People don't petition or complain when the house that they bought for $100,000 costs extra for electricity, water, gas, etc.
I bet some of them do!
People don't petition or complain when the house that they bought for $100,000 costs extra for electricity, water, gas, etc.
People don't petition or complain when the house that they bought for $100,000 costs extra for electricity, water, gas, etc.
I believe we're talking about the TV commercial.
I could agree with your point if Apple didn't require you to get a AT&T contract at the point of sale. But they do, so I really think they need to admit in ads to the things they REQUIRE at the time of purchse.
No one's saying Apple has to put a price in the ads. They're just saying they shouldn't say "half the price."
That would be like Toyota running an ad saying their car is $12,000 and doesn't need gas. Gee, I don't think I've ever seen Toyota try that! So why is Apple?
A car needs gas and a phone needs service. Neither Apple nor Toyota needs to say ANYTHING about that in their ads. That's fine. So ignoring it is ok, but that's far different from saying it doesn't exist, which is what we have here.
I don't think the OP was necessarily saying that it was too expensive for him, or claiming that Apple is the company setting the monthly rates.
The point is that Apple knows how much buying this new 3g iPhone will cost over the lifetime of the required contract (I'm referring specifically to the US in this case). So even if it's not their call what to charge as a subscription price, they're being a bit disingenuous to advertise the phone as if it's half the price overall. Sure, the handset itself is cheaper, but one can't buy it alone. One is required to sign a contract.
My issue isn't with the price itself, it's with Apple continuing to insist via their advertising that the new phone is cheaper, when it clearly isn't once required fees are taken into account. I generally think of Apple as too classy to stoop to those levels of shady salesmanship and wish they'd just stand behind their product as is, without trying to sucker less-informed customers.
This
I'm not sure why people are so hostile towards logical arguments such as this one.
Additionally, can you show me ANY cell manufacturer that lists the associated costs (plan, fees, taxes) anywhere in their advertising. Serisouly, show me where Samsung, Palm, Motorolla, etc. mention this in their ads. It's ok, I'll wait.
Additionally, can you show me ANY cell manufacturer that lists the associated costs (plan, fees, taxes) anywhere in their advertising. Serisouly, show me where Samsung, Palm, Motorolla, etc. mention this in their ads. It's ok, I'll wait.
Again that is not Apple's fault.
AT&T is subsidizing the phone to reach that "half-price" figure, and they are making up for it with the data fees. If apple were to sell the phone separately the cost would be just as high as the current iphone. So while it may not be apple's "fault" that the data is higher, nor is it to their credit that the price is half.
You make a good point there.
So while it may not be apple's "fault" that the data is higher, nor is it to their credit that the price is half.
does this statement piss anyone else off? kind of a screwed up slogan for apple to be pushing.
All of you who are saying that it really IS half the price and that the data cost is AT&T's fault are completely wrong (or just think Apple can do no wrong). Remember, the iPhone is only that cheap BECAUSE AT&T is eating more than half the cost to give it to you that cheap which is WHY they are charging higher data prices. The iphone with NO contract is going to be $599 (8GB) and $699 (16GB). The slogan should be, "twice the speed, twice the price (except for those who at&t will subsidize the price)." You guys should be THANKING AT&T for making the price of the iphone lower, not bashing them! And even though in the long run the cost will be a little more, the value of cash now is def greater than the value of cash 2 yrs from now (not to mention after a yr, at&t allows you to upgrade a device again for the subsidized price).
AT&T is charging the same rates for the iPhone that they charge for other data phones. These rates are also comparable to other networks.
Here's the deal: The ad says:
"It surfs the web and downloads data twice as fast for half the price."
How can you read that and NOT think they are describing the service plan? If you "download data for half the price" that sure sounds like they're describing the connection fee, not the handset fee.
I know they're actually not, so don't explain that to me, but can't you agree they're trying to make it LOOK like they are?
does this statement piss anyone else off? kind of a screwed up slogan for apple to be pushing.