It’s wild that this is only becoming news now. I remember being in an Amazon conference room about four years ago with some of the team responsible for these transcriptions and listening to a recording of a mom and little kid talking.
I don't completely disagree with you, but realistically can you expect a company not to listen to the recordings when developing advanced machine learning algorithms for voice commands? Also, I think the employees sharing them in a private chat for help and amusement is a forgivable offense.Disgusting.
I received a free Echo Dot when moving into my current building, tried it out a couple times, and almost immediately sold it.
Guess we can install a small array of microphone around your house so that you can even better enjoy using the smart speaker because your voice will be captured in high quality Dolby Surround format.I stand with Amazon. They are an honest company run by an honest man. I have nothing to hide. They have no agenda other than to deliver the best speaker with the best voice assistant, which, I might add, is something Apple FAILED to do with the HomePod. And we all know how shady Apple is. Their privacy stance is a farce.
Privacy is basically a fallacy nowadays. My mindset right now is where I go, what do I eat, what am I doing, all are known by government. The only thing matters is whether govt want to actually use those information or not.Why do people taking privacy on the internet so seriously? LOL... I never understand any of this outrageous... it seems to me that people just realized that big corporations and government sucks out all the information it can. Welcome to the age of internet and welcome to the connected world. I am seriously can’t believe any of these news surpising nor I remotely care.
Just not getting the outrage
That is creepy and borderline illegal.
Amazon: it’s you customer want such a “smart speaker”. We build one. Now you blame me creating such an illegal device?I don’t care what it hidden in the 374th page of the TOS, this kind of stuff should be considered wire tapping and extremely illegal.
Yes. It's in the accessibility settings.Is there an option to enable voice recordings to be sent to Apple when the user says "Goddammit Siri you suck!"
But of course. Selective outrage is part and parcel of any discussion here…Despite the article clearly saying Apple, Google, & Amazon I see a lot of selective reading and commenting here, not that I expected anything else.
EVERY COMPANY DOES IT! That means Apple, Google, Amazon, and whoever else has a smart speaker, if you think otherwise you're only fooling yourself. And no I don't want to hear your excuse about how you "think" one company does it better or different because honestly you don't know what these companies do behind your back while telling you they don't.
Do you not use any Amazon or Google product or service? A lot of people say this, but use Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Google Search, Amazon, etc. So your data isn't really that private if you use these, even with an iPhone.
Comical. People laugh at Apple for not having good "Machine learning" / voice assistance when it's really just other companies sucking every byte of personal data to make the "user experience" better.
I stand with Amazon. They are an honest company run by an honest man. I have nothing to hide. They have no agenda other than to deliver the best speaker with the best voice assistant, which, I might add, is something Apple FAILED to do with the HomePod. And we all know how shady Apple is. Their privacy stance is a farce.
I have mixed feelings about it. Privacy is important but on the other side Siri works so bad because of so Apple’s privacy policy.
Not sure I completely see it from your point of view.I laughed so hard, I peed. Thank you!
Well dduuurrrrrrrr
...
[doublepost=1554961312][/doublepost]Haha the sheer number of complainers defending Apple on here, who have NOT read this story and totally missed the following is hilarious!
Apple has employees who listen to Siri queries to make sure the interpretation of a request lines up with what the person said. Recordings are stripped of identifiable information, however, and stored for six months with a random identifier.
[doublepost=1554961461][/doublepost]
But Apple ARE doing this? You didn’t read the story did you....
Incredibly unacceptable. What the hell is wrong with these large tech companies completely trampling on customer privacy.
Nope. Are you so dependent on them that it’s hard for you to imagine not?Interesting, so no Amazon Prime, Amazon Video, Google Search, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc.?