...does somebody want to help patent a MBA case/sleeve that looks like a manilla office envelope?
LOL! I was thinking they should pack it with one! (felt inside too)
...does somebody want to help patent a MBA case/sleeve that looks like a manilla office envelope?
Quote:
Originally Posted by averyash
Rather big in comparison to what? An iPod? A magazine? Seriously.
Footprint. You guys are coming up with all sorts of uses where an UMPC or ultraportable (with a small screen) would be perfect. In comparison to that, a footprint the size of a MacBook isn't what I would call "tiny". In fact, it's almost as big as my MBP15" because of that bezel. That, to me, is "rather big".
This is in fact the thinnest laptop out thereReally? A fact? Did you check? Are you certain that there is no other computer out there (with a keyboard) thinner than 19mm?
Sigh... perhaps you are missing the point. Have you seen the coverage of this computer? Yes, you and I, and many more on this site, with understand that the MBA is .06 inches thicker than Intel's metro. Thanks to savy touting and useful press coverage, when the average consumer thinks about buying a laptop, their first thought will be to Apple's MacBook Air, that cool and very thin new computer that Jobs, and subsequently the New York Times and the Journal, have labeled the "thinnest computer."
Quote:
I'm going to assume that Tosser is refering to the "footprint" of the MBA and how there's not that much difference between the MacBook and this.
Yup.
Maybe you didn't neet to respond with your first comment.
Quote:
This has been getting lots of attention here on MR, but from the perspective of many potential buyers, this is plus, not a drawback. Full-size keyboard, reasonable screen size
Really? That bezel and the area around the keyboard is a plus? How is that benificial to anything?
Let's wait until we get a look under the hood of the MBA... I would be surprised if there is wasted space. Sure, it would be nice to see the bezel gone, but not at the expense of thickness. Before you comment with "thickness doesn't matter, it's footprint that counts, etc." please read my intial post. This issue is covered.
Quote:
Let's think about where people put their laptop when traveling primarlily a backpack or briefcase. With either of these choices, thin is what matters.
You're kidding right? So when I travel with my laptop, I only care about "thin"?
Nice of you to tell me. If you have said weight, I might have agreed quite a bit.
Weight is important as well, but no, I'm not telling you what you care about. I think it's clear that you care much more about footprints than thickness. What I AM telling you is that when many people travel with their laptop, especially if they're on business, they care more about how thin their laptop is than how. When a computer's footprint gets smaller, it's screen gets smaller. When a computer gets thinner, this is not the case. Many people are not looking for something that feels small, they're looking for a computer that feels like a computer but that is lighter and leaves more room in a bag.
What apple has done is quite brilliant. They have created a computer that is smaller and lighter when closed, but still feels like a full-sized laptop when being used.
Quote:
As someone who traveled with a 12" PowerBook G4 for nearly three years, what you might not know is that the 12" PowerBook (1.18") was actually THICKER than either the 15" or 17" PowerBooks (1.1"). When you're putting your computer vertically in a backpack or briefcase, finding a laptop that is thin is much more desirable than one with a small footprint.
Okay, so by your logic, it would be better to travel with a 15" og 17" MBP than a 12" PB all else being equal.
No. But I would say that I could fit marginally more in a backpack moving from a 15" to a 12," because of the lack of a drop in thickness. A stack of paper gets thicker when you swap a 15" PB for a 12".
Quote:
I would be very interested to hear why all of the proponents of a reduced footprint for their laptop are privileging footprint over thinness.
To me it's several things, but in essense: You can have the same screen, have a slimmer bezel, less useless space, the screen (assuming it would be a little smaller) would be less prone to be twisted or pressed in the bag (because a taller box will inherently be stronger than a thinner one, I could get my firewire, which I need to make a living. Well there are others, more specific ones, like placing the computer in a smaller pocket, somewhere else in the bag and so on, plus a few other.
Interesting. The MBA is not for you.
Sorry, my bad.You need to do your research before making statements like that. The battery is not non-changeable, it's just not user-changeable. Apple will replace the battery for you for only the cost of the battery (US$129) - no install fee.
I can't believe how much whining everyone did about the lack of a portable macbook pro.
So, steve read, and he's got right on it and brought out a machine that business users are going to be able to take with them to get their work done - and a fast one.
And now everyone is whining.
Go figure.
Depends how you define lifetime. Battery will loose half of its capacity after 500 charges.Battery replacement is $129, same as on a macbook. Sure, you have to turn it over to Apple for replacement, but this happens, what, once in a computer's lifetime?
Everyone seems to have glossed over the fact that the major engineering feat of this computer is the smaller processor and mainboard yet providing the same computing power. ....look for it it in all future iterations of macbooks ....Intel certainly didn't spend all that time squishing down the processor just for the MBA.
I agree completley with the originator of this post. One point I think everyone is missing here is that there is a reason why Apple dubbed this machine Mac Book Air not Mac Book Utra Thin or whatever.
Consider this, Apple introduced Back To My Mac with it's latest OS along with the ability to sychronize both your desktop and notebook with the help of .Mac. Now Time Capsule has been released which is a combination of wireless ("Air") as well as 500 GB or 1 TB of storage space. And if you recall, you can "share" the drive of your desktop or other mac machine with the MBA as well.
By now you should see the point I'm trying to make. Apple has put all the wheels in motion for you to make the MOST use out of the MBA without all the bells and whistles people are complaining about.
Apple foresees a future when everything is done seamlessly through the use of wireless technology. Everyone should open their eyes! This is just the beginning, I can't just imagine what the future holds.
Depends how you define lifetime. Battery will loose half of its capacity after 500 charges.
Maybe there will be some external batteries connected to magsafe for people who would like to carry 2 batteries or whose internal battery is getting weak...
As a shareholder, I wanted to see Apple release something that sells in large volumes.
As a shareholder, I wanted to see Apple release something that sells in large volumes.
If Apple could see to it to add one more usb slot - I think I might finally get something to replace my ageing powerbook.
Of course I'd get one from reburb store as it's just a bit too pricey imo.
How many of you guys here have a main PC and then a laptop? Those are the people that the MacBook Air targets.
People are defining subcompact by dimensions. Apple is defining it by weight. I suspect that the segment the Air is aimed to will also define it by weight.
blah blah blah I think Apple should conform to my needs and nobody else's
As a road warrior the MBA would be nice if only it had an Ethernet connection. Many hotels have only Cable available in their rooms. Wireless is usually available in the lobby but I don't sleep in the lobby.![]()
This is potentially a new class that perhaps should be defined as ultralight - a full size laptop that weighs as much as a cramped ultra portable.
I don't disagree with you about MBP's being the machine of choice for the majority of users, but why does the introduction of a MBA imply that the MBP's will not be updated?But for 'The Rest of Us" i.e. those who have to earn their money by using notebooks, MBA is only a good choice, if it fits a lot better in a bag than MB or MBP (which I doubt, as the footprint of MBA is not really smaller). OK there is the better design, but for the rest MB and MBP, also quite thin, are by far the better deal.