Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well thunderbolt wasn't developed for external storage. That was never the point it is external PCI Express if anything to piggy back loads of protocols.
Keep in mind Intel is responsible for both Thunderbolt and USB 3.0. The latter is meant for the majority of external storage. It is just expensive to build an PCIe SATA bridge along with the expensive Thunderbolt chip. Plus expensive active cables. That isn't worth it unless you intend to attach multiple devices.

Thunderbolt is meant for Displays, expensive Audio equipment, external processing or big fast raid arrays. It is not meant for digital cameras, external harddrives, flash drives, mice, keyboards and all the other small stuff.
If anything you can attach a dock via thunderbolt which turn offers a couple of USB ports, Audio ports, all the standard stuff basically.

Thunderbolt is actually faster than just 10Gb/s because it has not just one channel but two. It is also really low latency which is again useless for external storage but important for other stuff. USB is poor in that regard but it is cheap and pushes enough data for just about any of the small stuff.
 
Well thunderbolt wasn't developed for external storage. That was never the point it is external PCI Express if anything to piggy back loads of protocols.
Keep in mind Intel is responsible for both Thunderbolt and USB 3.0. The latter is meant for the majority of external storage. It is just expensive to build an PCIe SATA bridge along with the expensive Thunderbolt chip. Plus expensive active cables. That isn't worth it unless you intend to attach multiple devices.

Thunderbolt is meant for Displays, expensive Audio equipment, external processing or big fast raid arrays. It is not meant for digital cameras, external harddrives, flash drives, mice, keyboards and all the other small stuff.
If anything you can attach a dock via thunderbolt which turn offers a couple of USB ports, Audio ports, all the standard stuff basically.

Thunderbolt is actually faster than just 10Gb/s because it has not just one channel but two. It is also really low latency which is again useless for external storage but important for other stuff. USB is poor in that regard but it is cheap and pushes enough data for just about any of the small stuff.

Thunderbolt is faster than USB3.0 on external drives, though
 
Thunderbolt is faster than USB3.0 on external drives, though
Drives being the key word. If you don't have some ridiculous RAID array, USB 3.0 is still more than sufficient.
With one disk even if it is an SSD Thunderbolt isn't worth it.
TB is expensive as inflexible hugely expensive cables and is not getting anywhere near as cheap as USB for a long long time. It isn't expensive because it is new, it is because it is very different in how it works. It is not like a bit of time and it will come down in price to USB levels.
 
Drives being the key word. If you don't have some ridiculous RAID array, USB 3.0 is still more than sufficient.
With one disk even if it is an SSD Thunderbolt isn't worth it.
TB is expensive as inflexible hugely expensive cables and is not getting anywhere near as cheap as USB for a long long time. It isn't expensive because it is new, it is because it is very different in how it works. It is not like a bit of time and it will come down in price to USB levels.

Thunderbolt has lower latency and unlike USB3.0 it won't eject your drive if you fully load your CPU at the same time as you put lots of data through connected SSD (i.e. load USB bus). Thunderbolt also provides sufficient power supply to single 512GB+ SSDs under any conditions.
 
Thunderbolt drive speed

Depend on the drive you are looking at. Some slow, other fast

Over 1300MB+/s is possible

With T12-S6.TB2

12-S6.TB2.jpg

It's massive and fast. 1200MB+/s, our clients use for 4K editing

Speed+Space=Price
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.