Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Cool list. At various times in my life I owned 26 items from the list. Ironically, never the iPhone.
Not 100% on a couple but I counted 28 (i counted the IBM thinkpad and 5150, but in reality they were work provided). If I counted how many of each I have owned, the number would be much higher. Starting with the 8 iphones I have purchased!
 
Sorry Time but Tv had a much greater impact than an iPhone

The problem is that TV is an industry. What specific gadget in the TV industry stands out as having a big impact? Some specific model of RCA or Magnavox? Nope. None (except the Trinitron listed.)

At least with telephones, one has the Western Union dial, and the Regency radio for transistors.
 
You talk about VR yet exclude the fact that pretty much all headsets from every company are pretty much as useless as the Apple Watch (which you believe is useless).

The killer app with VR right now is video games. I've heard only great things about it.

I know a few people with Apple Watch. Reactions range from "It's better than the competition" to "Useless". Beating the competition is a very low bar in the category, because everyone is useless. Apple's useless product is a bit more polished than the rest, but that doesn't make it useful.

Again, being first does not mean success. Apple has proven this several times and I doubt they care about being first in the electric car industry. Tesla hasn't turned a profit at this point but maybe the Model 3 will change that. How many all electric car companies are there with a mainstream presence? I bet you can only name one which leaves room for another.

If Tesla was content with only making the S and X at the current volumes, they'd be turning a profit just fine (that's why they have turned a profit in some quarters). They don't turn a profit every quarter yet because they're still heavily investing. Somehow they need to go from making 50K cars last year to 500K cars in 2 years. That's going to require a lot of money being invested in new facilities.

At some point, Tesla will begin plateauing and won't need to invest so heavily - they'll already have enough factories, they'll just need to maintain and update their factories. At that point, they should be consistently profitable.

Most of the stuff people complain about on this site is would not be deemed revolutionary or innovative if Apple actually listened. More ports, lower prices, new iPhone design, VR support, bigger battery, quicker updates, none of this would be deemed revolutionary by anyone who posts here.

Yeah, most of that stuff would be iterative, not revolutionary. VR support would be a revolution if Apple did it first. At this point, it's just catch up. Apple can only claim to be the first to do something right if nobody else has done something right yet. VR appears to have been done properly already.
 
Sorry Time but Tv had a much greater impact than an iPhone and still is, remove the TV from our lives, see what your life will be like!
Well, I only use a TV for playing Smash Bros and that's it.
 
Not 100% on a couple but I counted 28 (i counted the IBM thinkpad and 5150, but in reality they were work provided). If I counted how many of each I have owned, the number would be much higher. Starting with the 8 iphones I have purchased!
Mine could have technically included the iPhone since I have purchased them for my wife and daughter. Never for me though. If Tim follows through with the suggestion that it might one day have the ability to choose default apps... there could be a first.
 
Probably the Gold and Rose Gold is the 6s, The White and Black the 6S+?

Exactly what I was thinking. The scaling makes them look about 10 percent smaller, which lines up with the actual difference in size between the two. Also note the antenna bands look thinner, as do the camera and flash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 69Mustang
People said similar things in 2006. Apple milked the iPod's success for a very very long time, while developing new things in the background.

The problem is most people's short attention span when it comes to innovation. They think a company is only innovative if they release something life-changing once a year. Or even better, twice a year.

For innovation to happen, many things have to fall in place. The first iPhone required wireless technology, good batteries, high-performing low-power processors, capacitive multitouch and a great operating system to bring everything together. Some technologies had to mature, while others had just come into mainstream existence. Which new or newly matured technologies are there now to drive the next round of innovation?
i agree. i think the next round of life changing gadgets will happen when battery tech makes a giant leap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: s15119
Fire should be #1. The real "burning wood" kind, not The Amazon Product Currently Named For Fire.

Boxed matches should be #2. For producing fire (#1).

I suspect boxed matches, or any kind of easily carried ignition source, was ignored because no one uses them any more, and the idea of carrying a piece of flint and pyrite and a tinderbox is much too far in the past.

There's also all them new-fangled pocket lighters the young whippersnappers like so much. Oh, and defective iPhone batteries.
 
Just watched the iBook keynote for the memories. Steve was so proud of the iBook. Apple has put just the best of the best parts they could get. It had the best GFX, faster than anything you could get on the market in a portable at that time. The best display they could get. The best keyboard, the best connectivity. Man, I miss the Apple of Steve. Now they are milking the customers with outdated iThings. They should take a look at those keynotes every once in a while and remember what Apple stood for. Being the best.

Seeing that keynote made me sad. Missing Steve and missing Apple of then... :(
 
It makes me laugh when people think Apple isn't releasing revolutionary products fast enough. Name one other company with a similar track record. You can't. The stock market has proved people have utterly irrational expectations. I expect Apple to release a new category device every decade or so. That's my expectation
 
This list is specifically for gadgets and not inventions.
These lists always cause debate and they should be taken with a pinch of salt.

Yes iPhone is great but of all time?

What's a gadget??

I'd say book, reading glasses, glass even

If it's gadgets then Sinclsir ZX81 should be there
 
These ranking are more to do with the educational and age of the editors at Time currently. The iPhone is a great invention, but also borrowed lots of features / ideas

While I think of my journey , the Nokia 5510 was the most impact, the phone that I wanted most was the StarTAC, the iPhone evolved the phone to a new level. Though for me Nokia allowed me to own a mobile phone, they are bullet proof and the batteries lasted a week.

For others I guess the iPhone is thier amazing device
 
Last edited:
iphone-6s-colors-800x586.jpg

This image is incredibly sloppy. It is known that objects of equal size would appear different sizes if they are stacked in perspective. This image shows the back pink iPhone standing at a slightly larger height then the one in the very front. Running a ruler across the lines makes it obvious, but even more obvious are the antenna band differences where somehow the phones in the foreground appear slightly off from the others.
 
People said similar things in 2006. Apple milked the iPod's success for a very very long time, while developing new things in the background.

The problem is most people's short attention span when it comes to innovation. They think a company is only innovative if they release something life-changing once a year. Or even better, twice a year.

For innovation to happen, many things have to fall in place. The first iPhone required wireless technology, good batteries, high-performing low-power processors, capacitive multitouch and a great operating system to bring everything together. Some technologies had to mature, while others had just come into mainstream existence. Which new or newly matured technologies are there now to drive the next round of innovation?
This pretty much summarizes how I feel about the way things are going, and the ways people are reacting.
[doublepost=1462308620][/doublepost]
Google Glass? Seriously? No, seriously?
Agreed, and equally confused
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlueParadox
Google Glass is on that list? Really?

Because it was the first consumer-ish, semi-buyable face-mounted wearable? Or because of the potential--never really capitalized on--to be the first mainstream augmented-reality wearable?

Either way, calling it "influential" seems like a bit of a stretch given that its primary influence was demonstrating that if you wear a computer on your face people are going to insult you and kick you out of bars. Well, that, and proving "just because some hardcore technologist says it's cool doesn't mean anybody actually wants it", but I think we already knew that.
 
...VR appears to have been done properly already.
If its been done properly already, how come we all don't have VR headsets at home, or on the train, or out and about?
Mobile phones and tablets have been done properly now and we ALL have them.
I think we'll know when VR is done properly because we will ALL have at least one headset in every household. Until then, its anybody game!
 
However, saying that it is THE most influential gadget of all time seems a bit of a stretch.

Not really - ask the general public things they can't live without and just watch how often the smartphone gets listed on that list. I think we have to go back as far in time as the automobile's invention in the early 1900s to find a category that has changed lives so profoundly in the way smartphones have done. The iPhone defined what a smartphone should be like and how one interacts with it - Android copied it, Blackberry is dead, and turns out people didn't want a mechanical keyboard after all.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.