I am in the market for an external thunderbolt drive, at least 1TB. Ideally it will be used a back up storage but I am hoping to be able to do some video editing off the drive itself. Hoping to spend <200$. Any suggestions?
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Thunderbolt external memory drive
- Thread starter Dirty Jacket
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
200$ is cutting it pretty tight for any thunderbolt drive but here's one to consider... http://www.amazon.com/LaCie-Rugged-...=1455728821&sr=1-3&keywords=lacie+thunderbolt
*edit* You'd probably get similar performance at less than half the price with USB 3...
*edit* You'd probably get similar performance at less than half the price with USB 3...
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
I use a delock thunderbolt enclosure and have it paired with a 1tb ssd drive. Just the drive caddy + thunderbolt cable will be over $100 however, not including the ssd.
If your iMac has USB 3, I think that would be a better way to go. Get a USB enclosure with uasp, if you use a USB hub to connect the drive both the drive caddy and the hub must support UASP (many don't, as they have to pay a licensing fee to use it.)
Enclosure and add your own drive? G-Tech TB Enclosure - $99
Fish is right though, TB for backups exclusively is (as Spock would say) 'Highly Illogical' unless you don't have USB3 then, did you see the link I posted above?
Fish is right though, TB for backups exclusively is (as Spock would say) 'Highly Illogical' unless you don't have USB3 then, did you see the link I posted above?
Even for backups, USB 2.0 is more than sufficient. If USB 3.0 is available, I don't see a reason to pay extra for TB.
The only problem with that enclosure is it's designed for a specific drive module to fit inside it. According to the single review, you need to wedge rolled up gaffer tape to keep a regular internal hard drive in position...
[doublepost=1455832001][/doublepost]
USB 2.0 is pathetic for any kind of file transfers. Even if a user was using Time Machine, restoring would be faster (with say migration assistant) with a USB 3 drive. If a user is using something like Carbon Copy Cloner, then USB2 is just a joke.
I don't know that I would characterize it as "pathetic," but if you're restoring from a backup more than once you probably have bigger problems than whether your backup drive is USB 2.0 or 3.0. Like I said, for backing up the slower speed is fine. If you have to restore, do a restore. If you're doing it often enough that becomes a burden, then the interface of your drive is not the main issue.
http://www.amazon.com/Cable-Matters...TF8&qid=1455858838&sr=8-3&keywords=ssd+reader
Something like that?
Something like that?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
OP wrote above:
"http://www.amazon.com/Cable-Matters...TF8&qid=1455858838&sr=8-3&keywords=ssd+reader
Something like that?"
CAUTION:
If you're buying ANY kind of USB3 external device -- whether it's an enclosure, a dock, or a "dongle adapter" -- BE SURE that it is SPECIFICALLY STATED to support "UASP".
UASP = "USB Attached SCSI Protocol", and you need this to obtain all the speed that USB3 is capable of delivering.
If it doesn't specifically state that it has UASP support, you must assume that it DOES NOT have it.
"http://www.amazon.com/Cable-Matters...TF8&qid=1455858838&sr=8-3&keywords=ssd+reader
Something like that?"
CAUTION:
If you're buying ANY kind of USB3 external device -- whether it's an enclosure, a dock, or a "dongle adapter" -- BE SURE that it is SPECIFICALLY STATED to support "UASP".
UASP = "USB Attached SCSI Protocol", and you need this to obtain all the speed that USB3 is capable of delivering.
If it doesn't specifically state that it has UASP support, you must assume that it DOES NOT have it.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Just get Thunderbolt. UASP brings the cost right up anyway, and you get better power capacity to boot.
USB 3 is fine for video editing even on a 2.5" HDD if you are using proxy files, a la Final Cut Pro X. Otherwise Thunderbolt is at least around twice as fast as non-UASP 3.0.
USB 3 is fine for video editing even on a 2.5" HDD if you are using proxy files, a la Final Cut Pro X. Otherwise Thunderbolt is at least around twice as fast as non-UASP 3.0.