Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This could be a nice experiment, being the data collectors these companies are in general against all the laws.

The human brain being left to its own devices can only process social structures of up to 120 ~ 150 individuals (which is huge). Tribes of yesteryears would cap at those, companies could naturally grow up to that before a major company structures (multiple C management, HRs, etc) are a must, if someone tries to grow their own FB (or similar) on their own would probably cap close to that too.

Facebook, IG, Tweets, Corporate conglomerates of 10K, 100K people. 1M - 10M followers, 1Billion video/profile/picture views are an aberration made possible by technology.

As much as I dislike certain social media in general I must say that this Flock thing is quite interesting.
?? I came here to mention Dunbar’s Number...

But I also came here to note that this will just further the echo-chamber/bubble aspect, but that’s what “social networking” wants to do to fulfill their advertising aims, which is the ONLY thing any of this crap is about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
Weird naming aside, the feature makes sense.

I made a link-sharing app a while back that worked purely like this, with posts only going to a few close friends who could in turn repost them within their circles so they'd spread far over time. In my closed beta group, it was actually the best thing I've ever used for sharing news and videos. But I'm awful at marketing, and social apps are the hardest to market.

There are already social studies supporting this concept as a way to spread complex ideas. Turns out, overly connecting everyone (like on non-flock Twitter) instead boosts simple ideas like anger. Feels vindicating yet frustrating to see Twitter slowly going down that route instead of me.
 
Last edited:
This could be a nice experiment, being the data collectors these companies are in general against all the laws.

The human brain being left to its own devices can only process social structures of up to 120 ~ 150 individuals (which is huge). Tribes of yesteryears would cap at those, companies could naturally grow up to that before a major company structures (multiple C management, HRs, etc) are a must, if someone tries to grow their own FB (or similar) on their own would probably cap close to that too.

Facebook, IG, Tweets, Corporate conglomerates of 10K, 100K people. 1M - 10M followers, 1Billion video/profile/picture views are an aberration made possible by technology.

As much as I dislike certain social media in general I must say that this Flock thing is quite interesting.
One group of 20 can be led by a single person, then each of those single people can be part of another 20-person group, and so on. That's how massive corporations work, with or without technology to aid in it.

Twitter is a huge mess because it's instead millions of people each connected to like 1000 random other people. Drama, witch hunts, propaganda, clickbait, fake news, scams, market manipulation, etc rule there. I actually find FB a lot more tame cause it's just people who are sorta IRL friends.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: amartinez1660
Twitter is horrific micro-blogging network.

If people only knew about Mastodon and how much saner it is, no one will stay on Twitter.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.