Okay but what does the contract actually say? The Union claim is that it requires equal treatment, of which this would be a violation of. It may be that the contract requires the *option* of severance if a new store doesn’t open within 50 miles, not that it requires only offering severance.
I do not know that any of us here have seen the contract, and I doubt the IAM would willingly hand any of us a copy. But who knows?
"Equal treatment", in my days in a union, always meant that all employees were treated the same in a union shop. In short, the boss should not give you and me a miniature screwdriver unless the boss also gives everyone else one. That is an actual example that happened in my shop when our boss returned from a field trip with manufacturing reps, who gave him two screwdrivers. When he entered the door, he handed them to the first two people he saw. Another union member got enraged and filed a grievance about unfair and unequal treatment. They bought him a screwdriver.
Severance pay is given for termination that is caused by company actions, such as a reduction in force, for any reason. Severance pay usually comes with stipulations that depend on what was bargained for. Apparently, in this case, the employees get severance pay, plus the chance at first refusal for a position in any new store opened within 50 miles, and 18 months. The contract, apparently, is not written so that the store closure automatically guarantees employees positions at other open stores.
I became quite good at understanding contract language and interpreting contracts. We had contracts that built upon each previous contract. Plus, as there were mergers and acquisitions and union members from other unions joining the group, there were a lot of LOAs and MOUs attached to each contract. As this was, as far as I know, the first contract for this Apple store, the contract was probably very easy to read and interpret. I would love to see a copy, but I am certain I will never get that chance.
Thus, if what we know about the contract is correct, the employees have no reason to expect equal treatment with respect to other unionized or non-union stores. Their treatment, so it appears, is based on a CBA that stipulates severance and a right of first refusal.