Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
<snip>
A lot of people were criticizing him a year or two ago when there was a photo of him and Jony Ive looking at a new Apple product and it appeared that Jony Ive was explaining the product to him.
Oh yes, the famous “Tim Apple is so out of touch with product development, here’s Jony Ive showing him the 2019 Mac Pro for the first time” photo 😂

The only problem with that hot take was that Cook had just finished introducing the machine on-stage not an hour before lol.

But yeah, agreed: it’s entirely appropriate for Cook to focus on the customer. That’s how we get new products Apple customers love, and course corrections like the resurrection of the Mac mini, the re-architected Mac Pro—that has everything Pros asked for and more—and the larger 16” MBP with the newly-engineered keyboard that users are raving about.

Cook doesn’t have to be the operations expert anymore. He’s got an extremely competent COO in Jeff Williams and no doubt a very effective team that reports to him, many of whom trained at the hands of the master.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
well I didn’t say that and I don’t agree with it. I think the innovation out of Steve Jobs’ Apple is overrated. And design language is subjective. I was never a fan of Aqua or any of the skeuomorphism Jobs liked.

You didn't say that, I did. Attention to detail and coherence in design language is as objective as it can be.

Skeuomorphic or not, Jobs or Forstall were absolute pedants, inspecting UI's under a loupe to make sure they're pixel perfect and consistent. Now you see assets flying all over the place (icons not adhering to grid, text exceeding captions, random padding etc).

Equally, product design wise, attention to detail is gone (eg look at the random screen bezels of the 2019 MacBook Pro), cadence is never ending (the iMac and Mac mini look the same as it did 10 years ago, hell, they'd even re-release the iPhone 8 as SE2 than design something new), and attributes across product lines are so inconsistent they almost look like the products of different companies – in some cases they really are the products of different companies, like the 5K LG eyesore of a screen.

It was never about "good enough" under Steve. When the Retina display of iPhone 4 was first launched, it was about 'fine print level of typography', and not "yea but if you can't see it does it even matter" compromise of the iPhone XR screen 9 years later. Too bad that the iPhone 4(S), for all its stellar leaps in technology and design aesthetics, is squarely associated with the "you're holding it wrong" ridiculousness. And all the products were conducive in creating a uniform aesthetic and value proposition.

So no, it's not about skeuomorphism or Aqua. The problem with Apple of 2019 is that they believe they are still producing the same quality of OS/hardware as when Steve would chew off the heads of the dev team for getting a font wrong.
[automerge]1576000154[/automerge]
Cook doesn’t have to be the operations expert anymore. He’s got an extremely competent COO in Jeff Williams and no doubt a very effective team that reports to him, many of whom trained at the hands of the master.

And what about the products? Honestly, who in there cares about the products?!
[automerge]1576000532[/automerge]
I think they are doing a much better job lately, they might have been preoccupied with that spaceship, now it's finished and we see...New MacBook Pro 16", iMac Pro, Mac Mini, new MacBook Air, Mac Pro, AirPods and more to come.
There's only one gripe here, prices went up considerably last 5 years.

These are all hygiene/maintenance fixes or breakfix updates to address negative publicity. The iMac Pro is left on the vine without any updates and the Mac mini uses the same shell since 2009. Even the Watch 5 does not have enough updates to even be called a Watch 4S. Other than meandering mea culpas they haven't released anything fundamentally new, redesigned and rethought in several years (other than the AirPods/Pro perhaps, but that's only an accessory)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Breezygirl
What innovation Tim Cook is referring too?

The Pathetic Macbooks Pro 2016-19 and the worse keyboard ever
Or a 10 year old design iMac?
or a 10k Mac Pro that you cannot upgrade the internal SSD?
 
Cool story. Looks like it was a good trip.
That said... about healthcare...

Really hope Tim visited the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare during his visit to the city...

It's been over a year since ECG launched with the Apple Watch Series 4, we're on AppleWatch Series 5, and there's STILL no ECG support in Japan... :(

this. this is exactly what i have been thinking and have looked (in vain) for any schedule hints or unexplained gaps in his reported public schedule).

it is not reported that he met with any government healthcare officials. :(

also, worthy of mention, it also has not been reported that he met with anybody that could be related to apple card launch in japan either. :(
[automerge]1576036057[/automerge]
I was wondering about that myself. ;)

i think the guy holding his hands like that is telling tim that iPhones of late all seem "this big" and laughing about it - trying to get him to realize that there are other market segments than just heavier bigger phones every year.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Malus120
I’m guessing:
- the iPhone lineup
- the entirety of the wearables segment
- the innovative shows that are up for awards

The only thing Apple has been innovating has been the wearables.
As I said, The entire computer line up is outdated and overpriced.

The rest is non-sense. How can you innovate with a show?? Producing content is NOT innovative.
 
The only thing Apple has been innovating has been the wearables.
And the iPhone as well.
As I said, The entire computer line up is outdated and overpriced.
Okay, but my kids love their MacBooks.
The rest is non-sense. How can you innovate with a show?? Producing content is NOT innovative.
Producing content can and is be innovative:
-all in the family
- the matrix
Are but two examples. Of course one could have a sufficiently narrow view of innovation...
 
Say what you want about Tim Cook but he is good at this kind of stuff. And it’s something Steve Jobs never did. I wish the Apple board would promote Jeff Williams to run the company and let Tim Cook focus on this kind of stuff. He’s much better at this than product development.

Jeff is probably THE most intelligent person working at Apple today, according to Bloomberg, yet his presentations are just horrible 'drone' like! He really needs to push out of his 'comfort zone' and nervousness in presentations. Very humble guy ... I'm the same but to lead a company you really should be able to shine your personality (within reason) just a little bit more if you're going to be presenting products.

Apple Watch ... an AMAZING product and very happy to own one.
 

Job's insight about this context.

I feel that your video is both outdated and irrelevant and shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how Apple operates these days.

https://www.aboveavalon.com/notes/2019/12/11/the-apple-tax-died-years-ago

I see your Steve Jobs video and raise you an AboveAvalon article explaining this phenomenon, aptly titled “The Apple tax died long ago”.

When it comes to how Apple prices various accessories like dongles, Watch bands, and iPad keyboards, the company isn’t relying on an Apple Tax. Instead, accessories by their very nature have high gross margins given that the items are sold to customers looking to personalize their experience. A similar philosophy applies to Mac memory and storage upgrades. While those upgrades are indeed profitable for Apple, the fact that Apple charges the prices they do is not a sign of Apple users being held hostage and forced to pay an Apple Tax. Instead, positioning certain items as accessories or upgrades plays a role in Apple keeping entry-level product pricing low for the mass market.

It’s easy to look at Apple pricing and take a cynical view that management is trying to squeeze as much profit as possible from its users. However, Apple’s incentive isn’t to milk users for all they can but rather to expand the Apple user base and provide users great experiences. Apple’s ability to grab monopoly-like share of industry profits isn’t a result of there being an Apple Tax but rather a byproduct of Apple following a design-led product strategy that ultimately marginalizes industries.

I will argue that the evidence points to Apple learning a few things from near fatal decisions made with the Mac during the mid-1990s. Apple's "revenue and gross profit optimization" strategy ends up supporting new user growth over milking profits from existing users.

Bonus reading - Apple uses good design to marginalise industries.

https://www.aboveavalon.com/notes/2015/10/13/apple-uses-good-design-to-marginalize-industries
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
I feel that your video is both outdated and irrelevant and shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how Apple operates these days.

https://www.aboveavalon.com/notes/2019/12/11/the-apple-tax-died-years-ago

I see your Steve Jobs video and raise you an AboveAvalon article explaining this phenomenon, aptly titled “The Apple tax died long ago”.





I will argue that the evidence points to Apple learning a few things from near fatal decisions made with the Mac during the mid-1990s. Apple's "revenue and gross profit optimization" strategy ends up supporting new user growth over milking profits from existing users.

Bonus reading - Apple uses good design to marginalise industries.

https://www.aboveavalon.com/notes/2015/10/13/apple-uses-good-design-to-marginalize-industries
I'm am very confused...

I don't see any connection between the video and your comment.
 
The only thing Apple has been innovating has been the wearables.
As I said, The entire computer line up is outdated and overpriced.

The rest is non-sense. How can you innovate with a show?? Producing content is NOT innovative.
"Only thing?" Even IF Apple was "only" innovating wearables, it would be a tremendous value add.

Apple innovates in iPhones, silicon, services like Apple Pay, and through software features.

Again, choosing not to recognize the innovation doesn't mean it's not there.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.