apparently, i mean who cares if i think the pros of the iphone outweigh the cons and decided to get one....
but to argue that the iphone shouldnt have common features because apple didnt have to let the iphone exist is quite amusing to say the least
Pshh. I'm certainly not saying it
shouldn't have what everyone wants. Heck, I want half of what people complain about, as well.
I just don't like how people get into the mindset that Apple "owes them" these features, because Apple doesn't "owe them" anything.
I normally hold everything else to Apple's standard, stating: Because it
can be done (speaking in terms of a feature of hardware, software, or (inter)operability), there is no excuse as to why it
shouldn't be done. A good example of which is the worthless modem provided by my ISP. I have to restart it quite often. As I do not have to restart any of my Apple hardware because of faults, I am upset that the time and effort was not expended to make sure that the modem would function on its own for extended periods.
But in the case of the iPhone, for some things, at least,
the opposite is very true. My piece-of-flip Verizon phone has voice dialing. The iPhone doesn't. This annoys me. This worthless piece of plastic also has MMS, which I don't use. The iPhone doesn't. This annoys me on behalf of everyone who uses MMS.
See where I'm coming from now? Sorry for the ambiguity.