Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

AdiPlayZ

macrumors member
Original poster
Nov 10, 2019
39
8
Hello, so I thought my G5 quad leaked but after removing the LCS with a folding torx key set. I checked it hasn't leaked yet, it just need a new thermal paste. I don't have thermal paste in my house but I was thinking of getting Arctic Silver 5 or Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut (Not liquid metal). What the best thermal paste here?
 
I think any of those would be more then enough for your g5
 
My personal preference is Arctic MX-4, as it is not electrically conductive and will not ruin anything if it spills onto any circuitry. It also does not need any "curing time" like Arctic Silver 5. Not only that, it ships in a much larger syringe than Arctic Silver 5, decreasing the amount of times you need to restock when constantly making new applications of paste.

I also feel like I've collectively gotten lower temperatures from use cases with it as opposed to when I used Arctic Silver 5.
 
My personal preference is Arctic MX-4, as it is not electrically conductive and will not ruin anything if it spills onto any circuitry. It also does not need any "curing time" like Arctic Silver 5.
What about Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AphoticD
Upon further research into Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut, it seems than any difference between the two appears to be within the margin of error.

Given Arctic MX-4's comparatively lower prices, I would suggest that instead.
 
Agree with MX-4. That is the go-to thermal paste these days. Grizzly is really only for overclockers and those who need to extract the absolute maximum cooling from their equipment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1 and z970
Grizzly Kryonaut made a big difference to my DC and Quad G5s. I didn't regret spending an extra $10 or so to provide them with the best cooling. My air-cooled DP models (2.0GHz and 1.8GHz) were fine with MX4.
 
Grizzly Kryonaut made a big difference to my DC and Quad G5s. I didn't regret spending an extra $10 or so to provide them with the best cooling. My air-cooled DP models (2.0GHz and 1.8GHz) were fine with MX4.

How much difference? 80C to 50C in load?
 
I use AS5 because it's inexpensive and available.

In reality, I've used most of the main-line thermal pastes on the market and found that for normal applications none of them make a difference in operating temperatures beyond a a couple of degrees either way. That kind of difference could easily be put down to difference in application.

Remember that the best cooling comes from direct contact between the CPU die/IHS and heatsink. Thermal paste is there to fill irregularities and is necessary, but in most cases "less is more." Use any good quality paste on the market, apply it properly and sparingly(most don't give instructions for bare dies-I like doing card spreads on them) and you'll be fine.

Aside from that, any of these pastes under discussion are going to be better than what Apple used originally, and are going to be better than even a great quality paste that's now ~15 years old.
 
How much difference? 80C to 50C in load?

Something like that. Here are my DC 2.3GHz G5 results from 2018;
 
An important thermal paste spec to look at is the longevity it has, and many don't even list that. Longevity really speaks to the overall quality of the paste. That's why I always use MX4. It's rated for 8 years, but will easily do 10.
arct0002_1.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: z970
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.