You need a stronger wife.I have the 9.7 and love it but am going to buy the mini for the wife so it can easily fit in her purse. I think mini will be a hit in the women's market due to ease of carrying.
You need a stronger wife.
It does obviously depend on what work you do, but I agree that the iPad is mostly a device for consumption.....
Just? Well, that takes up most of my professional life.
I was not saying that gadgets make you a pro. I was saying that the iPad is a device that people can use to get work done, and in my opinion, the smaller they make it, the less work you can get done on it. Maybe it's a toy for you at any size, but for me, this is the device I use to make a living.
Once reason I gave up on the iToys for notetaking was how do you reposition the cursor? It's horrible, you touch a point and get sort of close, try to drag your finger a bit. It's so bad, I'd rather leave my typos and mistakes in place and try to fix it later from the desk top of just delete if it's only a line back. Just thinking about writing anything substantive on an iToy makes me cringe.
That's one example. There's many more and I only used it for about a week.
But seeing how the iPad can be used for many different types of tasks, and how even in my own use case, some tasks can be performed adequately on the mini while others can't, I'm thinking that there will likely be people who prefer the mini size, and there will be people who prefer the current size, so both will sell well, and both sizes will likely co-exist for a long time.
They put a man on the moon And the Space Shuttle into space with less computing power.
The iPad is a computer. Just doesn't have the horsepower of today's computers.
But certainly people did a ton of work on computers not any more powerful not too long ago.
----------
Another big drawback of the 7" is going to be worse battery life right? Or no?
half the screen but half the battery size means less battery life as screen is only one drain, albeit a big one, on battery life. I also imagine that a 7" screen isn't quite 1/2 the power consumption as a 10" screen.
They're called laptops. We create best with cursor and keyboards.
What part of my statement is confusing you? Writing is a form of "media creation." The iPad is a "tool." Being able to write something from the initial draft to the final, published product on a tablet makes it "powerful."Maybe so, but even if that's your only use for it, how in the world is that a "powerful media creation tool"? Clearly you don't need such a tool which is fine and I'm happy to hear you enjoy your iPad so much, but that does not make it a "powerful media creation tool" no matter how much you love it.
I produce as much or more on my iPad as I do on my MBA.I don't know what kind of writing you're referring to, but journalism/professional reviews/articles/novels, someone with a laptop will crush you. They will just be able to create and distribute content so much faster than you, your head will be spinning.
A bluetooth external keyboard (I recommend Apple's) enables you to use shortcut keys, which make the mouse unnecessary. I say this as someone who used to complain loudly, even on these forums, about the inability to use a mouse with the iPad. That is, until one of our fellow forum members schooled me, and I realized that I didn't need a mouse after all.Once reason I gave up on the iToys for notetaking was how do you reposition the cursor? It's horrible, you touch a point and get sort of close, try to drag your finger a bit. It's so bad, I'd rather leave my typos and mistakes in place and try to fix it later from the desk top of just delete if it's only a line back. Just thinking about writing anything substantive on an iToy makes me cringe.
I encourage you to read a bit more on the forums before you rush to judgment about the iPad or your fellow forum members. I have been working on the iPad for a couple of years, so I know what I am talking about. And, it is not just me. YOU might not be able to imagine how to use the iPad as a content-creation device, but I can assure you that many OTHERS have.That's one example. There's many more and I only used it for about a week.
In my opinion there's no room for 2 sizes in tablet market to be both equally successful, especially coming from the same company. There will be one winner and if iPad mini will not cannibalize larger iPad totally, it will kick it out of the throne for sure. As for productivity usage, there's really no difference for me between 7,8" and 9,7". Some else could as well say that 9.7" is crap compared to 12" tablets. Truth is anything larger than 6" is comfortable for reading and typing and thats two most important things when it comes to productivity. I see most people who voted "no way" are the ones who own 9.7" iPad or recently purchased one and just don't want deal with or are in fear of the fact that the new king is coming so their newly obtained tablet won't be as much hyped anymore... Tommorrow everyone will be talking about 7,8" inch tablet, not the 9,7" one. If everything goes right and the iPad mini won't be a disaster, it will easily succeed and then if 9.7" iPad survives, it will be second best.Returning to the topic, I think that there will be people who find their work easier to do on a larger iPad than on a smaller one, so the 9.7" version will stick around. I think the number of people like this is probably quite large, but I suppose only market research teams have data to back this assertion up.
In my opinion there's no room for 2 sizes in tablet market to be both equally successful, especially coming from the same company. There will be one winner and if iPad mini will not cannibalize larger iPad totally, it will kick it out of the throne for sure. As for productivity usage, there's really no difference for me between 7,8" and 9,7". Some else could as well say that 9.7" is crap compared to 12" tablets. Truth is anything larger than 6" is comfortable for reading and typing and thats two most important things when it comes to productivity. I see most people who voted "no way" are the ones who own 9.7" iPad or recently purchased one and just don't want deal with or are in fear of the fact that the new king is coming so their newly obtained tablet won't be as much hyped anymore... Tommorrow everyone will be talking about 7,8" inch tablet, not the 9,7" one. If everything goes right and the iPad mini won't be a disaster, it will easily succeed and then if 9.7" iPad survives, it will be second best.
It may survive. It's just won't be the most successful bestseller anymore.i don't know anything about kings or other royalty, but i'd say interest in the larger ipad will remain.
It may survive. It's just won't be the most successful bestseller anymore.
4" iPod touch is nowhere near the size of nearly 8" tablet. Two completely different devices. That device isn't the touch, it's an iPad 9,7", that's why it's going to be cannibalized - to what point only time will tell, but it's pretty clear current gen iPad sales will shrink the moment iPad mini comes out. That 20% of cannibalizaion you reffereing to is only based on initial iPad mini sales prognostics. In time, if the mini succeeds, it will be even worse for it's bigger brother. I understand some people, especially the ones who invested in iPad 2 or iPad 3 are threatened by the iPad mini potential of dominance in Apple's tablet category. Just because the support will not be as long as anyone can expect or the larger iPad will no longer be the main focus of development for Apple. But you know what, the times have changed and so is the market. "Pro users" I was reffering to are the people who use an iPad occasionally for some work/business and for them I agree larger device is better. There's Microsoft Slate tablet coming just around the corner who will strongly compete with iPad on workability level, but that's a different story. However I believe most people use their tablets for fun, media consumption purposes and web browsing. For that most people more compact, lightweight and cheaper tablet can be a lot better in just about every aspect.You said the iPad would be "outsold" by the Mini, the Mini would "cannibalize" it, it would become a "pro" device, and it would rise in price.
I have tried to explain why I think this doesn't make sense: we already have several iPods, including one quite close in size to the Mini. Others have said that in many respects, the jump to the iPad is superior in terms of content consumption. I have pushed the idea that the larger iPad is better for content creation as well. I think people have made a good case for why the current iPad is doing so well.
What have you offered us to bolster your claims? As far as I can tell, no one in the marketing world is expecting more than a 20% cannibalization of sales. So, the iPad will remain 80% of the tablets that Apple sells. Of course there is cannibalization, so you are right on that, but everything else seems off to me.
I think there is a market for the Mini, but not the large one you see, and I am wondering if you have any evidence to convince us otherwise. Maybe it was in the thread, but I just missed it.
I am not terribly talented at prognostication, but the scenario you describe seems unlikely to me. Something tells me that if the Mini was really that great, then Apple would have gone with it before they made the iPad.
What I think we are seeing is a retrenchment of sorts by Apple as they realize that they need to deal with the rise of the minis elsewhere (Fires and Nexus), but nothing innovative or market-changing, as far as I can tell.
4" iPod touch is nowhere near the size of nearly 8" tablet. Two completely different devices. That device isn't the touch, it's an iPad 9,7", that's why it's going to be cannibalized - to what point only time will tell, but it's pretty clear current gen iPad sales will shrink the moment iPad mini comes out. That 20% of cannibalizaion you reffereing to is only based on initial iPad mini sales prognostics. In time, if the mini succeeds, it will be even worse for it's bigger brother. I understand some people, especially the ones who invested in iPad 2 or iPad 3 are threatened by the iPad mini potential of dominance in Apple's tablet category. Just because the support will not be as long as anyone can expect or the larger iPad will no longer be the main focus of development for Apple. But you know what, the times have changed and so is the market. "Pro users" I was reffering to are the people who use an iPad occasionally for some work/business and for them I agree larger device is better. There's Microsoft Slate tablet coming just around the corner who will strongly compete with iPad on workability level, but that's a different story. However I believe most people use their tablets for fun, media consumption purposes and web browsing. For that most people more compact, lightweight and cheaper tablet can be a lot better in just about every aspect.
What part of my statement is confusing you? Writing is a form of "media creation." The iPad is a "tool." Being able to write something from the initial draft to the final, published product on a tablet makes it "powerful."
A bluetooth external keyboard (I recommend Apple's)
Obviously, there are certain kinds of work that don't fare well on the iPad because of the form factor or various iOS restrictions. Writing happens to be one of those tasks that is probably best-suited to the device, provided your writing falls within the parameters of what PagesYou'll even come right out and say it but you're too blinded by apple-awe to finish the thought. The iPad is well-suited for a limited form of writing. You just said it. I agree with you. How do you make the leap from a limited form of writing that falls within the parameters of what pages can do to a powerful media creation tool? You've just said it's a very limited media creation tool.
The mental gymnastics you're willing to attempt just to avoid admitting facts you've come right out and said is staggering.
Close your eyes, take a deep breath, and come to accept that every single apple product doesn't have to be the best tool for every possible task.
I encourage you to read a bit more on the forums before you rush to judgment about the iPad or your fellow forum members.
Funny, I find most of the posters here to be intelligent articulate people with well-stated points. Is that a rush judgement about them? I gave you far too much benefit of the doubt before reaching my conclusions about you, that can hardly be called a rush judgement. I guess it's just easier for the close-minded to make silly and unwarranted dismissals than try to consider a fact they've already acknowledged within their rusty world-view.
I have been working on the iPad for a couple of years, so I know what I am talking about.
One would have thought so, yes. What a pity you can't let facts intrude on what you want to believe. Just think how much more you could have accomplished in the past few years with proper tools.
....Just think how much more you could have accomplished in the past few years with proper tools.