Unsurprising.
The specific information about the capabilities of the new handset would be provided by Apple, not their suppliers. You'll have to wait for Apple's official announcement, that's really the only credible source of information.
98% of Apple rumors on tech media sites end up being wrong anyhow. The only source you can look with confidence is www.apple.com/pr. Everywhere else is basically random speculative B.S. Good for a laugh, but not much more.
Unless ATT/VZW gives early upgrades, I don't see a lot of people upgrading anyways?
Damn, when are they going to announce it
I'm caught between two good phones. Galaxy SII and the iPhone 4S/5.
I haven't decided which to go for yet. If the iPhone 4S/5 has good features (equal or more to the SII) I'll go with the iPhone.
If not, then the Galaxy it is.
Been there, done that. I had the Galaxy S II for 3 weeks (imported). I went right back to an iPhone 4.
If Apple doesn't come up with a substantially redesigned iPhone I will definetly get a life.
Yes, if I recall correctly, the communications chips in some of the iPods have actually supported FM radio, but Apple has never implemented this functionality in the iPod touch (it might have appeared in the nano once or twice).Yup, previous apple phones have had chips in them capable of things that weren't turned on. Specifically, iphone 4 CDMA version capable of GSM and I think the 3GS was capable of N band wifi but only supported G.
Been there, done that. I had the Galaxy S II for 3 weeks (imported). I went right back to an iPhone 4.
Mmmm....Apple tacos.....![]()
For real ? .. why ?![]()
Yes, if I recall correctly, the communications chips in some of the iPods have actually supported FM radio, but Apple has never implemented this functionality in the iPod touch (it might have appeared in the nano once or twice).
Also, Apple sometimes underclocks the CPU to improve battery performance.
The lesson here is that one cannot look at a component supplier's spec sheet to determine what capabilities a given Apple device has.
I hear you man! I do IT for living and a lot of my friends tease me for not going with the open, flash-supporting, flexible Android that I can hack and do whatever with. But you know what? No, towards the end of the day, I want a great intuitive phone that just works an integrates well with what I have. In that department, the iPhone is still unmatched.iOS just has the APPS! Android Market is weak in comparison. I am also a big media consumer. Music, podcasts, etc. iOS and iTunes integration just handles it all better. iPhoto integration. iMovie... Gaming... There is probably a 20:1 ratio of available games from iOS to Android.
True, but they have underclocked a Samsung ARM CPU in a previous model, before they started designing their own SoCs.Since they write their own spec sheets, I wouldn't say the A4 or A5 is underclocked![]()
Don't get me wrong. The GSII is a VERY NICE and VERY capable device. It was not so much an iPhone vs. Galaxy S II issue as it was was an iOS vs. Android issue.
iOS just has the APPS! Android Market is weak in comparison. I am also a big media consumer. Music, podcasts, etc. iOS and iTunes integration just handles it all better. iPhoto integration. iMovie... Gaming... There is probably a 20:1 ratio of available games from iOS to Android.
Oh... and Apple wipes the floor with everyone when it comes to battery life.
And iPhone has TONS more accessories and cases available for it. The benefit of making 1 version of the iPhone at a time.
Believe me... I have tried MANY times to switch to Android. I ALWAYS come back.
If I were going to stick with Android, Galaxy S II would be my choice.
It will be interesting to see if the iPhone 5 goes for the qualcomm all-in-one solution for the radio.
You know i too would enjoy iPhone/iPods/iTouch with radio, but perhaps apple does not like the radio so you have no access to music until you render yourself useless to the itunes store...
There are probably radio apps available now anyways. To use up your precious data