Well, the good news is that it won't be available by 2028, rather much later so they have time to think about it. Plant 2 by 2028.So what is this fab going to make if it's restricted to 4 nm and larger and won't be operational until 2028?
Well, the good news is that it won't be available by 2028, rather much later so they have time to think about it. Plant 2 by 2028.So what is this fab going to make if it's restricted to 4 nm and larger and won't be operational until 2028?
Not sure about cost, but there’s a point to diversifying. Apple has been wanting to diversify production/suppliers for years. Not for political theatre, but hedging for political(and other) turmoil.
Trump will be into his fourth term by then.I’d just like to point out the turnaround time here: six years. For one single plant.
Not theator, accounting, real estate is expensive in Taiwan, so it is cheaper to buy low-cost desert land in AZ and build the plant there. These chips are so small that shipping them around the world is cheap.Let me get this straight. The chips will be made here and then shipped back to China for assembly. And that’s more cost effective?
Or is this all political theatre?
Both parties are appeasing the electorate.Plans for this factory started before this administration.
100 billion is not political theater at all.Let me get this straight. The chips will be made here and then shipped back to China for assembly. And that’s more cost effective?
Or is this all political theatre?
EXACTLY.
Another Foxconn in the U.S.A.
A political move to appease the current administration.
The only things I’d be objecting to (if anything at all) would be claims that Trump should get credit for a plant that’s been planned since 2022, or that this in any way currently affects present economic conditions in the country (beyond construction). Being somewhat familiar with the current administration’s penchant for pretentious big wins (like Bondi’s idiotic claim today that Trump has saved 258 million lives in the USA so far this year), I’d like to see his fans be a tad more realistic, that’s all. 😉
I said (as you must know) that my objection was to Trump getting credit for a plant that was announced in 2022, as the Fine Article we’re all talking about says about the second plant. Your links are talking about a plant announced in 2020, which (as we all know) is not 2022 (as the Fine Article is talking about with respect to the second plant, as I have already pointed out).I didn't know Biden was in office in May 2020:
![]()
TSMC Plans $12 Billion U.S. Chip Plant in Victory for Trump
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. plans to spend $12 billion building a chip plant in Arizona, a decision designed to allay U.S. national security concerns and shift more high-tech manufacturing to America.www.bloomberg.com
U.S. Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross Praises Plans by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) to Build Semiconductor Facility in Arizona
U.S. Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross praised today’s announcement by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) of plans to invest approximately $12 billion to construct a new 5-nanometer semiconductor production facility in Arizona. This manufacturing facility will be one of only two...2017-2021.commerce.gov
Governor Ducey Announces Global Industry Leader TSMC to Build Advanced Semiconductor Factory in Arizona
The Arizona Commerce Authority (ACA) is the state's leading economic development organization with a streamlined mission to grow and strengthen Arizona’s economy.www.azcommerce.com
----
Media took the story, made it all about Biden a few years later, and there you go.
Biden-Harris Administration Announces CHIPS Incentives Award with TSMC Arizona to Secure U.S. Leadership in Advanced Semiconductor Technology
CHIPS Investment Incentivizes Creation of Leading-Edge Cluster in Phoenix, Arizona, and Over 20,000 Jobs; and Includes Commitment to Produce A16 Technologywww.commerce.gov
Probably things like cellular modems and SoCs for lower end embedded systems like HomePods, etc.So what is this fab going to make if it's restricted to 4 nm and larger and won't be operational until 2028?
How can Taiwan forbid AMSL from exporting their chip tech to other countries?Meanwhile, Taiwan is forbidding the outsourcing of the newest technology by law: https://9meters.com/technology/new-taiwan-law-blocks-tsmc-from-giving-advanced-chip-tech-to-u-s
“At the heart of this restriction is the newly revised Industrial Innovation Act, which introduces an “N-1” policy. This rule mandates that any semiconductor manufacturing technology deployed abroad must be at least one generation behind what is currently allowed for production in Taiwan.”
Congratulations, you can do math.I’d just like to point out the turnaround time here: six years. For one single plant.
Maybe you can apply your keen eye for such details to discerning why I might think that’s important. 😉Congratulations, you can do math.
Not AMSL, but TSMC. AMSL “only” makes the lithography machines. You can’t replicate what TSMC does just by buying AMSL machinery.How can Taiwan forbid AMSL from exporting their chip tech to other countries?
So what is this fab going to make if it's restricted to 4 nm and larger and won't be operational until 2028?
I have no idea why people in the comments are objecting to American jobs coming back to America. Thank you Apple and TSMC. Whatever work you are doing in America is giving people jobs.
The only things I’d be objecting to (if anything at all) would be claims that Trump should get credit for a plant that’s been planned since 2022, or that this in any way currently affects present economic conditions in the country (beyond construction). Being somewhat familiar with the current administration’s penchant for pretentious big wins (like Bondi’s idiotic claim today that Trump has saved 258 million lives in the USA so far this year), I’d like to see his fans be a tad more realistic, that’s all. 😉
that's not a lot of timeI’d just like to point out the turnaround time here: six years. For one single plant.
It’s long enough a) to predate Trump, and b) to have zero effect on the economy (outside the construction industry) until the very end of his term, though.that's not a lot of time
Yes, for many years.All of this stuff has been in the works for years.
Maybe we should stop defending them then. We just gave them 8 billion dollars recently for defense and now they want to give us an inferior product.Meanwhile, Taiwan is forbidding the outsourcing of the newest technology by law: https://9meters.com/technology/new-taiwan-law-blocks-tsmc-from-giving-advanced-chip-tech-to-u-s
“At the heart of this restriction is the newly revised Industrial Innovation Act, which introduces an “N-1” policy. This rule mandates that any semiconductor manufacturing technology deployed abroad must be at least one generation behind what is currently allowed for production in Taiwan.”
Wait until you look up pears.Let me get this straight. The chips will be made here and then shipped back to China for assembly. And that’s more cost effective?
Or is this all political theatre?