There is always a debate between nuance and sound bites and unfortunately most of the time, sound bites win.
People usually only say that when they disagree with the political views of the company they wish to stay out of politics.Maybe it's opposite way? How about we separate politic and technology...
To answer your question, No.You have zero clue what Jobs and Cook do. Are you one of those people who post, 'This would have never happened when Jobs was running Apple"?
Apparently, I'm not "they."People usually only say that when they disagree with the political views of the company they wish to stay out of politics.
Sorry Tim, I don't think there's any misunderstanding with Paris and San Bernardino. There's nothing wrong with turning away people that can't be properly vetted. That doesn't mean banning anyone of a certain religion but pausing immigration from countries where groups like ISIS and Al Qaeda have a foothold...absolutely.
Sorry, but I have to laugh. Do you seriously expect that terrorists would not pass any vetting and come in as legitimate?
While I have no idea of their countries citizen registration procedures I am absolutely sure terrorists can get REAL papers anytime they wish. (Passport with false name etc.) They have enough money and resources to do so.
Proven in San Bernadino.
By the time we vet the really innocent "carefully" there is a good chance they will not make it.
Nobody has a solution to this problem. What we are seeing now is the result of years and years of failed international politics.
America would not exist if people had been turned away for whatever reason.
The point is that enough innocent Muslims get killed they will eventually stand up for themselves.
Perhaps Apple decided to design something functional even though it doesn't look great. Nearly every review I've seen is mostly positive (outside of looks). Like this one:Spot on ! Tim does seem to have a very simple view of the world. He really just needs do focus on running Apple..... And finding the Person responsible for the design of the new battery case!
Sorry about the mistake but thanks for the catch - i have fixed the original post.This ^^ (I assume you meant Tim as the first word in the 2nd paragraph)
Steve ran a company (brilliantly). That was it.
Tim USES the company as his own personal political soap box.
I can't wait till he is no longer CEO.
P.S. before @rdowns responds with a 'how do you know?' nonsense question. my reply is: perception is reality in this case.
When Apple stops hiding hundreds of billions of dollars overseas to avoid U.S. taxes, then he can lecture us about Syrian immigrants. Until then, shut-up Tim, and keep APPL (115.72, 2.13%) on the upswing.
So if you're pro-theft, only then you become qualified to have an opinion on a bad situation most people here aren't within a million miles of being able to relate to? How does this work?
What's your resume look like in comparison to Cook's where you can yap but he needs to shut up?
Again, not asking that they be turned away. Just that they be held in refugee camps until vetted properly. If one innocent American is killed by a terrorist who is let in via the refugee program that is too many.
Ain't that the truth!Problem is that despite being in the land of the FREE, free speech etc.
too many times it is impossible to say the truth or have a different viewpoint/opinion.
Whenever somebody dares, they are being pummeled into "politically correct" until they comply......
Steve Jobs barely got involved in anything remotely politics. Although he did go to the white house and tell Obama that manufacturing jobs were not coming back to the US because of labor laws, education and salaries.
Tim on the other hand spends almost as much time on political issues (especially gay rights) as he does running Apple. I like Tim, but please spend more time doing your job as CEO.
Edit: started second paragraph with steve when I meant tim. fixed now.
How does bringing these people into the United States solve that problem? it's not like these people come here and assimilate into our society. They're certainly not doing that in Europe. No what happens is bad ones get in too and innocent people die.
If Tim Cook cares so much about all this stuff perhaps he should go back to Alabama and run for congress or the senate and let someone else run Apple.
So because our vetting sucks that means let anyone in the country? BS. How many refugees is Tim Cook planning to take in?
Huh? Apple as a company has always supported left-wing ideology.The total collapse of the creative/professional/productive Apple product line, the move towards fashion teenage items, and the rush of the CEO into politics and far-left ideology, all of them seem to be closely tied and connected. First we lose the Mac. Now we lose the brand unless we adhere to its politics ideology. Not my brand anymore.
America would not exist if people had been turned away for whatever reason.
Why only pay what is legally required?