Same with Google Earth & Apple's Maps.Erm... aren't I to be the judge at that? I required the navigation software about 6 times in the past two weeks whilst I was in London. It got me there, safe and sound, and therefore fulfilled my expectations.
Same with Google Earth & Apple's Maps.Erm... aren't I to be the judge at that? I required the navigation software about 6 times in the past two weeks whilst I was in London. It got me there, safe and sound, and therefore fulfilled my expectations.
translation: "sorry you haven't been reading macrumors 24/7 for the past 2 months otherwise you would know that these RUMORS are true for this UNRELEASED app"![]()
well, in my car i have built in bluetooth so all calls are routed over bluetooth, and audio is via aux out, exactly as the tomtom dock will work
calls cannot be run in the background
also, there are many different conflicting articles - all apparently coming from the president etc
and finally, if it were possible to do simultaneous calls and gps, would tomtom not have highlighted this at the WWDC keynote? if it were possible it would be a major feature they would have highlighted
how do you know this? the SDK allows devs to connect to bluetooth devices, but if it were a handsfree device, it would still use the standard phone app to handle calls - which kicks you out of any app when a call comes inWell, no it isn't. If they make a bluetooth connection from within the application using the accessory framework (just as stated that they'll utilize within the WWDC video) then it doesn't have to hand it off.
no, but you can see whenever a call comes in, in any app, it comes up with the calling screen. if it did not, there is not an on-screen way to answer or reject the callAre you a developer to know this isn't possible with 3.x?
there are many reports on the internet with conflicting info, such as whether the app will store map data on the device or download it OTA, or whether it will be a subscription bassed app or a one off payment.I haven't seen any conflict yet in any major media or respectable website quote. Can you tell me what conflict has been stated so far? I've posted a lot of articles here and have yet to see a conflict in the content of the quotes for any of them. The only thing I've ever seen is them specifically not commenting on release dates. People here keep saying the "release date" is late summer. I've never seen "late summer" used officially in anything. He stated this summer in the WWDC video, it's coming soon on the website, and was quoted in one article as later this summer in an article.
so how can you say that "TomTom has stated simultaneous call and navigation.". You've just completely contradicted yourselfThe Bluetooth speakerphone wasn't even mentioned either within the WWDC video but the TomTom VP and several other sources say the cradle has it. While he never used the word simultaneous he did state that use of the cradle can handle hands-free calliing, GPS and music and that statement was made specifically related to the cradle. There was nothing more nor less specific than that. A lot of people falsely reported that the cradle would have an FM transmitter and that was squashed within two articles that said it had to be a hard cable connection to the audio port on the dock. The video was only a few minutes long. More information came out later from people who spoke to those two TomTom corporate officers.
from this link, it says
There are also logistical issues. For example, because the iPhone doesn't support background processes, any navigation app must shut down during phone calls, making real-time tracking difficult
there are many reports on the internet with conflicting info, such as whether the app will store map data on the device or download it OTA, or whether it will be a subscription bassed app or a one off payment.
but as you said: I'm not going to go back and repost every link I've posted on Macrumors already for nearly two months
so how can you say that "TomTom has stated simultaneous call and navigation.". You've just completely contradicted yourself
granted, but the bluetooth handsfree on the tomtom dock must register itself as a handsfree device in order to tell the iphone that it handles calls, so cannot use the SDK accessory API to do this, and so therefore the phone app will run in the foregroundI don't put faith in that quote because that's the article author stating that based on how he has seen the iPhone work with applications. That isn't a quote nor was anything asked of the TomTom VP about it.
then why are so many people guessing if it has clearly been answered? clearly there is a lot of grey areas to do with functionalityThere has never once been any conflicting piece of information from any TomTom officer quoted on how the maps would be stored (OTA or download). As a matter of fact, the TomTom president outright directly stated it's a download and that same article stated they aren't going with a monthly subscription model. Never once was there ever a quote from either one about a monthly subscription model. You're repeating guesses people have made in articles. I said something that came from a quote. Period.
then why are so many people guessing if it has clearly been answered? clearly there is a lot of grey areas to do with functionality
A lot of people falsely reported that the cradle would have an FM transmitter and that was squashed within two articles that said it had to be a hard cable connection to the audio port on the dock.
This is an interesting little tidbit of information that I think is going to make the TomTom external dock be extremely pricey (speculation I know).
Reason I say that is that because in order to correctly implement Apple's dock signaling, you have to pony up major $$ (I heard $100k or better) to get on board with the NDA approval, as well as receive the software and circuit designs. This is where that 'This accessory is not made to work with iPhone' message comes from if you connect something to the dock that's not signaling properly. I believe this is the 'Works with iPhone' program so that you can use that Apple logo.
Isn't the only other fully implemented audio/line out/charging/control dock vehicle accessory made by Kensington LiquidAUX at ~$70+?
Speculation as well as business practice says that TomTom has to pass this initial 'Works with iPhone' cost onto their customers....
I'll bet that the TomTom software and cradle are going to be the most expensive TBT solution.
You managed to mirror in every one of your comments things I've said in the past.
Haven't really followed everything you've posted (sorry!).
My comments are more from the time I've spent researching the iPod/iPhone's dock connectivity....from the mostly straight forward iPod into the new signaling and circuitry on the iPhone....even to the point of soldering up a few LODs in my spare time for use with headphone amps to be able to use the line out signal, and charge the device, all while not getting the 'This accessory.....iPhone' message.
But, yeah, the TomTom solution (software + hardware) I'm guessing in the $150+ range (if not even more). Also adding to the cost, you gotta factor in the 30% fee for selling the App through the App Store. I don't see how they are going to sell it as a 'package'.
normally drive 15-20mph over the speed limit anyways soon as i seen that 70mph speed limit i put it on 90mph cruise and had no problems with cops they only mess with you if your driving crazy.
Wow. If you guys are right and TomTom is going to cost $150+ for the dock solution, I don't see them selling that many. You can easily just get a stand alone device for that. IMO, they need to price the software at $75-$100 and the kit at no more than $120 or it isn't worth it. Is there any real advantage to the TomTom cradle if you already have a bluetooth car connection? It seems the Navigon software works fine without an extra GPS chip.
Peronally, I already have bluetooth and an iPod dock integrated into my car but the dock is in the glove compartment so I am planning on using an old Nano for Music and putting a dash or windshield mount on so that I can take calls/use navigation software with my iphone.
If I end up going for the Navigon because it is better or a better value what is the best dashboard or windshield mount out there? I have seen the Kensington dashboard and windshield ones and the Gmaps one...
Those prices make it instantly not worth it in the UK. $362.28 for the newest model, that boasts more features than iPhone version.
AAAHH: TomTom site is offline now... hmm what are they updatingiPhone... come here NOW....
Well you can get a stand alone unit here for $75 that has more features but a tiny screen.. Still I can see them putting a bit of a premium on the convenience of having it in a phone. Also, as someone pointed out, if you have more than 1 phone and it isn't against the license to install the software on more than 1 then it is a bargain... I won't pay a significant surcharge over the Navigon software though unless it is ALOT better. Thus, I am considering other mounting options...
Well you can get a stand alone unit here for $75 that has more features but a tiny screen.. Still I can see them putting a bit of a premium on the convenience of having it in a phone.
Wow. If you guys are right and TomTom is going to cost $150+ for the dock solution, I don't see them selling that many. You can easily just get a stand alone device for that. IMO, they need to price the software at $75-$100 and the kit at no more than $120 or it isn't worth it.
That's the thing, I'll be getting a 3G S this August hopefully (wish me luck, certification exam results). I currently have the original iPhone.
The screens aren't that tiny anymore, the one we have is bigger than the iPhone, then again, that's the smallest here.
TomTom can make this work, or fail miserably.
I'm not sure what they have in Europe but I went to the store yesterday and looked and the TomTom One was about $80 but had a screen at least 1/3 smaller than an iPhone screen. Now for around $120 you can get Garmin Nuvi with about the same size screen. I hope the TomTom software is below $100 and has the same features as their high end units. If so, it will be a hard choice between that and Navigon's solution.
The dock is another ball of wax altogether. Unless it offers a huge boost in gps signal or is really cheap when bundled with the software, it seems like it will be a ripoff to me. Of course as I said, I already have Bluetooth and an iPod connector built into my car so I would only use it as a mount and charger...
I know it has to be tough for TomTom and Garmin if they enter this market because they don't want to undercut their existing product lines... If I were in their position though I would be very agressive. Because if they aren't, somebody else will be and they will lose a lot of money. We have already seen startups make apps on the AppStore that compete with major publishers because the big guys are appathetic.
TomTom's GPS antenna isn't going to make the GPS antenna on the phone better at all. The mount has its own antenna and the GPS antenna in the phone will be bypassed while in the dock. A GPS only uses one antenna at a time.
As for the difference, it woud be significant. The internal GPS antenna of an iPhone is tiny. There are teardown pictures online that show the antenna plane of an iPhone. A GPS patch antenna is significantly larger. TomTom would be using a traditional patch antenna in the dock which would have significant signal retention and stability advantages. I just looked up typical patch sizes and a "medium" antenna is approximately 1" square. That's larger than the the entire antenna plane of the iPhone which contains the GPS and cellular antennas.
To give a real-world example of usability, I have attempted to do Geocaching with my iPhone and it did a terrible job. Any level of tree canopy and the error grew to >300 feet. That is completely unusable for Geocaching purposes as it becomes a needle in the haystack. The only way I could use my phone was to be in an area with a completely unrestricted view of the sky.
Unfortunately, developers have no access to individual signal levels for the internal receiver so no application exists that has a display of every signal channel as you would find in a typical handheld GPS. That's likely to be intentional as Apple probably doesn't want that to be seen.