Tariffs are contributing to price fixing as some American manufacturers, such as home appliances, have started taking advantage by raising prices on products made and sold in the US. So much for competition.
WSJ: China Holds Fire in Latest Trade Skirmish with U.S.
While Beijing has met previous volleys of tariffs from the U.S. by raising duties on American goods—and the government has promised to retaliate—it held its fire. Though China has more limited tariff options, since it imports fewer products from the U.S. than the other way around, the Chinese leadership is also constrained by an economy that is in a shaky recovery from a sharp slowdown.
The tariff escalation is worrisome for Chinese officials, who are watching potential ripple effects, from weakening of the currency to crimping future foreign investment. Raising existing tariffs or imposing new ones could hit products China’s economy needs, like semiconductors, pork, oil and passenger jets.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-...kirmish-with-u-s-11557571638?mod=hp_lead_pos1 (paywall)
Weakening their currency would be the better option for them.
The problem with his trade deficit talk, especially with China, is that American companies shifted manufacturing to China, for greater profits. And now we're buying from China. It's not entirely China's doing.
Broad Support for Trump's China Fight Faces Test as Tariffs Escalate
WASHINGTON—President Trump has enjoyed rare bipartisan cheering for his brass-knuckle trade fight with China, but that support will now be tested as U.S. businesses and consumers shoulder higher tariffs on Chinese imports.
The yearlong conflict has barely dented the U.S. economy so far, but new 25% tariffs imposed Friday, along with the administration’s steps to expand levies to virtually everything from China, are raising concerns even among some Republicans.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/broad-...tariffs-escalate-11557658801?mod=hp_lead_pos2
Give it time for the sheep to realize that it cost them a lot of money out of their own pockets to support a Trump policy that does not benefit them in any financial way. In fact it will be a burden on their financial status just to help Trump implement his tariffs policy. Trump sure did sell it to the fools to get them to pay more money out of their pockets to the government. The con-artist managed to con people in to forking over more of their income to the government for nothing in return.
Wealth is built off of savings and not off of higher expenses. China also has competition from neighboring countries as well for manufacturing. The only reason the others were not called out was because they did not call for oil futures in their own currencies and call out for trade with other countries via their own new banking system which would no longer require all financial transactions to be processed via New York in the US. Majority of the companies listed on Wall Street would not have their current valuations had their profit margins not been where they are now due to products manufactured overseas.Did you read the article?
Of course it will cost. Have you ever thought about sacrifice for future goals and well-being? The idea that China abuses other countries is not new and is a bipartisan idea.
Wealth is built off of savings and not off of higher expenses. China also has competition from neighboring countries as well for manufacturing. The only reason the others were not called out was because they did not call for oil futures in their own currencies and call out for trade with other countries via their own new banking system which would no longer require all financial transactions to be processed via New York in the US. Majority of the companies listed on Wall Street would not have their current valuations had their profit margins not been where they are now due to products manufactured overseas.
Are you tired of winning yet?You could also call this price fixing
Funny how we use the term “Free Trade” only when it is to our likings.Trump makes it sound nice by saying “We like this because we are going to start getting paid for this. $100 Billion “ all this money (what ever amount it is comes out of the pockets of American consumers”. When prices go up that mean retail prices go up and when retail prices go up that mean the government now collects money on the new retail price so they get even more money out of this.
Say an item before sold for $10 and government collected $.90 sales tax bringing it to $10.90 the new price will now be $12.50 before taxes and $13.62 after taxes. At first the government collected $.90 but now it collected $1.12 in taxes which means that they also collected 25% more in sales tax from the dummies that supported Trump on this but unfortunately all others have to pay this now as well. So in reality the government now collects and extra 25% at customs raising price by 25% for consumers then the government collects an additional 25% from the consumer as well from sales tax (difference being from $.90 to $1.12). In reality one could say we got two additional 25% increases on cost. One that raises product cost before taxes and one that raises sales tax amount paid from new higher price sold at.![]()
That's different from strategic economic policy where you want to benefit the whole country and generations down the road.
Problem is that fighting the symptoms just won't work.
The US is addicted to debt both government and private and the $ is the worlds reserve currency so all that debt will be easily swallowed by other countries or (foreign) companies.
The only way they get those $ is by sending goods over to the US.
If the $ wasn't a reserve country it would have already entered freefall like the currencies of Turkey or Argentina resulting in a much lower standard of living for the average US citizen.
Same result if you'd stopped taking on more debt.
Now the (mis)handling of IP in China for sure is a real problem, but it is just not that directly connected to the trade deficit.
At least they won't get bad keyboards.
I exited my risk positions last week and am mainly in defensive positions. I do not believe that this will resolve in a short period of time and that there could be damage to the markets.
The action on Friday was pointed out to me by technician Helene Meisler as a gap fill. The candle tails were also within standard Fibonacci Retracements.
A very talented technician that I chat with expects new highs on the $SPX before it plunges. It's something that I keep in mind because the guy is a magician.
I was referring to 2016-2018 MacBook Pros on keyboard quality.