Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

tubeexperience

macrumors 68040
Original poster
Feb 17, 2016
3,192
3,897
Many of us have been talking our way around this issue for the past week without directly confronting it, so I feel like now’s as good a time to address it as any: Apple’s new MacBook Pro laptops are not designed for professional use.

[...]

But the change with Apple’s 2016 generation of MacBook Pros is that those downsides have been amped up — more expensive and less compatible than ever before — to an extreme that exposes the fallacy of the continued use of the Pro moniker. These are Apple’s premiumlaptops, its deluxe devices, but not in any meaningful way computers tailored for the pros. A MacBook Pro is now simply what you buy if you’re in the Apple ecosystem and have a higher budget and expectations than the MacBook can fulfill.

[...]

MacBook Pros were once professional computers that could also appeal to an aspiring consumer audience. They were pricey for a general-purpose laptop, but justifiable as a luxury purchase or as a device that pays for itself by making its user more efficient and productive. But today MacBook Pros are very definitely consumer devices that only gesture toward a professional audience without truly endeavoring to appease it.

[...]

Apple’s 2016 MacBook Pros carry on the Pro moniker dishonestly. At least we should all hope that's the case — because if Apple actually believes that these new laptops are suitable and sufficient for intensive professional needs, then the company's long and happy relationship with creatives may be heading toward a calamitous breakup.

Source: http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/7/13548052/the-macbook-pro-lie
 
Yawn.

They are designed for professional use but at the same time they're designed with an eye towards the future which is USB-C and not USB-A, VGA, DVI or whatever. Yes it's a tough Transition but it'll pay off.

I earn my Money using a MBP 2013 and I use two Dongles every day at the customer site and I'll be using two Dongles with my new MBP 2016 when I'm at the Office.

Of Course I love working without Dongles when I'm at home where everything is already wireless but it's a tradeoff I'm willing to make.

Every morning when I turn on my MBP i smile because it's so lovely to work with. Yes I liked my Thinkpads but I didn't love them as much as my MBP.

And as for the Performance: we'll get the fastest CPUs Intel is offering right now, we'll get the fastest SSD available in any Laptop. So please...
 
Its a shame that The Verge publishes articles by obviously incompetent writers. Already the fact that he complains about Apple not using (the slower) Kaby Lake chips discredits his entire argumentative enterprise. And what worth are the complains that there are barely any performance increases. Or complains about 'power sipping AMD graphics' before we even had an chance to compare Pascal to Polaris at low TDPs.
 
Yawn.

They are designed for professional use but at the same time they're designed with an eye towards the future which is USB-C and not USB-A, VGA, DVI or whatever. Yes it's a tough Transition but it'll pay off.

I earn my Money using a MBP 2013 and I use two Dongles every day at the customer site and I'll be using two Dongles with my new MBP 2016 when I'm at the Office.

Of Course I love working without Dongles when I'm at home where everything is already wireless but it's a tradeoff I'm willing to make.

Every morning when I turn on my MBP i smile because it's so lovely to work with. Yes I liked my Thinkpads but I didn't love them as much as my MBP.

And as for the Performance: we'll get the fastest CPUs Intel is offering right now, we'll get the fastest SSD available in any Laptop. So please...

Yeah so anyone with any sense would stick to the 2015 models which were excellent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bruinsrme
When even The Verge is risking its freebies... you know something is rotten in Denmark.

I'm betting Death by Dongle as the Newsweek cover for the 2018 Apple bubble crash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: raqball and kazmac
They haven't even reviewed the Touch Bar models and they come out with this joke of an article? Ok.

I think Apple made a mistake naming the non-Touch Bar model a Pro, but the idea that these new MBPs are somehow not designed in the spirit of past MBPs is crazy. They're a clear evolution of where Apple was already going.
 
  • Like
Reactions: myscrnnm
They haven't even reviewed the Touch Bar models and they come out with this joke of an article? Ok.

I think Apple made a mistake naming the non-Touch Bar model a Pro, but to claim that these new MBPs are somehow a compromised product from the MBPs of the past is crazy.

though they shouldn't rush to conclusions until they've played with them all, touchbar won't do anything to lessen the blow of having only one port type,

whether its 2 or 4
 
I make money with my MBP. I do quite a bit of work on it. A slow MBP can cause problems for the many lectures I give with animations and video - many of which are created on the MBP itself, though I also have a 32GB 3.5GHz i7 quad core iMac at home and a $16,000 32GB xeon HP workstation + FDA-certified DICOM diagnostic 7 megapixel monitor at work for the heavy lifting. I would most certainly consider myself a professional. And I'm very much looking forward to my new MBP.

Exactly what do you mean by professional?

Sure, a few dongles might be a bit of a hassle if you prefer not to carry any little cable bits with you. But since most "professionals" need to be prepared for anything, a couple ounces of adapters isn't going to break anyone's back. I always had to carry HDMI, VGA and DVI adapters with me when I used a MacBook Air in case I got someplace to give a lecture and they have a different projection system than I expected. My current 13" MBP has an HDMI port, so that saves me one adapter, but that's hardly a major savings.

Should the MBP have had an SD card slot? Maybe. But I'd hardly say it's not a professional machine without it. My $16K HP workstation doesn't have one, either.

A MacBook Pro is now simply what you buy if you’re in the Apple ecosystem and have a higher budget and expectations than the MacBook can fulfill.
This has always been a true statement. Not seeing how that's a negative.
 
though they shouldn't rush to conclusions until they've played with them all, touchbar won't do anything to lessen the blow of having only one port type,

whether its 2 or 4
Did you read it? It's a lot of bitching about the specs not being "Pro", there's barely anything on the ports.

Not using Pascal chips? Get real. Apple has never used super-high TDP parts for the dGPU in the MBPs. Complaining about no Kaby Lake? I guess they left out the part that there's literally no Kaby Lake suitable out right now squarely due to Intel dragging their feet. The keyboard isn't "pro" merely on the basis of it having low travel? Ya ok.

Maybe they can wait until they publish some benchmarks and compare them with other laptops in the class before ranting to their readers about specs.
 
Last edited:
Apple has already released the specs of the 2016 MBPs; advent of the actual hardware later will make no difference.

They are clearly by no definition 'professional,' even if meeting some less than demanding tasks. Those preferring to use OSX, and requiring truly capable laptops, have every reason to be upset. This is no accident and Apple has clearly forsaken them.

One could hope that Apple will soon realize the error of its ways.
 
Apple has already released the specs of the 2016 MBPs; advent of the actual hardware later will make no difference.

They are clearly by no definition 'professional,' even if meeting some less than demanding tasks. Those preferring to use OSX, and requiring truly capable laptops, have every reason to be upset. This is no accident and Apple has clearly forsaken them.

One could hope that Apple will soon realize the error of its ways.

Lol. Although I completely disagree... Thanks for the laugh.
 
Tech review sites probably already have them for reviews, but are still under NDA.
1. Not very good to assume this as you don't know and 2. It doesn't change the fact that as their reader I can't evaluate the device on my own merits with their review available. Instead they're making the conclusion before giving their readers a fair review. It's a disservice, but I guess I shouldn't expect much from the Verge anymore.
 
1. Not very good to assume this as you don't know and 2. It doesn't change the fact that as their reader I can't evaluate the device on my own merits with their review available. Instead they're making the conclusion before giving their readers a fair review. It's a disservice, but I guess I shouldn't expect much from the Verge anymore.

lol. The Verge is one of the biggest cheerleaders for Apple.
 
a8b4df631e9d7067e986f962c29fe9a3.jpg


just saying...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.