Toshiba to ship notebook with 4k screen

Pentad

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Nov 26, 2003
985
96
Indiana
Toshiba showed off their notebook with a 4k screen which is set to ship mid-2014.

You can read it here.


I wonder if Apple will add a 4k screen to the MBP line this year?

-P
 

B's iPhone

macrumors regular
Jul 9, 2008
111
68
Where it's cold
I wouldn't be opposed to a 4k display even though it's kind of pointless on a 15" screen.
I wouldn't own another toshiba machine again though. The two I've owned we're built terribly.
 
Comment

jkcerda

macrumors 6502a
Jun 10, 2013
824
41,268
Criminal Mexi Midget
I wouldn't be opposed to a 4k display even though it's kind of pointless on a 15" screen.
I wouldn't own another toshiba machine again though. The two I've owned we're built terribly.
had no issues with mine at all, if it wasn't for X-Code, a toshiba would be my re-order, cheaper price & better hardware wise.
 
Comment

TechZeke

macrumors 68020
Jul 29, 2012
2,372
2,023
San Antonio, TX
My guess is that the 4K notebook Apple will release is the 17" rMBP. It's the only way I see it happening. Anything higher than 2880x1800 on the 15" would be pointless. The 17" would be next logical step, as 1920x1200 in retina would give 4K.

Also, this is clearly a stunt to be first out with 4K laptop. Judging by the chassis shape and size, Toshiba spent no development on making it thinner or lighter. I can at least give Dell(XPS 15) credit for making such a comparable laptop with identical thickness to a rMBP. This looks they took a classic Toshiba chassis and slapped a 4K display on it.
 
Last edited:
Comment

zipa

macrumors 65816
Feb 19, 2010
1,442
1
Judging by the chassis shape and size, Toshiba spent no development on making it thinner or lighter.

Thin and light are non-issues to the vast majority of consumers and business users. Most people don't want to pay extra for that. A 4k-laptop that's bolted on to a video editing rack would probably not be chosen on the merits of its external dimensions but its technical specs.
 
Comment

Wuiffi

macrumors 6502a
Oct 6, 2011
686
78
I'd love a 17" rMBP. For the 15" I found 1680x1050 (Hi Res on the old models) to be the sweet spot for me personally, but I see how some might prefer a 4k (1080p equivalent) widescreendisplay for watching movie etc.

But I am wondering about the performance. According to Arstechnica quadcore and dedicated GPU are optional, so the base model is probably going for a dualcore chip like the one in the 13" model. The HD5100 (Intel Iris) is a capable GPU at pushing those pixels, but I don't see it do anything else than just basic writing and surfing stuff.
 
Comment

Doward

macrumors 6502a
Feb 21, 2013
526
8
I'd love a 17" rMBP. For the 15" I found 1680x1050 (Hi Res on the old models) to be the sweet spot for me personally, but I see how some might prefer a 4k (1080p equivalent) widescreendisplay for watching movie etc.
Apple comes out with a 17" rMBP, and I'd sell mine in a heartbeat to get my hands on one!
 
Comment

Wuiffi

macrumors 6502a
Oct 6, 2011
686
78
Apple comes out with a 17" rMBP, and I'd sell mine in a heartbeat to get my hands on one!
When I bought my last macbook in 2010, and I thought 15" was the perfect size. When I traveled a lot (watching movies in the train) and writing at the university, I thought I should have gone for the 13" (which in 2010 with it's Core 2 Duo processors was out of the question).
But after buying an iPad which is ideal for the train and some notes in pdfs I thin I'd go for a 17" rMBP as it's the probably the best desktop replacement you could buy!
 
Comment

Pentad

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Nov 26, 2003
985
96
Indiana
I too thought that a 4k 17" notebook would be a great for the return of the 17" MBP line. I would probably switch to the 17" if they brought it back with a 4k screen.

That would be quite a powerful, portable workstation.


-P
 
Comment

TechZeke

macrumors 68020
Jul 29, 2012
2,372
2,023
San Antonio, TX
Thin and light are non-issues to the vast majority of consumers and business users. Most people don't want to pay extra for that. A 4k-laptop that's bolted on to a video editing rack would probably not be chosen on the merits of its external dimensions but its technical specs.
I completely agree, but the fact is is that every manufacturer is releasing thin laptops. This laptop would to have very high end specs and be under $1300 to justify.

My main point though is that they are lagging behind if they clearly haven't spent any development on form factor.

While I myself don't mind a thicker laptop, it is pretty disappointing to see this as their flagship when so many other manufacturers have released hi-resolution, high performing ultra thin laptops.

Again, hopefully this thickness is from putting in a more beefy GPU to power that display.
 
Comment

raptor402

macrumors 6502
Jun 30, 2011
399
2
In my opinion, Apple should standardised screen resolutions across models. 13" (Air and Pro) should be 1440*900 (2880*1800 in retina), 15" should be 1680*1050 (3360*2100 in retina) and the 17" (if there ever is one again), should be 1920*1080 (4k in retina).

My only complaints against the present rMBPs is the low effective resolution. My mid-2010 15" MBP with the Hi-Res display is just perfect. My father's 13" rMBP is almost intolerable at 1280*800 scaled resolution. Heck, my father's 9 year old Dell had the same resolution. Scaling to 1440*900 is an option (the only way I use it), but the performance takes a hit and it's definitely not ideal.

Maybe in the next generation...

As for the 17", there is a very small market for such a pro laptop; it's Google Reader all over again (or rather the other way round, since the 17" MBP went first). However, following the Mac Pro's new non-expandable ideology, I'm quite sure that the lack of internal expansion and customisation is not the reason the laptop won't work.

Raptor
 
Comment

Mr. Retrofire

macrumors 603
Mar 2, 2010
5,040
470
www.emiliana.cl/en
Apple comes out with a 17" rMBP, and I'd sell mine in a heartbeat to get my hands on one!
A 17" requires probably a Broadwell iGPU, if you want 3840x2400@60fps (60 fps is the standard OS X GUI refresh rate). In my tests 30 fps were enough for 2D GUI elements (web pages, Word documents, Photoshop images, ...).
 
Comment

Wuiffi

macrumors 6502a
Oct 6, 2011
686
78
A 17" requires probably a Broadwell iGPU, if you want 3840x2400@60fps (60 fps is the standard OS X GUI refresh rate). In my tests 30 fps were enough for 2D GUI elements (web pages, Word documents, Photoshop images, ...).
doesn't the 15" rMBP perform good at a scaled 1920x1200 resolution, where the GPU effectively renders everything at 3840x2400 before downsampling to 2880x1800?
But more GPU (iGPU for the UI) power is always welcome!
 
Comment

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
349
  • xrb936
2
Replies
2
Views
356
  • ScreenSavers
19
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • globalmatt
12
Replies
12
Views
2K
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.