Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow even a good review from Engadget:

This isn't just an Apple tablet made to a budget. This isn't just a shrunken-down iPad. This is, in many ways, Apple's best tablet yet, an incredibly thin, remarkably light, obviously well-constructed device that offers phenomenal battery life. No, the performance doesn't match Apple's latest and yes, that display is a little lacking in resolution, but nothing else here will leave you wanting. At $329, this has a lot to offer over even Apple's more expensive tablets.

Those comparing this to the Kindle Fire HD will have a hard time, as that's a tablet manufactured to a fixed cost and designed to sell you content. This is very much more. Similarly, the hardware here is much nicer than the Nexus 7 and it offers access to the comprehensively more tablet-friendly App Store, but whether that's worth the extra cost depends entirely on the size of your budget -- and your proclivity toward Android.

Regardless, the iPad mini is well worth considering for anybody currently in the market for a tablet. Its cost is compelling, its design superb and it of course gives access to the best selection of tablet-optimized apps on the market. To consider it just a cheap, tiny iPad is a disservice. This is, simply, a great tablet.
 
Seems like everyone loves it... Except the people out here who've been claiming "The iPad would never work right if it was smaller". I wish those people would chime in and tell us what crow tastes like.
 
Seems like everyone loves it... Except the people out here who've been claiming "The iPad would never work right if it was smaller". I wish those people would chime in and tell us what crow tastes like.

You know.. I always thought the iPad was the perfect size. I figured those smaller tablet's sold poorly because of the form factor. Then one day I was in Best Buy and happened to play with one of them. It wasn't a very popular tablet, but it was 7" (don't remember the model) and I thought after about 1 minute of using it... this would be really awesome. Soon after, the Nexus 7 came out.. I thought it was great. Only thing I didn't like was the aspect ratio, I much prefer'd the iPad's aspect ratio. So I'm glad they kept that with the Mini.

EDIT: To clarify, I thought those Android tablets were made small basically to cut cost, to hit a certain price point.
 
Can anyone tell me the name of the 2D side-scrolling action game that was being played on the Verge video review?

The game looked like awesome fun! I want to download it, but I have no idea what it is. Help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Can anyone tell me the name of the 2D side-scrolling action game that was being played on the Verge video review?

The game looked like awesome fun! I want to download it, but I have no idea what it is. Help would be greatly appreciated!

It's called punch quest, and it's one of the best games for iOS, I love it!

Best of all, it's FREE

----------

Now, can anyone direct me to the background that the verge's iPad mini had?
 
I think the iPad mini form factor is going to be just perfect. Thin, light. The display is going to be a little disappointing--I really don't like seeing the pixels while reading any more--and the RAM/Processor are a letdown, but for now the iPad mini will do, and the next one will be awesome.
 
wait till you hear review from the actual users....
You mean "actual users" like the ones out here who claim that their eyes bleed every time they see a non-retina screen and now justify that the iPad Mini doesnt need retina? Or the people out here who slammed anyone complaining of iPad3 sluggishness and now defend an early update because "this will help with the iPad 3 sluggishness"? Or the ones that say the quality of the maps app is more important than the maps data? Or the ones with such abnormally small thumbs that they couldnt possibly use a 4" screen (until Apple made one and now its the new perfect size)

I love reading the forums but (other than a few genuine users out here) I would trust The Verge a million times more than I'd trust any of the people who constantly scream at anyone who gives a negative opinion.
 
You mean "actual users" like the ones out here who claim that their eyes bleed every time they see a non-retina screen and now justify that the iPad Mini doesnt need retina? Or the people out here who slammed anyone complaining of iPad3 sluggishness and now defend an early update because "this will help with the iPad 3 sluggishness"? Or the ones that say the quality of the maps app is more important than the maps data? Or the ones with such abnormally small thumbs that they couldnt possibly use a 4" screen (until Apple made one and now its the new perfect size)

I love reading the forums but (other than a few genuine users out here) I would trust The Verge a million times more than I'd trust any of the people who constantly scream at anyone who gives a negative opinion.

Exactly. Another laughable thing I use to see right after the Galaxy S3 was released.
>That screen is way too saturated, the iPhone 4S is way better!
>iPhone 5 keynote: iPhone now has 44% more saturation.
>iPhone 5 screen is soo beautiful and colorful!
 
Exactly. Another laughable thing I use to see right after the Galaxy S3 was released.
>That screen is way too saturated, the iPhone 4S is way better!
>iPhone 5 keynote: iPhone now has 44% more saturation.
>iPhone 5 screen is soo beautiful and colorful!

Actually SIII's screen is way too saturated, not in a good way. The color is not accurate, way too much saturation for certain colors typical of an AMOLED screen.
 
iPad_screen_compare.jpg
 
Exactly. Another laughable thing I use to see right after the Galaxy S3 was released.
>That screen is way too saturated, the iPhone 4S is way better!
>iPhone 5 keynote: iPhone now has 44% more saturation.
>iPhone 5 screen is soo beautiful and colorful!

Or the flipflopping thats just around the corner, "Scott Forstall's decisions to keep iOS looking similar each generation is essential to iOS development" becoming "Putting Jony Ive in charge of human interface is going to finally help update iOS's look and feel".

Anyway, speaking of color, is anyone concerned about how the "Slate" back of the iPad Mini gives a bluish tint? They mentioned it in the Verge review so hopefully it doesnt look that bad in real life.
 

Attachments

  • ipadrearname.jpeg
    ipadrearname.jpeg
    42.3 KB · Views: 162
Anyway, speaking of color, is anyone concerned about how the "Slate" back of the iPad Mini gives a bluish tint? They mentioned it in the Verge review so hopefully it doesnt look that bad in real life.

Im sure it'll be fine. Anything is better than the silver that im tired of seeing on all my ipads.
 
Or the flipflopping thats just around the corner, "Scott Forstall's decisions to keep iOS looking similar each generation is essential to iOS development" becoming "Putting Jony Ive in charge of human interface is going to finally help update iOS's look and feel".

Anyway, speaking of color, is anyone concerned about how the "Slate" back of the iPad Mini gives a bluish tint? They mentioned it in the Verge review so hopefully it doesnt look that bad in real life.

It could have been a reflection from ambient light or a wall or something. Colors always take on aspects of their environment.
 
It could have been a reflection from ambient light or a wall or something. Colors always take on aspects of their environment.

It's the same as the slate iPhone 5. It looks bluish depending on what light you look at it in. It's not because there is blue nearby its more the way the light reflects off the surface give a blue/black tone.
 
It's the same as the slate iPhone 5. It looks bluish depending on what light you look at it in. It's not because there is blue nearby its more the way the light reflects off the surface give a blue/black tone.

okay

they should call it "cool black" instead of "warm black"
 
The end verdict read up was very well put..

The iPad mini is an excellent tablet — but it's not a very cheap one. Whether that's by design, or due to market forces beyond Apple's control, I can't say for sure. I can't think of another company that cares as much about how its products are designed and built — or one that knows how to maximize a supply chain as skillfully — so something tells me it's no accident that this tablet isn't selling for $200. It doesn't feel like Apple is racing to some lowest-price bottom — rather it seems to be trying to raise the floor.

And it does raise the floor here. There's no tablet in this size range that's as beautifully constructed, works as flawlessly, or has such an incredible software selection. Would I prefer a higher-res display? Certainly. Would I trade it for the app selection or hardware design? For the consistency and smoothness of its software, or reliability of its battery? Absolutely not. And as someone who's been living with (and loving) Google's Nexus 7 tablet for a few months, I don't say that lightly.

The iPad mini hasn't wrapped up the "cheapest tablet" market by any stretch of the imagination. But the "best small tablet" market? Consider it captured.


You should also check out

http://daringfireball.net/2012/10/ipad_mini

If the Mini had a retina display, I’d switch from the iPad 3 in a heartbeat. As it stands, I’m going to switch anyway. Going non-retina is a particularly bitter pill for me, but I like the iPad Mini’s size and weight so much that I’m going to swallow it.

My guess is that this is going to play out much like the iPod and iPod Mini back in 2004: the full-size model will continue to sell strongly, but the Mini is going to become the bestselling model.




The Telegraph

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/apple/9644594/Apple-iPad-mini-review.html

Apple could probably have matched the pixel density of the 7-inch tablets if it had wished to but that would have changed the screen resolution, meaning that existing iPad apps would have run with black bands of unused pixels alongside them. As it is, the 1024x768 display means the existing library of 275,000 tablet specific apps are all available.

I tested a few more recent - and demanding - apps to see how the iPad mini coped and found no problems at all. The mini is powered by the same Apple A5 chip found inside the iPad 2 and apps didn't seem to run slowly, nor did the device get particularly warm.

When it comes to tablet-specific apps, the iPad is still some way ahead. You won't find the amazing Touch Press apps, such as Shakespeare's Sonnets or The Waste Land, on anything other than an iPad, for example. Android will catch up, just as it has with smartphone apps, but for now the gap is significant enough that it should make you think twice about buying a rival.

On the other hand, what will make some think twice about buying an iPad mini is the price. Starting at £269 for a WiFi only model, this is £100 dearer than the Kindle Fire HD or the Nexus 7, which is now available in a 16GB version for £159.

Whether it's worth it depends on how much of a premium you put on great design and a vast ecosystem of apps. Apple will sell a lot of these little beauties, that's for sure.


and The Guardian

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/oct/31/ipad-mini-review?newsfeed=true

Conclusion

Those in favour: excellent build quality; very light, comparatively large screen, not significantly wider than competition (for putting in coat pockets), excellent text rendering, huge selection of apps, music, books and films, pain-free setup from iCloud backups for existing accounts; 3G/4G LTE option; fast-growing range of accessories.

Those against: price is higher than rivals – at £239 £269, it's £40 £70 more than the 16GB Nexus 7; no expandable storage; letterboxing of films; no HDMI out (though AirPlay is a wireless equivalent).

Lining those pluses and minuses up against those for the Nexus 7 – which garnered four stars – there's no doubt that this is indeed a five-star device. The 20% 35% difference in comparative price is more than made up by the difference in build quality and software selection.

Apple is going to sell a lot of these – quite possibly more than the "large" iPad – in this quarter. The only way Apple could improve on this product would be (as some people are already agitating) to give it a retina screen and somehow make it lighter. That might happen at some point. You can wait if you like; other people, in the meantime, will be buying this one.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.