Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
mgargan1 said:
the problem i think is that beauty is not objective. You can not measure beauty.
So, while I think these people are extremely superficial, you have to admit, you'd like to wonder what it's like to get beer goggles at this party is going to be like ;)

Ironically,

http://channels.netscape.com/men/package.jsp?name=fte/prettyfaces/prettyfaces&floc=class-ewp-lk4-fte

Why Men Prefer Pretty Faces

So you think beauty is in the eye of the beholder? Think again. According to new research from the University of Exeter in Great Britain, the preference for pretty faces over ugly ones is embedded in our brains from the moment of birth and possibly prior to birth.

Newborn babies come fully equipped with built-in preferences, including a preference for an attractive face, that help them make sense of their new environment, report the BBC News Online and Newsweek magazine. The Exeter researchers showed more than 100 infants two images that were placed side by side. One was of an attractive face, while the other was a less attractive face. The babies, ranging in age from five hours old to two days old, spent about 80 percent of the time looking at the attractive face, while barely glancing at the unattractive face.

"You can show them pair after pair of faces that are matched for everything other than attractiveness. This leads to the conclusion that babies are born with a very detailed representation of the human face," Dr. Alan Slater, a psychologist at Exeter, explained to the BBC News. Why would infants have this capability? "It helps them to recognize familiar faces--particularly that of the mother--and it helps them in learning about the social world. Attractiveness is not simply in the eye of the beholder, it is in the brain of the newborn infant right from the moment of birth and possibly prior to birth," he added.

When those babies grow up, the preference for pretty faces doesn't change. And it crosses all cultures and geography as well. When an insular European is shown the faces of two Africans, the one he chooses as most attractive is also the same one an African chooses. And it works the other way around when an African is shown the faces of two Europeans.

"Although we think that standards of facial beauty vary over time and culture, they don't actually change that much," Slater explained to Newsweek. The evidence indicates that there is a biological and universal standard."

So don't blame a man when he can't help but look at a pretty face! He's biologically programmed that way.
 
I'm not denying the fact that I can tell the difference between an attractive person and a person who is less attractive. (actually they've determinded that a person who is more attractive has a more symmetrical face)

All I'm saying is that you can not quantify beauty like you can quantify intelligence per-say, by a GPA, IQ, or SAT score. I know that those two numbers don't truly indicate true intelligence, but it's less subjective than saying "man, she's hot". If you were a university, and you had to choose an applicant who was exactly the same in every way except one individual scored 300 points on the SAT, which applicant would you be more inclined to take?

That's all I'm getting at...
 
watch this all be the work of a serial killer, anyone remember the movie Seven?

Yea, it's late, and I haven't been sleeping well lately... I wonder why?
 
mgargan1 said:
I'm not denying the fact that I can tell the difference between an attractive person and a person who is less attractive. (actually they've determinded that a person who is more attractive has a more symmetrical face)

All I'm saying is that you can not quantify beauty like you can quantify intelligence per-say, by a GPA, IQ, or SAT score. I know that those two numbers don't truly indicate true intelligence, but it's less subjective than saying "man, she's hot". If you were a university, and you had to choose an applicant who were exactly the same in every way except one individual scored 300 points on the SAT, which applicant would you be more inclined to take?

That's all I'm getting at...

ahh gotcha ;)
 
OutThere said:
Funny thing...I don't find any of the women on the intro particularly attractive :confused: Maybe I should register under an alias to see if this is really legit. :p If it's legit it's probably full of "normal" looking people who have 0 self confidence.

Beautiful...I think not. Strange looking more likely:

I think 'she' was once a 'he'
 
mgargan1 said:
I mean, we have a mac forum because we believe macs are just neat. While we wont turn away Windows or Linux users, we have some similarites in that we do discriminate at least a little bit against non-mac users.

Exactly. We do discriminate a bit against non-Mac, Windows users, particularly ones who use Windows ME and are still ok with that, but liking someone because of any reason other than personality is shallow anyway, and I'm sure all of us have wanted to talk to a member of the opposite sex because she/he is h0t!!
 
This is funny. We were making fun of this site on a Dallas urban development forum. Unfortunately these types are pretty typical of Uptown Dallasites.
 
I see that the beautiful people don't use beautiful grammar. They say "this site is comprised of..." instead of the more grammatically correct "this site is composed of..."

Many comprise a one. One is composed of many. One is never comprised of many.
 
Sad sad.

I hopped on that site real quick, and the pictures of the "beautiful people" I did not find beautiful at all.

More like unsettlling.

Like these people were manufactured...or something.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.