Many actors are out of a job most of the time then some when they've really made it choose what they want. Their accountants handle their taxes and usually find ways to pay very little tax as possible. As they can afford the best to get around the system.
so you're defending this position that it isn't a 'real job'? based on what - the schedule/financial situation of A-list actors? so i guess Billy the line cook doesn't have a real job because "gordon ramsey"..?
does being successful at acting after [x] amount of years negate the hard work they did studying acting/ trying out endlessly for parts or roles they mostly get rejected from? i don't understand your logic.