Thinking about buying iMac. Do I go 20 or 24

Discussion in 'Buying Tips and Advice' started by cormeister7, Jun 16, 2009.

  1. cormeister7 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2009
    Location:
    New York, NY
    #1
    What does everyone think about the difference between 20" and 24" iMac's? Im thinking about getting an iMac real soon. It appears that they are in the middle of their product cycle.
     
  2. andrew upstairs macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2009
    Location:
    Downtown Los Angeles
    #2
    24" all the way. 20" is just too small for a desktop, IMO.
     
  3. Hellhammer Moderator

    Hellhammer

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2008
    Location:
    Finland
    #3
    Definitely 24". I love mine! No reason to go for 20" over 24"
     
  4. flopticalcube macrumors G4

    flopticalcube

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    In the velcro closure of America's Hat
    #4
    Desk space should be the only consideration for the 20" these days. The 24" contains all the best options and has a beautiful screen.
     
  5. Sebby macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2008
    Location:
    London, UK
    #5
    Definitely go for the 24". It seems ridiculously huge at first, but you'll soon adjust. :D
     
  6. AAPLaday Guest

    AAPLaday

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    #6
    I think the 20 inch iMac is plenty big enough, particularly if your coming from a macbook or any other laptop. If you can afford the 24 inch then go for that one but a 20inch iMac is by no means a bad thing :p
     
  7. mgridgaway macrumors 6502

    mgridgaway

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    #7
    20" is just fine for many people, though if I go the iMac route next time I think it'll be for a 24".

    What are you using it for? If you want to do any sort of real gaming (via bootcamp or whatever) then you really have no choice but the get a higher end 24", which is quite an annoyance.
     
  8. Gaelic2 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Mountains of N. California
    #8
    I have had two 20" iMacs and recently decided to go for the 24". I am very pleased with the "24. The screen is beautiful and has lots of space for several programs. You would be kicking yourself down the line if you buy the 20":D
     
  9. TRAG macrumors 6502

    TRAG

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2009
    Location:
    Louisiana, USA
    #9
    I don't have an iMac, but if I did I'd choose the 24". I think it'd give you more a TV feeling if you ever decide to watch movies. They do seem huge at first. But why not go ahead and get the biggest.
     
  10. trip1ex macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    #10
    20" here.

    Advantages of 20"?

    Brightness can be turned down quite a bit more than 24". Great for nighttime computing. 24" brightness can be overwhelming at night.

    20" uses significantly less energy.

    Easier to transport. I move mine down to the kitchen table often.

    It's cheaper. And just as fast.

    Greater pixel density on the 20".

    Everything is more front and center with 20". 24" isn't quite big enough to get 2 webpages side by side either so the extra space is mostly wasted. And extra size can feel a bit too much.

    I had a 24" and went back to 20".

    Don't miss it except for the occasional movie I suppose. But most of that is done on my TV.
     
  11. rgarjr macrumors 603

    rgarjr

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2009
    Location:
    Southern Calif
  12. niuniu macrumors 68020

    niuniu

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    A man of the people. The right sort of people.
    #12
    Being a laptop user I'd go for 24 as it'd be nice to have a significantly bigger screen for a change.

    That said, I wouldn't knock the 20inch, it's plenty big and beautiful too. I'd be very happy with a 20inch iMac.
     
  13. adamfishercox macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2007
    #13
    The 20" is plenty big for regular use, but the quality of the screen is shoddy. +1 for 24"
     
  14. durhamj macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    #14
    Go 24"

    If you can afford, go for the 24".

    If plan on doing alot of photo editing with something other than iPhoto, go 24".

    As already mentioned the screen is bright at its lowest setting, but check out a software add-on called "screen shade" to turn down the brightness even more.

    If you are as old as me, (bi-focal age,:eek: ) plan on getting a new subscription, just for the big screen.
    zennioptical.com
     
  15. crazycat macrumors 65816

    crazycat

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2005
    #15
    I have used both so i might be of some help here. I would recommend that you go for the 24" model for 3 main reasons.

    1- The both have about the same footprint, although the 24" is larger they will both fit in the same place on the desk.

    2- The 24" model will be faster.

    3- The extra screen space makes a big difference.
     
  16. trip1ex macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    #16


    1. Well they don't have the same footprint. The 24" is wider and taller. And thus the 20" can't fit into the same space. IT's not a 2 or 3x difference, but there is a significant difference. I also found that I wanted to push the 24" farther back on my desk because of its size.

    2. 24" isn't faster unless you step up to the $1799 pricepoint. $1499 24" iMac has same cpu and gpu as the 20" iMac.

    3. This isn't something that I've found. It does depend on what you do. My wife and I mostly surf or email or use iPhoto or play the occasional game. I do some home movie editing once in awhile. And use Office or iWork. I think folks that need a larger screen space know that they need it. Those who have to ask probably don't need it.
     
  17. kurzz macrumors 6502

    kurzz

    Joined:
    May 18, 2007
    Location:
    Canada
    #17
    Absolutely get the 24". I had one and it had an amazing screen (compared to the 20"). If you're in for a desktop machine,why not go all out and get the larger screen? It's not likely you'll carry that thing around much, in terms of weight/size.
     
  18. senseless macrumors 68000

    senseless

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2008
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, USA
    #18
    I sampled both size Imacs and definitely preferred the 20" over the 24" model. I may have misused the big one by opening GIANT windows of each application. It might be better used to have multiple normal size windows open at the same time.
     
  19. atomicshark macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2007
    Location:
    New York
    #19
    Exactly. If the 20" had the same quality (color gamut/viewing angle) as the 24" and the same processor/video options I would have gone with the 20" to save some money.

    Personally I love my 24" iMac. The screen is what kept me from buying a new Macbook Pro. Yes, it's that good!
     
  20. cz3ch macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    #20
    I'd say go for the 24". But I'd honestly buy the 24" 2.8Ghz model in the Apple Refurb section. It's $1,199USD. Great deal on a smoking machine!
     
  21. ditzy macrumors 68000

    ditzy

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2007
    #21
    If you have the room and money for the 24 inch that definitely the way to go.
     
  22. vw1300 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2008
    #22
    I bought the base model 20" last year and am happy with it - then again the 24" models were a lot more expensive then. If your budget and space allows it, get the big screen.

    If I were buying a new one now, I'd still get a 20" screen - frankly, I don't need the 24" for light photo/video editing and the usual family stuff - but I would special order one with the bigger hard drive and number pad keyboard.
     

Share This Page