None sense. Giving away apples intellectual property to third party is theft, not innovation.
None sense. Giving away apples intellectual property to third party is theft, not innovation.
The eu is giving it away, playing Robin Hood.It’s not theft if you are giving it away yourself.
The EU is giving away nothing. Apple is opening up their platform to 3rd party services as required by law.The eu is giving it away, playing Robin Hood.
Correct and the law(or the eu which is playing Robin Hood) is making Apple give away their ip. I feel like this has been a discussion point over the last two years and thousands of posts.The EU is giving away nothing. Apple is opening up their platform to 3rd party services as required by law.
The EU is not making Apple do anything. Apple has every choice in this to exercise their "pullout game" like the lot of you like to argue.Correct and the law(or the eu which is playing Robin Hood) is making Apple give away their ip. I feel like this has been a discussion point over the last two years and thousands of posts.
No matter what exceptional product the iPods could have been, they would never significantly shift users from Windows to Mac, because Microsoft's monopoly on desktops was (and is) too strong.I don't understand why Apple would want to lock AirPods features anyway. Why not sell more sets by letting people use their full feature set with Androids?
When iPods first came out, you could only sync them with Macs. After they blew up, Apple came to their senses and put out iTunes for Windows and sold that many more iPods as a result. I don't see how this is any different. After all, if you buy a pair of AirPods and find they're great (which they are), wouldn't you be tempted to check out more Apple products? Same with Apple Watch.
The eu is absolutely making Apple do this. I feel all american tech should leave the eu and let eu tech fill the gap. But in reality none of that is happening and the eu knows it and is forcing Apple to give away its ip.The EU is not making Apple do anything. Apple has every choice in this to exercise their "pullout game" like the lot of you like to argue.
Yes it’s taking from one and giving to another. Exactly what the DMA is doing.You do know the story of Robin Hood is that of rich people hoarding food for themselves while leaving the poor to starve right? Robs the rich to give to the poor, opposing the tyrannical rule of unjust lords and sheriffs. So even in your own defense of Apple you are calling them tyrannical overlords who are hoarding riches for themselves and leaving the poor to starve.
Fascinating.
The eu is absolutely making Apple do this. I feel all american tech should leave the eu and let eu tech fill the gap. But in reality none of that is happening and the eu knows it and is forcing Apple to give away its ip.
Yes it’s taking from one and giving to another. Exactly what the DMA is doing.
You’re right, cook won’t give up a shekel. But good for him. Our portfolios benefit.Absolute bollocks. Apple could shut down their EU operations today..they are not forced to stay.
We all know they won't because with Cook at the helm, the money they get from the EU > anything and everything else.
If EU tech stopped serving American companies Apple would seize to exist.The eu is absolutely making Apple do this. I feel all american tech should leave the eu and let eu tech fill the gap.
None of that is happening because that was not even a possibility but fanatic ramblings on forums. In reality, a country determines how businesses gets to operate within it, not the other way around.But in reality none of that is happening and the eu knows it and is forcing Apple to give away its ip.
So the EU being Robin Hood is taking from Apple the tyrannical overlord in your analogy, to give to the poor 3rd party services.Yes it’s taking from one and giving to another. Exactly what the DMA is doing.
Even though the bolded is phrased in a sarcastic, hyperbolic manner the essence of it is true.If EU tech stopped serving American companies Apple would seize to exist.
None of that is happening because that was not even a possibility but fanatic ramblings on forums. In reality, a country determines how businesses gets to operate within it, not the other way around.
So the EU being Robin Hood is taking from Apple the tyrannical overlord in your analogy, to give to the poor 3rd party services.
Did you not use Robin Hood as your analogy? I'm just using your own analogy. What fascinates me is that you are on the side of the tyrant in your Robin Hood analogy.Even though the bolded is phrased in a sarcastic, hyperbolic manner the essence of it is true.
What fascinates me is you seem to be on the side of the tyrant, the eu, playing Robin Hood euphemistically.Did you not use Robin Hood as your analogy? I'm just using your own analogy. What fascinates me is that you are on the side of the tyrant in your Robin Hood analogy.
You think Apple’s stock would tank if AirPods worked better with non-Apple hardware?You’re right, cook won’t give up a shekel. But good for him. Our portfolios benefit.
Meh. I'm not rooting my Z Fold to use a set of Airpods.
Yeah Apple might be interested in stopping this since it's on rooted devices. Could pose a security risk to Find My.Do not root your device for this as it destroys all Android safety features guarding your encrypted data. With an unlocked bootloader the lock screen is no longer preventing access and as of 2025 there are tools out there that will copy off all the device data with an unlocked bootloader.
Yeah Apple might be interested in stopping this since it's on rooted devices. Could pose a security risk to Find My.
So which features work without rooting? The article only says that OnePlus/Oppo users have access to some features without rooting. Many of us are on Samsung devices.You only need to root for select features. The rest is available without.