Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
>install spyware that spies on family members location information

>get upset when said location information is sold to the highest bidder

People who use this garbage willingly deserve this and more.
No, it’s not spying if it’s not done secretly. It’s called sharing when known.

Find My is the same exact type of service as Life360. Nobody goes into it with the expectation that their information will be sold. Nobody deserves anything like that.

Even Apple was caught listening in on private Siri conversations. Who the heck knows what else they’re doing?
 
>install spyware that spies on family members location information

>get upset when said location information is sold to the highest bidder

People who use this garbage willingly deserve this and more.
You can't expect everyone to be savvy enough to understand how the economics of these services work nor how it treats your data. From the consumer's perspective this and the people finding features in FindMy are equivalent, both being "free" apps that can be installed on their iPhones. How can you blame them if they happened to prefer the features of this app and didn't know about how their data is used? Companies like Life360 don't exactly say in big red letters "we will track you and sell your data."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Itinj24
Yet that is exactly what is happening with people tracking cars to steal with Airtags.


Wash/rinse/repeat with Tile/Life360, and with even more exact data from Life360/Tile.

BL.
Again if someone wants to break into my car then they don't need to track where it is to do so. Second that is what I have insurance for. I don't live my life scared.
 
It's not necessarily a matter of having anything to hide or caring if someone tracks you. The issue is that many users think of a service like Life360 as "free", when in fact users are giving something of value (habits, likes, dislikes, whereabouts, even the company you keep) to a corporation for free. The correct way to evaluate the value proposition is: Am I giving something of far greater value than I am getting? In reality, your tracking data could be worth hundreds or thousands of dollars when aggregated and sold by the corporation. In essence, you are giving away thousands of dollars' worth of personal data for what? An app to help track your family? (honestly, idk what Life360 does, anyway). It's the same with Facebook or any other data collector. Most people don't value their own data nearly as much as it is actually worth. Hence data collectors make billions off the masses who say "I'm not that important, I don't care who tracks me."
This changes nothing for me. It isn't a zero sum game. If I was going to monetize my data then I would care. I am not and would not so I simply don't care. I worry about furthering my career and financial situation far more than worrying about things like this.
 
No, you do have another choice, stop using free services and services not provided by Apple. Not that Apple is perfect....far from it, but it is clearly the most scrutinized and most damageable brand out there should they break privacy rules.
I don't use these free services but often you don't get a choice if the services are not available otherwise. And even then companies will still harvest the data and either use it themselves or sell it in other ways.
 
Okay, so let’s use a different example: iTunes. I don’t need Apple hardware or anything to use it. Am I now the product? Who is Apple selling my data to?

Again, my point wasn’t “Apple is as bad as everyone else”, it’s that “if it’s free you’re the product” is a dumb generalisation.
With iTunes, you’re paying for the computer, and for the iPod, and for the iPhone, and for the purchased songs, videos, ringtones (and at one time movies too), and for the Apple Music subscription. Apple’s revenue is coming from your purchase of the above products or services.

Again, it is not a dumb generalization. You are just missing a broader theme by having a very narrow focus. You’re basically saying something along the lines of “if I go to a restaurant and I pay for my food but I can use the bathroom for free then I am the product… and I know I am not so this is a a dumb generalization”. You have to consider the full picture and understand the broader exchange of money to make the determination of whether or not you are the customer or the product (or both).
 
With iTunes, you’re paying for the computer, and for the iPod, and for the iPhone, and for the purchased songs, videos, ringtones (and at one time movies too), and for the Apple Music subscription. Apple’s revenue is coming from your purchase of the above products or services.
I used iTunes for years without a Mac or an iPod or an iPhone or ever buying a thing from the iTunes Store. Those were all options available to me, but there was absolutely no requirement to own Apple anything. Apple Music wasn't even a thing yet.

Again, it is not a dumb generalization. You are just missing a broader theme by having a very narrow focus. You’re basically saying something along the lines of “if I go to a restaurant and I pay for my food but I can use the bathroom for free then I am the product… and I know I am not so this is a a dumb generalization”. You have to consider the full picture and understand the broader exchange of money to make the determination of whether or not you are the customer or the product (or both).
I guess we just have different thresholds for how accurate a generalisation needs to be in order to be useful.
 
But it's apple! It's safe, privacy before Jesus himself company! What could possibly go wrong placing all of our trust into one company?
 
Folks agreed to this in the terms of service. Now they're shocked when it happens?
Yes, it's almost like people are unhappy with a system that allows companies to bury details like "we're going to sell your precise location data to anyone that wants it" with legalese in the TOS.

Here's the Tile TOS. Raise your hand if you think the average user has the time, patience, and legal knowledge to actually understand everything they're agreeing to just to be able to activate a $25 device that helps them find their misplaced keys:


Call them 'shocked' or whatever you want, but this is the public pushing back on these kinds of policies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EedyBeedyBeeps
I am strictly referring to the Live tracking of people in the Find My app. The feature that was just introduced in iOS15. It’s terrible. Rarely, if ever, works.
I've had a completely different experience than you--the Find My live tracking feature that was added in iOS 15 has worked flawlessly for my family on dozens of iOS and macOS devices from the day it was introduced. I've actually been impressed with how accurate it is when viewing a user traveling through, say, a busy highway interchange where it would be easy for the service to get confused.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Itinj24
FYI, here's the response you get from Tile when requesting your account to be deleted:

Tile said:
Thank you for reaching out to us. I understand you would like to delete your Tile account. Please note that this is a permanent process and cannot be undone.

If you would like to continue with the account deletion request, I want to let you know that any Tiles associated with your account will also be deleted and will be unusable.

To continue with the account deletion, please reply with the following:
  1. Confirm the account deletion request
  2. Your current state and country
  3. A screenshot of the Tile app home view OR at least two of the following pieces of information so we may proceed:
  • The year that you registered for your Tile account
  • The number of Tiles associated with your Tile account
  • The names and activation dates of the Tiles you have associated with your Tile account

Additionally, to help Tile improve, can you please tell us why you want to delete your account?

Looking forward to hearing from you.[/quote[]
 
  • Like
Reactions: EedyBeedyBeeps
I didn’t forget that, but an iPod wasn’t a requirement to use iTunes. Most of my friends in highschool used iTunes but didn’t own an iPod. It was free, and not one of them was the product.
Again, there’s a distinction. iTunes was/is free so it can entice you to buy music. That’s the product.
 
Again, there’s a distinction. iTunes was/is free so it can entice you to buy music. That’s the product.

When iTunes (and the store) was introduced for Windows, it was meant to give greater exposure for Apple products as well as enable and encourage many more people to buy from the store as conveniently as possible. Increasing the number of people using/enjoying Apple products increased the number of people buying from Apple, whether it was something from the iTunes store or an Apple device.

It was similar to how a lot of "free" apps work these days. In this case, iTunes was the free app and optional in-app purchases came from the iTunes store.

Apple clearly felt that the greater usage resulting from offering iTunes for free would lead to more Apple purchases and profits elsewhere (iTunes store, Apple store, etc.) versus charging for iTunes. The publicity from having a desirable, popular, arguably market leading product was a benefit too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: polaris20
When iTunes (and the store) was introduced for Windows, it was meant to give greater exposure for Apple products as well as enable and encourage many more people to buy from the store as conveniently as possible. Increasing the number of people using/enjoying Apple products increased the number of people buying from Apple, whether it was something from the iTunes store or an Apple device.

It was similar to how a lot of "free" apps work these days. In this case, iTunes was the free app and optional in-app purchases came from the iTunes store.

Apple clearly felt that the greater usage resulting from offering iTunes for free would lead to more Apple purchases and profits elsewhere (iTunes store, Apple store, etc.) versus charging for iTunes. The publicity from having a desirable, popular, arguably market leading product was a benefit too.
Right; it was a “gateway drug” to Apple products, both music purchases and their hardware. It wasn’t (as far as I know) selling your information, or tracking your location to be sold.
 
At this point, if you're using a service that has no payment model attached to it ... it's on you.
I pay for a Life360 account to get some of the premium features, and I still had to opt out of tracking. (I didn't know about this tracking business).
 
My wife has 4 Tiles. We paid for them. We pay an annual fee for Tile Premium for replacement batteries. It is due up in January. I'll be replacing her Tiles with Airtags.
 
  • Like
Reactions: polaris20
A useful reminder that the internet is 99% scams and thieves, and that percentage is rounded down pretty aggressively
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.