I just started using the activity app on my apple watch this monday (yeh im a fitbit guy) but always had a Apple Watch since series 0. The watch set my calorie goal to 650, ive been to the gym the whole week and always get 1000+ calories burn by moving, also get a average of 150 mins of exercise a day...
Might have to up that to 1200, then lower it on rest day.
For me, to close the move and exercise rings, 20min of dancing =100 calories. The funnier the moves, the more effective.Got my series 3 in Jan and want to complete a first full month of closing all rings in March.
I’m 5’8 30 and 182 lbs what should my move goal beDefault is 400 calories I think, but what should I set it at?
5’8Default is 400 calories I think, but what should I set it at?
You guys living in urban areas and working jobs where you're on your feet a lot are lucky in terms of getting exercise without having to try. I live in suburbia and have a desk job. I average just over 3000 steps per weekday and around 6000 steps per weekend day when I don't purposely go on a walk or run for exercise.
I have a desk job. I get around it with little stuff. Need to go to the bathroom? Don't go to the closest one, go to the one on the opposite end of the building. Need coffee/tea/water/etc, don't go to the closest area for that, go to the one that is the furthest away. Going to the bathroom? Do an extra lap on my way back. I find a little here and there does wonders. Most days I've hit my goals (650 calories, 10,000 steps and 5 miles) before ever going home.
Clearly that will depend on the amount of freedom you have at work. I'm salaried, not hourly, so I tend to have slightly more freedom with these things than those punching a clock.
I'm assuming that you're a woman, based on your avatar and that you mention a husband. If I've assumed incorrectly, please forgive me.I’ve been ignoring the Move ring for 3 months now. I honestly don’t remember how I’d ended up with a 900 calorie goal, but I know the current calculations are way off base. Take today: one hour of hardcore yoga, 40 minutes of boxing and 20 minutes of weight training with my coach that made me want to cry for my mommy, plus 20 minutes of VMX rope pull at the highest resistance level. This is a pretty typical day for me. What’s changed from 3 months ago is that I’ve sustained a running injury, so I don’t get in the 20-30K daily steps that I used to. I’m a writer and photographer, but the Watch doesn’t care that I do most of it standing up (sitting hurts courtesy of said injury). It doesn’t care that I drip sweat for 40 minutes in a boxing ring or that I burn 500+ calories on the vertical rope (you’d think the high heart rate and vigorous arm motion would be a clue, but evidently it’s not).
Today it gave me credit for 90 minutes of exercise. OK - I kept my heart rate over 155 for about that long all told. But I put in easily another hour at 130-140. Since my resting HR is below 50, how is that hour NOT counted toward my Move goal? It’s 8pm, I’ve been up and going since 6am, and my Move ring is at 40%. What?
I’m a 5’10” beanpole who scarfs down 2500+ calories a day just to stay put on windy days. I am definitely “moving” enough. By comparison, my husband has a mostly desk job, but because he logs the vaunted 10K+ steps a day (albeit at a leisurely pace) and reluctantly hits the elliptical during the evening news, all his rings close every day.
Yeah, I know I can lower the calorie goal. I’m just miffed that the watch is so unbelievably crappy at assessing the athletic value of any activity that doesn’t involve significant horizontal displacement. If it weren’t for uploaded music, texts (though not calls - their quality is atrocious), and the handy HR monitor for HIIT workouts, the damn thing would be sitting in a drawer.
Thank you for your suggestions and yes, I’m a woman.I'm assuming that you're a woman, based on your avatar and that you mention a husband. If I've assumed incorrectly, please forgive me.
The way calories are calculated on any of these devices are based on height, weight, and gender. The taller you are, the more easily calories are burned. The heavier you are, the more easily calories are burned. And lastly, men burn more calories than women for the "same" level of activity. I don't know why, but that's how the formulas work.
In regards to your AW not crediting you with a calorie burn level that you think you should be getting, I would suggest looking at a few things.
1. Make sure your height, weight, and gender is set correctly in your Health app on the iPhone. Some folks were having low calorie counts and it turned out that their weight setting somehow got changed to 50 lbs or so.
2. When you are working out (yoga, boxing, etc) are you selecting a workout on your AW? If not, the AW isn't recording a continuous HR, and the algorithms to calculate calories isn't based on active workouts.
3. If you have selected a Workout, are you using Other? I have found that Other seems to use an algorithm that mimics a light walk. If you're really getting your HR up with intense exercise, I would suggest using HIIT. HIIT seems to use a different algorithm that gives calorie burn more in line with intense exercise.
That's all I got.
900 active calories is a lot in my experience.... I am relatively skinny for my height as well. Just saying. Have you paid any attention to those weekly reminders you get on Monday morning? You could adjust the goal down based on that and what you think is reasonable (I never use the goal it suggests exactly). Even if the other things still bother you at least you'd be closing your rings!Thank you for your suggestions and yes, I’m a woman.
1. All my height/weight/age/etc info is correct because my native health app is integrated with Fitness Pal, which I use to track micro- and macro nutrients of what I eat to get enough protein, calcium etc., esp. when I’m training for races. I do expect a certain degree of inaccuracy in my AW’s calorie counting because it obviously doesn’t take into account the user’s BMI or just plain genetics when it comes to metabolic rates. It would be OK, if it weren’t so wildly off base. I look very skinny, but I’m packing almost 140 lbs because of lean muscle and dense bones. As far as my AW is concerned, I should be expected to have burned more than 360 calories in 14 hours yesterday (!), especially since it gave me credit for 230 cal. for yoga and general credit for 90 minutes of exercise. The math just doesn’t make sense.
2. I do try to remember to select the right workout. Yoga is a gimme, and running always was very accurate. The elliptical - not so much. I do sprint work on it now that I’m injured and I haul a...s on my toes while keeping my pelvis stable to keep from irritating my injury. I’m assuming that AW is responding to my not bopping up and down as one normally would on an elliptical, but I have the HR app on to make sure I’m keeping my HR high, and I keep refreshing it. Again, the algorithm should detect the HR changes, especially since I’ve had the watch for a year now I’d’ve hoped it’d’ve picked up on my HR patterns by now.
3. I’ve never used “Other” for a workout. I don’t usually use “Cross Training” or HIIT either, because I never know what horrors my kickboxing coach will dream up for that day and it may not fit squarely in either category. Plus, I’d have to turn it on before wrapping and gloving my hands, and it feels like cheating if I then end up BS’ing with my coach for 15 minutes or just practicing technique, which really isn’t that cardio-intensive.
The bottom line to me is that I’d like my Move ring to close and my smart device to eventually learn that 120+ minutes of high HR (or closely spaced alternating high/low HR intervals) combined with lots of upper body movement throughout the day IS moving, even if I’m only clocking 3-4 miles a day right now. I’m not so concerned about the calorie count per se except as a metric of moving. I like to close my rings, even if it does make me a Skinnerian cliche...