They needed a media event for this?

Discussion in 'iPhone' started by Eso, Sep 9, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Eso macrumors 68000

    Eso

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2008
    #1
    Nano gets camera and the iTunes store looks different. Zzzz
     
  2. 2259 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    #3
    And 3.1 released, giving MMS to people who bought the 3GS to use MMS .... and iTunes 9.0 is released, a load of new games, new platform on the new touches.

    yer zzzz :confused::confused:
     
  3. PCboarder macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Location:
    California
    #4
    the event was not that bad...people just get there hopes up on rumors
     
  4. darngooddesign macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    #5
    Yeah, the idiots were hoping for a tablet at an iPod event.
     
  5. nfl46 macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2008
    #6
    Lol, its a IPOD event, NOT an iPhone event, etc.

    The main focus is iPOD...say it with me i-p-o-d.
     
  6. Small White Car macrumors G4

    Small White Car

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Location:
    Washington DC
    #7
    That's why they called it a MEDIA EVENT. It's not a "chatters on the internet event."

    It exists so the Washington Post can make an small article tomorrow morning at the bottom of the web site: "iPod Gains Camera"

    Then, people say "oh" and read the sports page.

    The fact that you watched live bloggers type about it in real time is your own fault.
     
  7. 2259 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    #8
    Very well put :cool:
     
  8. Small White Car macrumors G4

    Small White Car

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Location:
    Washington DC
    #9
    I mean, don't get me wrong...I read THREE live bloggers at once! I'm not critisizing anyone here for doing it!

    But I sure as heck know that it's overkill on my end...I can't blame Apple for that.
     
  9. kainjow Moderator emeritus

    kainjow

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2000
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page