Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
"US Attorney for the Northern District of California David Anderson said Sheppard “faces a statutory maximum penalty of 45 years of imprisonment” if convicted"

I'm not American. How often does people get the maximum penalty? Or is it just as likely that they get 1 year or 5 years? I assume 45 years is just the maximum penalty for this category of crime?

He wouldn't get that high, it's more like the US Attorney calculating the sentence if he found guilty on all accusations. It's likely he will get much less than that number.
 
Yeah but he did manage to hack into these notable accounts, this was a crafty move that took both guts and skill. My guess is when all is said and done the feds will be very interested in his talents.
He didn't "hack" anything. He used social engineering on a twitter employee in order to get access to internal tools. Probably tools that allows them to change the email address on accounts. That is not hacking anything. Hacking or vulnerability exploitation is something entirely different. That is something that requires serious skill and knowledge with regards to bug finding, reverse engineering and exploitation tools and techniques. Something that clearly wasn't the case here.

This would also require Twitter to be liable for security holes in their systems.
 
Last edited:
Nope that's appropriate. This kid is a thief, tried to steal peoples crypto by using famous accounts. He should be treated as such.
Do you truly think it’s worthy of such a potential heavy sentence compared to say like the woman who killed a young boy but is being protected by the US justice system?

Sure a punishment is required, but it should be appropriate I think. Nobody died, and there weren’t even great financial losses. Having a criminal record is for those involved already a life sentence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spectrum
GOOD. Put his ass under the jail. This way hackers will learn that the nonsense they do has consequences, and they’ll stop acting like comic book super-villains.

put his ass under the jail? Lol what are you really trying to say by that lol. That’s not a typo lol.

anywho ... I wonder if the minor can press civil charges against the press that printed his name if it’s illegal as a minor to do so? He’d have some legitimate funds if won whilst he’s in the penitentiary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
Kids do stupid stuff and should be punished - but give him life sentence? Are you mad? He might as well just kill himself as his life is over for this.
Is that a punishment that fits the crime?

Shouldn't most of your politicians be in prison along with people from wall street (aka 2008)? And those committed much worse than this kid.

Wow, I'm in disbelief!
Wholeheartedly agree... many other sorts of known public thievery for amounts of orders of magnitude higher than this one went totally lenient and not to mention even rewarded at times. It makes this one feel like a prank in comparison.

I’m not saying let him run free, but such a harsh sentence at the same time.

Reminds me of this woman that gave birth, murdered and buried her newborn yet... ok fine completely different sort of case.
 
He didn't "hack" anything. He used social engineering on a twitter employee in order to get access to internal tools. Probably tools that allows them to change the email address on accounts. That is not hacking anything. Hacking or vulnerability exploitation is something entirely different. That is something that requires serious skill and knowledge with regards to bug finding, reverse engineering and exploitation tools and techniques. Something that clearly wasn't the case here.
Yes, social engineering can be an integral part of hacking, and this kid used it expertly to gain access to these accounts. Your opinion of him and his actions doesn’t change the fact that he pulled it off.
 
Yes, social engineering can be an integral part of hacking, and this kid used it expertly to gain access to these accounts. Your opinion of him and his actions doesn’t change the fact that he pulled it off.
Social engineering is not part of hacking. I also never questioned the guy's ability to pull it off, so why bring it into the discussion?

From the "Hacker" Wiki:

Hacker on Wikipedia said:
A computer hacker is any skilled computer expert who uses their technical knowledge to overcome a problem. While "hacker" can refer to any skilled computer programmer, the term has become associated in popular culture with a "security hacker", someone who, with their technical knowledge, uses bugs or exploits to break into computer systems.
 
Social engineering is not part of hacking. I also never questioned the guy's ability to pull it off, so why bring it into the discussion?

From the "Hacker" Wiki:
Sorry, ignoring this as a part of the process just shows how little one understands it.
 
some VPNs dont have an issue with reporting IP addresses that use their services, and do log activity.

some VPNs, do not. the information of which do and which do not is readily available
Oh yes, this info is available, but history shows that it can't be trusted as all VPN's give out this info after a court order.
 
He got caught by using a "private" VPN service. Which, wasn't so private against the government after all.

From the website arstechnica.(dot) com today,

The attackers then called the employees and used the information obtained from LinkedIn and other public sources to convince them they were authorized Twitter personnel. Work-at-home arrangements caused by the COVID-19 pandemic also prevented the employees from using normal procedures such as face-to-face contact to verify the identities of the callers.

With the confidence of the targeted employees, the attackers directed them to a phishing page that mimicked an internal Twitter VPN. The attackers then obtained credentials as the targeted employees entered them. To bypass two-factor authentication protections Twitter has in place, the attackers entered the credentials into the real Twitter VPN portal within seconds of the employees entering their info into the fake one. Once the employee entered the one-time password, the attackers were in.
 
Also 45 years seems like a punishment for committing murder, imagine being 19 just about to start your life after leaving school(might be still in school) then getting a sentence where you get out at 64 years old ready to die...just because you thought it was exciting to get some bitcoin which amount to what? $100k?
It was $100k because Twitter stopped it so fast. What if Twitter wasn't so fast? Is $1M ok? $2M?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hamiltonrwatch
It was $100k because Twitter stopped it so fast. What if Twitter wasn't so fast? Is $1M ok? $2M?
Either way, 45 years is completely unreasonable. Depending on their criminal history, I would say maybe 4 years with 3 suspended or something like that.

Which will make them walk on egg shells for a while after they're released.
 
Do you truly think it’s worthy of such a potential heavy sentence compared to say like the woman who killed a young boy but is being protected by the US justice system?

Sure a punishment is required, but it should be appropriate I think. Nobody died, and there weren’t even great financial losses. Having a criminal record is for those involved already a life sentence.
I don't agree with that much of course, but there should be appropriate consequences of such action. If it was just hacking it would be up to Twitter, but he tried to scam people and take their money.
 
Either way, 45 years is completely unreasonable. Depending on their criminal history, I would say maybe 4 years with 3 suspended or something like that.

Which will make them walk on egg shells for a while after they're released.
He’s not convicted, and it’s up to 45 years. I don’t see why we need to debate the 45 years before we see how it goes for him.
 
He’s not convicted, and it’s up to 45 years. I don’t see why we need to debate the 45 years before we see how it goes for him.
I know he hasn't been sentenced yet. However it is already ridiculous that 45 years could be levied against someone for that those particular charges alone. Perhaps these types of charges are used for any type of crime in that category no matter the amount stolen and therefore giving it some room for people who commit a potential cyber heist or something haha.
 
But at the same time, the charge to a killer killing one man could be “what if he kills 10 other people in the scene” or “he could’ve killed 50 more people also at that shopping mall”. Instead of appropriate charges, the court would charge the killer “attempts of killing 50 other people in the vicinity”. The mindset like you just described would mean any criminal, such as thief stealing a couple chocolate bars in a shop should be charged Lifetime sentence because “he could’ve stolen everything in that shop”.

Granted, the crime committed by that teenager has the potential to be worse than what has published in the newspaper, but such “what if” mindset would mean every single human in our society should be charged life sentence or death sentence as long as any crime is committed, such as speeding. However, our society does not put someone in jail just because someone is speeding, but does when his speeding also causes crashes and injures.

I dont know if you heard about China installing surveillance cameras all over the place and uses AI to identify any “potential crime” based on someone’s behaviour. That System seemed working pretty well at identifying potential criminal and allow law enforcement to ”proactively prevent crime”. The sentiment of this comment section sets a perfect stage for such proactive system to be in place and mass surveillance would be a reality across the entire developed world very soon, and there would be nothing else regular people can do to circumvent that.

In summary, the mindset is dangerous. I get the sentiment but it is bad to beat down a criminal to death just because “he/she could‘ve done much worse”, and that law system should always punish criminals based on actual damage instead of imaginary “what if”. Unless people unconsciously wish China’s “proactive criminal prevention system” in place in our developed world, we’d better careful what we are thinking.

I agree with you but the punishment should be equal to the attempt.

A terrorist plants a bomb that in the middle of New York that is powerful enough to kill any one in a half-mile radius, which equals about 20 thousand people. Police caught him, disabled the bomb, no one is dead. Should we let him go free?

We are not saying imaginary "What If"s here, the attempt has been executed.
 
Actually, they should keep this little idiot behind bars and also END TWITTER as well - a nasty app which causes issues.
 
17...he's going to get a job offer some where. Probably going to end up working for the government.
Ugh.
I was afraid there were going to be posts like this. =/
It always makes me a bit sad how incredibly out of touch with tech people on a tech forum usually are.
Y’all remind me of every grandma in the 90’s bragging about how their grandchild is the next Bill Gates, as evidenced by the fact that at age 12, they figured out how to change the time on the vcr.

If you read the article... you’d see that this was a particular type of “hacking” known as social engineering. That’s where you trick someone into giving you access to a system, so you don’t actually have to have much in the tech prowess arena, just MAD people manipulation skills!!!
Not saying that’s not a rare talent/ability... it certainly is. However, since it doesn’t follow that someone with that skill set would also be good at finding/repairing software exploits, or anything else I can think of, tech related- the “oooh, they’ll probably get hired up by some government & given a good job, based on their clever scam!”, comes off as extremely uninformed/ignorant to me.
I mean... I guess the government could hire him to come in at the end of a seminar on why not to give away your passwords over the phone to strangers and say “yep, that’s true guys.... or someone like me can use that info nefariously”. Other than that, I struggle to see why the government would want to hire them. Are they on a hiring spree of grifters to pull off a government sponsored Oceans 11 or something, that I’m unaware of??
 
  • Like
Reactions: 826317 and BeeGood
Put the 17 year old in jail for a while, then Frank Abignale him and make him work for the Government to finish out his sentence.
 
Ugh.
I was afraid there were going to be posts like this. =/
It always makes me a bit sad how incredibly out of touch with tech people on a tech forum usually are.
Y’all remind me of every grandma in the 90’s bragging about how their grandchild is the next Bill Gates, as evidenced by the fact that at age 12, they figured out how to change the time on the vcr.

If you read the article... you’d see that this was a particular type of “hacking” known as social engineering. That’s where you trick someone into giving you access to a system, so you don’t actually have to have much in the tech prowess arena, just MAD people manipulation skills!!!
Not saying that’s not a rare talent/ability... it certainly is. However, since it doesn’t follow that someone with that skill set would also be good at finding/repairing software exploits, or anything else I can think of, tech related- the “oooh, they’ll probably get hired up by some government & given a good job, based on their clever scam!”, comes off as extremely uninformed/ignorant to me.
I mean... I guess the government could hire him to come in at the end of a seminar on why not to give away your passwords over the phone to strangers and say “yep, that’s true guys.... or someone like me can use that info nefariously”. Other than that, I struggle to see why the government would want to hire them. Are they on a hiring spree of grifters to pull off a government sponsored Oceans 11 or something, that I’m unaware of??
 
Sorry, ignoring this as a part of the process just shows how little one understands it.

I think that guys point is that this wasn’t some incredibly sophisticated technological feat. He duped some Twitter employees into giving him VPN access to internal systems as if he was a remote employee.

This wasn’t some genius decryption job. It was a con. A well planned and executed con, but a con nonetheless.

Which, (and I’m not necessarily pointing at you) makes the hero-worship of this kid incredibly bizarre. He’s not some cyber wiz kid that should be hired by Apple or the Feds. He’s a crook, along the lines of the “Nigerian prince” that Is always asking people for bank information via email. No difference.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.