greenstork said:
To me, the pay per episode model seems shabby compared to the TiVo model and if an Apple fanatic like me think there are better tools out there than the iTVS for getting my favorite television, then Apple is in trouble. For success, Apple needs all of its fanboys and more with the competition it will soon face.
What you say is mostly true:
1) ITVS @ $1.99 per show (no commercials, fast(er) download)
vs
2) Tivo2Go @ $0 per show (commercials slow(er) download).
assuming... assuming... that the same content is available from both sources.
And, there's the difference:
Tivo2Go will, likely, always have the advantage of currently available content (this week/month/year's TV Programs and Reruns).
But there is a pile of content that is not currently being televised!
What if someone wants to buy/show, on demand: Ally McBeal, Milton Berle, SNL with Chevy Chase, SuperBowl III, the Hitchcock "Leg of Lamb" episode, Jean Shepherd's tribute to "Beer"... yadda, yadda, yadda.
This stuff exists!
Some people (me included) want to buy this stuff!
I don't think the current business model for TV programming can justify broadcasting these: 1) to make money; and 2) satisfy a the (relatively) small demand.
But, take this content, convert it to digital (when necessary) and offer it for sale/download/streaming on the web... all it takes is some server space & bandwidth!
This is where I think the iTVS will succeed: by offering something, that you just can't get anywhere else, at any price!
Dick