Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Sun Baked said:
If the "psycho-sexual evaluation" means he'd be placed on the Florida Sexual Predator list -- I can see why he'd not likely do it.

Doesn't Florida have the twist where people "accused" of the crimes are placed on the sexual predator list (even if the the case has no merit) for a couple/few years?

And people thought the McCarthy Witchhunts were extreme.
 
Sun Baked said:
If the "psycho-sexual evaluation" means he'd be placed on the Florida Sexual Predator list -- I can see why he'd not likely do it.

Doesn't Florida have the twist where people "accused" of the crimes are placed on the sexual predator list (even if the the case has no merit) for a couple/few years?

If he is convicted he will also be place on a sexual predator list. Could even end up higher on the dangerousness list. He should think twice about a 15 year prison sentence. Don't imagine that he quite has the toughness for that kind of life. :(
 
If he is found guilty, he will spend all his time in a multi-acre facility with its own security force, working for low wages, wearing stripes, and eating lousy food.

Of course, if he is found innocent and returns to his job, he will spend all his time in a multi-acre facility with its own security force, working for low wages, wearing stripes, and eating lousy food.
 
i'm just curious, wouldn't the person TAKING THE PICTURE have noticed if Tigger was really fondling them, or just giving them a hug? I assume the person snapping the photo was the mother's husband/boyfriend, it would be pretty obvious whether or not "Tigger" was trying to get a squeeze in. They should have just poured coffee on their laps, quicker and higher pay, then again it would hurt.
 
It's good to know that the justice system functioned as expected. I have faith in our jury system. They are the judge of the facts.
 
It was probably a simple "she said, it said" case. :) Without more proof, the presumption of innocence would explain the verdict, despite the woman's claim.

Did you notice that the article says that defense attorney Jeffrey Kaufman also moonlights as Tigger? A jury of your peers is typical, but having an attorney with the same unusual job is really unusual!
 
Doctor Q said:
It was probably a simple "she said, it said" case. :) Without more proof, the presumption of innocence would explain the verdict, despite the woman's claim.

Did you notice that the article says that defense attorney Jeffrey Kaufman also moonlights as Tigger? A jury of your peers is typical, but having an attorney with the same unusual job is really unusual!

Interesting also the jurors said that the verdict was due more to that it couldn't be proven who was in the suit. Either way, glad that the guy didn't take the plea bargin.
 
wdlove said:
More bad news is certainly not what Disney needs. Those pictures always make the suspect look worse that reality. At trial they don't look like the same individual. Hopefully the truth of this matter will be sorted out.

Dyslexia is more a problem with your ability to read than your memory. He may have very well inadvertently touched her breast. If she sat on his lap for the picture, he may have put her arm around her. I would think that actual criminal fondling would be if he intentionally fondled her. Actual intent and physical action.

memory loss from dyslexia is pure bull**** i'm dyselxic and i have the best memory of anyone i know i remember stuff i did when i was 1 and a half.

dyselxia affects spelling, reading and writeing and the general recgnition or recitement of non-patternated language (or music for that matter)

it affects people in different ways like i can read very very well (at an adult level science i was 10) but my spelling and hadwriting are awfull i used to spell letteres wrong and write a b insteasd of d and vice versa.
 
I certainly wish that I had your memory Hector. All that I have of my life at about 3 - 4 years old are 2 vague images.

My wife has a form of dyslexia also. She just had to learn to adjust. She grew up before they knew anything about the condition.
 
both my parents are dyslexic and they overcame it by themselves, i still cant read my dads handwriting but thats probably because it's all squigley :rolleyes: but most people who are dyslexic end to make up for it in some other way like my dad is really good at math and phisics and my mum was an artist (i am good at art phisics and maths :D), it tends to be that dyslexic people make up for it in other departments.
 
Hector said:
both my parents are dyslexic and they overcame it by themselves, i still cant read my dads handwriting but thats probably because it's all squigley :rolleyes: but most people who are dyslexic end to make up for it in some other way like my dad is really good at math and physics and my mum was an artist (i am good at art physics and maths :D), it tends to be that dyslexic people make up for it in other departments.

I agree, overcoming just makes them stronger. My wife has done very well also. She is artistic and is good with math. ;)
 
Chartrand was re-instated as a Disney employee today. Is that a good thing or a bad thing? I could tell you but I think you've heard enough of that. :D
 
It's reasonable to be concerned that he might have gotten off only because he couldn't be proven guilty, whether or not he was innocent, but the law is the law, and for good reasons.

Maybe people will want to pose with him now because of his notoriety!
 
Doctor Q said:
It's reasonable to be concerned that he might have gotten off only because he couldn't be proven guilty, whether or not he was innocent, but the law is the law, and for good reasons.

Maybe people will want to pose with him now because of his notoriety!

Will Chartrand actually be in the "Tigger" suit again? The customers won't know for sure if it's him or not. Notoriety can be a good and a bad thing.
 
wdlove said:
Will Chartrand actually be in the "Tigger" suit again? The customers won't know for sure if it's him or not. Notoriety can be a good and a bad thing.

The guys life is a mess.... doesnt really matter now wether he did it or not...
He still got punished
 
wdlove said:
Will Chartrand actually be in the "Tigger" suit again? The customers won't know for sure if it's him or not. Notoriety can be a good and a bad thing.

He will not be a character of any kind, from what I heard.
 
bousozoku said:
Chartrand was re-instated as a Disney employee today. Is that a good thing or a bad thing? I could tell you but I think you've heard enough of that. :D

Having been in a "heavy" costume, I will say that it is hard to move in them.

The other thing is that charges took almost 2 months. No mention that Disney was contacted on the day of the event.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.