Become a MacRumors Supporter for $25/year with no ads, private forums, and more!

meistervu

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jul 24, 2008
1,027
27
I have a MBPr, and I am looking to replace my old router. At first was going to get an Asus AC router, but then for it occurs to me that for about $110 more I can get a 2013 Time Capsule to back up my stuffs. It doesn't sound like a bad deal if I look at it that way.

Then I look at the specs: 2TB, USB2, unknown throughput (older ones get 20-30MB/s). Not very impressive on the surface. In my past life I have built hundreds of machines, almost always with bleeding edge components.

But when I really think about it, this TC make sense and the "low" specs don't matter much. I am not looking for a NAS as it would be too slow for my photo library anyway, so USB3 on the TC wouldn't do me much good other than extending the backup capacity. I could probably put a 4TB drive in there when I need to in the future.

So I am leaning toward getting a 2TB TC and a 3TB Buffalo Drive Station DDR for my Lightroom photo library. Any thought?
 

sick z33

macrumors 6502
Sep 20, 2008
295
4
The Time Capsule was not really designed for storage. Mainly backups which is OK with the low read/write speeds. I would look into a cheap NAS solution (Synology single bay with WD Red) or an external drive. Even if the TC had USB 3.0, it still would not perform as fast as the other solutions.
 
Comment

meistervu

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jul 24, 2008
1,027
27
Did you read my post? Your response didn't make any sense to me as I wasn't planning to use the TC as a storage, hence my comments about the the "low" specs making no difference.

The Time Capsule was not really designed for storage. Mainly backups which is OK with the low read/write speeds. I would look into a cheap NAS solution (Synology single bay with WD Red) or an external drive. Even if the TC had USB 3.0, it still would not perform as fast as the other solutions.
 
Comment

sick z33

macrumors 6502
Sep 20, 2008
295
4
Apologize for that, I missed that one part of your post.

TC with the Buffalo DDR would be great. We sell them at work like crazy :)
 
Comment

AppleFan360

macrumors 68020
Jan 26, 2008
2,200
690
So I am leaning toward getting a 2TB TC and a 3TB Buffalo Drive Station DDR for my Lightroom photo library. Any thought?
That solution would be fine. The good thing about the TC is that you set it up and forget about it. It just rolls in the background.

In the setup procedure on the TC, there is an option to do a transfer from other types of routers to the TC (settings probably). I didn't try it but you might want to check that out when you get your TC.
 
Comment

skorpien

macrumors 68020
Jan 14, 2008
2,339
0
You mentioned extending the capacity of the TC with an additional 4TB drive in the future. Attaching an external HDD to the Time Capsule won't increase its storage capacity. It shares it as an entirely separate drive on your network.

If you change the target drive of Time Machine to the external, your backup will need to be recreated from scratch.

However, if the new TC is anything like the old TC, it would be possible for you to open it up and replace the internal drive with a larger drive. You can copy the sparsebundle file from the old drive to the new drive and it should allow you to resume your backups on the larger drive.
 
Comment

meistervu

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jul 24, 2008
1,027
27
However, if the new TC is anything like the old TC, it would be possible for you to open it up and replace the internal drive with a larger drive. You can copy the sparsebundle file from the old drive to the new drive and it should allow you to resume your backups on the larger drive.

That is what I meant, replacing the internal 2TB drive with a 4TB drive in the future.
 
Comment

whsbuss

macrumors 68040
May 4, 2010
3,745
688
SE Penna.
Look into the WD MyBook Live NAS. Supports native time machine (afp) and PCs (smb). Been using a 2TB here for over a year and it works very well. Remote access (via internet) is a bit slow but I really don't use it much. They have various storage options 2TB, 3TB and 6TB raid.

And most important to me is the ability to do safe point backups. In my situation I have a 2TB USB drive connected to my R6300 802.11ac router and I have backups of the NAS automatically done every week.
 
Comment

haruhiko

macrumors 603
Sep 29, 2009
5,247
3,230
I have a MBPr, and I am looking to replace my old router. At first was going to get an Asus AC router, but then for it occurs to me that for about $110 more I can get a 2013 Time Capsule to back up my stuffs. It doesn't sound like a bad deal if I look at it that way.

Then I look at the specs: 2TB, USB2, unknown throughput (older ones get 20-30MB/s). Not very impressive on the surface. In my past life I have built hundreds of machines, almost always with bleeding edge components.

But when I really think about it, this TC make sense and the "low" specs don't matter much. I am not looking for a NAS as it would be too slow for my photo library anyway, so USB3 on the TC wouldn't do me much good other than extending the backup capacity. I could probably put a 4TB drive in there when I need to in the future.

So I am leaning toward getting a 2TB TC and a 3TB Buffalo Drive Station DDR for my Lightroom photo library. Any thought?

The Time Capsule has an internal harddisk that is connected to the motherboard through SATA, not USB.
 
Comment

meistervu

macrumors 65816
Original poster
Jul 24, 2008
1,027
27
The Time Capsule has an internal harddisk that is connected to the motherboard through SATA, not USB.

Yes, I am aware of that. I was referring to the USB2 port that one can connect an external hd to.
 
Comment

mpainesyd

macrumors 6502a
Nov 29, 2008
658
159
Sydney, Australia
Just installed a new TC. Connected the old one using ethernet cable (into wan socket of old TC). This seems very fast, if you are looking for better than usb2 performance.(maybe an ethernet external hd is the way to go)
 
Comment

pdutta2000

macrumors regular
Jun 4, 2008
157
0
Just installed a new TC. Connected the old one using ethernet cable (into wan socket of old TC). This seems very fast, if you are looking for better than usb2 performance.(maybe an ethernet external hd is the way to go)

Can you tell us how hot your new TC is getting? The old design never really shook the failure issues it had and I wasn't sure if that was a heat thing or a design problem. The new one has a fan so I'm assuming that apple put it there to ensure the drive doesn't fail due to heat.

I really want the new TC but I'm waiting a month or two to ensure the failure issues from the last gen don't re-surface.
 
Comment

VenusianSky

macrumors 65816
Aug 28, 2008
1,290
47
^ I picked up a new TC to replace my 1st gen 500GB. The 1st gen did get pretty warm, but I never had any issues. I bought it right when they came out and it still works perfect to this day. The new does not get as hot and the drive isn't as noisy.
 
Comment
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.