.
     
  8. WilliamG
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2008
    Location:
    Seattle
    #8
    Eh? What kind of logic is that? I'd wager most MBPs sold in the last few years were indeed matte! That was the only one carried by e.g. Best Buy, that's for sure.
     
  9. TwinCities Dan
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    TwinCities Dan

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Location:
    Double Parked out front of the Courthouse
    #9
    Very true.

    Untrue.
     
  10. Mactagonist
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    Location:
    NYC - Manhattan
    #10
    No. Just no. Glossy was a far, far better seller.
     
  11. rdowns
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #11
    It's called business logic and not the crazy rantings from forums such as these. If Apple sold mostly matte screens, they'd still be offering them. People who post on forums are hardly representative of Apple's market.
     
  12. RHD
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2008
    Location:
    London
    #12
    Everyone I know (which is quite a few people) who work on laptops all day have matte screens.
     
  13. TESEV
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    TESEV

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2006
    Location:
    New Orleans, LA
    #13
    I'm not too terribly optimistic about them coming out with a version for the new MBP. The iMac has been out for a long time now and they still don't have a version for it yet.

    The thought of it tho has my hopes up. I really want the new MBP but the glossy **** is the dealbreaker.
     
  14. bkeezy
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    #14
    It is so tempting to look past it but I can't. I think I'll go to the apple store with some steel wool tomorrow and try a little "matte-ing" experiment...
     
  15. lucasgladding
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2007
    Location:
    Waterloo, Ontario
    #15
    I suspect Apple is counting on third-party anti-glare solutions. Personally, I would look to older hanging CRT filters before anything else.

    I'm very interested to know how much the glass helps the rigidity of the system. The extra protection for the screen is a definite plus IMHO.

    There are plenty of creative professionals who do not need the matte screen. For anyone deploying to a device with a glossy screen, the new MBP should offer more accurate representation of colors than matte if calibrated correctly. I'll looking forward to replacing my current system with one of the MBPs for my web work. For anything print-related, a secondary monitor that is matte is always an option.
     
  16. magallanes
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2008
    Location:
    South of Jurassic Park
    #16
    i am bit curious :does anyone love glossy? Or its only Jobs.
     
  17. JRTeK
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2008
  18. costabunny
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68020

    costabunny

    Joined:
    May 15, 2008
    Location:
    Weymouth, UK
    #18
    ME - I Like it :)

    (Oh damn you said other than Steve... dangit)
     
  19. Timur
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Timur

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    #19
    Can anyone explain this please. If it reduces the ultraviolet radiation emitted from the monitor to "reduce the burden on your eyes" how can it be "blocking out ultraviolet light" from the liquid crystals?

    The first part of that nonsense suggests that UV comes from inside the liquid crystals, so they are obviously less in danger of outsight UV than of inside UV anyway. The second part suggest that external UV light is blocked away from the crystals which effectively means it is reflected back to your "burndened" eyes unless there is some special filter that turns UV light into smaller frequencies (resulting in a color teinted image).

    Some marketing people really lost it. :cool:
     
  20. toke lahti
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2007
    Location:
    Helsinki, Finland
    #20
    In quality logic matte would be the choise.
    But Apple makes bigger profit with glossy, so they advertise it better, so people buy it and in the end Apple has nice excuse to drop matte away.

    "Pro choise is no choise!"
     
  21. Koodauw
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68040

    Koodauw

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Location:
    Madison
    #21
    The fact really is that it is a personal preference, and some of us prefer a matte screen. Back on topic, has anyone tried any sort of antiglare film perhaps for a MB or something similar. If so I am sure there are lots of us who love to see a review / pics.
     
  22. magallanes
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2008
    Location:
    South of Jurassic Park
    #22
    Amen brother, i wish i can see a photo showing a matte vs glossy from latest mbp and in different places.
     
  23. polar-blair
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2008
    #23
    I do :D
     
  24. rdowns
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #24
    And most everyone I know with a laptop has a glossy one. So what does this prove? Not a damn thing.




    Apparently, Apple's customers do as they are selling laptops like hot cakes. Did you see the numbers Tim Cook presented at the announcement?



    Any proof that Apple makes more money on glossy screens?
     
  25. thespyglass
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    thespyglass

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2008
    Location:
    Liverpool UK
    #25
    I'd love some opinions on this as well.
     

Share This Page