Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
While yes, it’s interesting that this came from a cell phone and we should all be happy to have something so capable in out pocket everyday, literally any camera could do this once strapped to a star tracker. A camera from the 1800’s could do this. A camera made out of a cardboard box and duct tape could do this. I have a large format camera from 1912 that I’ve done astrophotography with. Nothing special about the sensors or other tech in the phone made this possible, a long exposure is a long exposure.

The rules of physics still apply here, it’s still a noisy high-ISO image off a small sensor. And a rather soft one at that (is there a feasible way to manually focus the iPhone lens?)

I would have used the full 48MP sensor at a lower ISO, shot proRAW and stacked multiple exposures.
 
Someone just show me a good picture of the moon, without any post processing.

Just look up, and using only the built in features, take a picture of the moon that doesn’t just look like a bright white orb with no detail.

I’ve never been able to do that with an iPhone, even after watching someone with a Galaxy S20 do it standing right next to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haruhiko
I’ve never been able to do that with an iPhone, even after watching someone with a Galaxy S20 do it standing right next to me.

That is because Samsung is creating the image with the help of "AI".
You can read all about it on da web, eg:
 
Good lord. Taking photos like these with the equipment the photographer used is possible with any decent DSLR and a lease with the proper F-Stop. You actually want higher f-stop as that will ensure more light gets to the censor / film.

Why the iPhone is being touted as being in any way spectacular here is just pandering to the hopeful.

PS: google has had this in their pixel cameras for YEARS now. NO special equipment necessary.
Well the point is clearly lost on you sir…
 
The Night Mode for night sky photography is amazing, especially its ability to stack short exposures!

However, keep several caveats in mind.

1. Such photos are taken under very dark skies. You're not going to manage anything like this from where most people live.

2. They are taken using a tripod.

3. Even basic digital cameras from circa 2007-2010 with shutter (15 sec.) and ISO controls (400-800) can take similar photos.

4. Many such photographs are overexposed, with lots of noise in them. That produces much of the speckling you see. What looks like “billions and billions” of stars — or a glorious starry, starry night — is an illusion; many or most of the “stars” are artificial. Their uniform brightness and density is a give-away.

The advantages the digital cameras have include much larger sensors, longer exposure times, and the taking of a comparably long dark frame to subtract out the sensor's noise and hot pixels.

5. Even iPhones without Night Mode can achieve comparable quality photographs using 3rd party apps such as Neural Cam and Night Cap. Night Cap even has special modes for capturing star trails, the ISS, meteors, etc. See the gallery at http://www.nightcapcamera.com/gallery/ These apps work, even from semi-light polluted suburban skies, and even with now dated, lower-end iPhones such as the 1st generation SE from 2016.

6. It is, alas, true that several Android phones have had such night sky capabilities for several years and produce comparable or better photos.

7. As to the recent comment about the Moon… those same low-end, decade+ old digital cameras that have both greater zoom than the iPhones and direct control over shutter speed (shorter the better) and white balance setting (daytime best) — and can render the Moon with craters, rays, etc., handheld, quite readily. But the best iPhone photographs of the Moon will be snapshots, even handheld, no Night Mode needed, through a telescope's eyepiece.

Bottom line: Night Mode can produce fantastic photographs, but realistic expectations are needed. You can achieve equally high quality results much less expensively by getting a used, decades-old digital camera instead of a high-end iPhone. You'd also have no concerns if you dropped it or tripped over the tripod in the dark and broke it!
 
Good lord. Taking photos like these with the equipment the photographer used is possible with any decent DSLR and a lease with the proper F-Stop. You actually want higher f-stop as that will ensure more light gets to the censor / film.

Why the iPhone is being touted as being in any way spectacular here is just pandering to the hopeful.

PS: google has had this in their pixel cameras for YEARS now. NO special equipment necessary.
mostly correct - apart from the fact that a higher f-stop means a smaller aperture and thus less light.
 
Good lord. Taking photos like these with the equipment the photographer used is possible with any decent DSLR and a lease with the proper F-Stop. You actually want higher f-stop as that will ensure more light gets to the censor / film.

Why the iPhone is being touted as being in any way spectacular here is just pandering to the hopeful.

PS: google has had this in their pixel cameras for YEARS now. NO special equipment necessary.
It is not as good as a full frame with a good fast prime. But damn, it kind of approaches some MFT shots or even APSC taken with less than ideal lens choices.

It comes out about as good (or bad) when taken from my old canon t2i using the kit lens for example. Obvi would come out better with a fast prime or a newer camera but stikl, at the rate apple is doing this, in another 2-4 years dslrs and iphones could be neck and neck. The only thing missing is a long telephoto and better IQ and light gathering/color sensing all around.

DSLRs are still relatively safe, but Cams like the sony rx100 or panasonic lx10 or even olympus tg6 are in danger
 
  • Like
Reactions: CabanossiHead
£350 tripod is not made for a mobile sensor. But as an exploration into the realms of possibility it's a neat test.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morgenland


One iPhone 14 rumor that never panned out was some sort of astrophotography feature, but that hasn't stopped users from showcasing just what the camera on iPhone 14 Pro models can do when pointed at the night sky.

2astrophotography-iphone-14-pro.jpeg

These fantastic shots shared by MacRumors forum member ToddH were taken using an iPhone 14 Pro Max in Night Mode with the maximum available exposure time of 30 seconds in the Camera app.

Taken at ISO 12,500 and ISO 10,000 using the 12-megapixel setting (Night Mode isn't available when the 48-megapixel setting is on), the images were shot using Apple's ProRAW format and then edited using the mobile version of Lightroom on the iPhone itself.

To get the shot, ToddH says he attached the iPhone 14 Pro Max to a tripod with a Skywatcher tracking device that moves in the opposite direction of the Earth's rotation, making the sky appear still to the camera to avoid elongation and make the stars look pinpoint.

1astrophotography-iphone-14-pro.jpeg

Like the iPhone 13 lineup last year, there was chatter prior to the announcement of the iPhone 14 series that the new devices could offer a specific astrophotography feature – speculation that was further fanned by Apple's choice of graphics to promote its "Far Out" media event. No such feature was forthcoming.

Other users have been sharing their own photos in the same discussion thread.

Article Link: These Awesome Photos of the Milky Way Were Taken on an iPhone 14 Pro
First, you have to use the tripod, to get a decent astrology photo (which really defeats the objective) Second this photo will have been taken in pro raw and then edited and Thirdly it would be twice as good on something like the Samsung Ultra (and I'm a big Apple fan) iPhone has been and is very weak in this area
 
At ISO 12,500 on a sensor that size half of what you're seeing isn't stars, it's noise!

Not necessarily. As the iphone takes multiple exposures to use in it's image-stack, noise reduction will likely be temporal. It probably won't take one single exposure like a "proper" camera, and let all noise burn in over 30 seconds but instead compare different shots and eleminate anything that's not there most of the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crowbot
I took these with my 13 Pro last year, his are amazing!
Nothing amazing about it, he used a tripod which gave him a 30 sec exposure, shot it in pro raw and then used a professional editing tool, if you did the same on your 13 plus, you would get a similar result, problem with iPhones is that you can't get a decent astro photo without going through that process, Androids unfortunately are way way ahead in astro photography. This photo is just Apple spin 😏
 
What third party apps allow long exposure times like this?

Would love to try shots like this with Halide.
You need to put your phone on a tripod to get a 30 sec exposure and take the photo in pro raw and then have a very good editing app, Apple are doing some heavy spinning in this case
 
The best thing to use for shots like this is a fully mechanical film camera. Complete control over the image, exposures as long as you want, no batteries to deplete, no sensors to overheat…
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimmyMac
The best thing to use for shots like this is a fully mechanical film camera. Complete control over the image, exposures as long as you want, no batteries to deplete, no sensors to overheat…
Is this the best possible way to take a shot like this? Of course not.

Is it awesome and amazing that a phone that goes into your pocket took a shot like this? Of course.
 
While the images are nice, this device is the true hero, and the reason why you can have a 30s exposure. With 300 times the light gathered you could reasonably capture the shot hand-held (assuming decent IBIS).
Not on an iPhone, it only gives you the 30 sec exposure when you put in on a tripod 😏 it's rubbish for astro photography and sorry but the average user does not walk around with the specialist equipment needed to get a shot like this, which would be twice as good on a Pixel or a Samsung 😏
 
Tracking device is the real hero here, not the phone. Most cheaper phones should be able to achieve similar results with the Skywatcher and some post processing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrRom92 and 4odomi
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.