what ight be a better idea is not to release major movies(ala xmen 3 for fox or superman returns for wb) untl the holiday season is over, but allow iTunes users to buy older movies a year old/classics and hope someone wants them
slidingjon said:If iTunes can become the #5 retailer of audio music (proposed for 1st quarter 2007), then why don't the movie distributors see this as a potential avenue for success?
The Toon Master said:what ight be a better idea is not to release major movies(ala xmen 3 for fox or superman returns for wb) untl the holiday season is over, but allow iTunes users to buy older movies a year old/classics and hope someone wants them
Donz0r said:except by that time anyone who wants xmen 3 or superman returns will have already bought it on DVD. the itunes movies need to be available the same time as the DVDs if they're to be successful at all.
Donz0r said:Because Numbers 1 and 2 (walmart and target) are threatening to stop carrying the studio's dvds in their stores. Which would you rather sell you product at? 1 and 2? or just 5?
But they'll come around, wal mart and target will not stop selling DVDs. I hope.
Oblivious said:New Line Cinema hopefully?
It would be very cool to see The Lord of the Rings trilogy on iTunes.![]()
Of course, I already have them all, so it would be much use to me.
Macrumors said:Munster does not believe any studios will sign on before Christmas as this may disturb retail DVD sales.
Yes it costs money, no it's not significant compared to the costs of making the content that goes on the DVD, no Hollywood bean counters don't care how small the savings are as they pinch pennies anywhere they can.bdj21ya said:No, but with the cost of the designers, printing, materials, packaging, shipping, storage, and all the employees along the way, the cost is at least a few bucks per DVD.
The dimensions of the image are only part of the equation. The data rate and the type of compression used play a bigger part in terms of quality. For example, a DVD w/a constant bit rate of 2Mbit/s will look much worse than a DVD w/a constant bit rate of 8Mbit/s even though they are both 720x480 and both use the same MPEG-2 compression.Donz0r said:DVD resolution is 720x480 right? itunes movies are 640x480?
Why don't they just make the damn movies 720x480 so they can say that they're "DVD Quality Movies" instead of "Near DVD Quality"
Most people, who don't know dvd and itunes resolution or dont even know what resolution IS, are turned off by "Near DVD Quality"
They could have a seperate download for 4:3 resolution for the iPod, or just play the 720x480 aspect ratio on the ipod with letterbox, it's not like anyone watches movies on their damn ipods anyway (yet...)
Or NewLine and Fox.macfan881 said:Hope that its WB and its Fox
Donz0r said:DVD resolution is 720x480 right? itunes movies are 640x480?
Why don't they just make the damn movies 720x480 so they can say that they're "DVD Quality Movies" instead of "Near DVD Quality"
Most people, who don't know dvd and itunes resolution or dont even know what resolution IS, are turned off by "Near DVD Quality"
They could have a seperate download for 4:3 resolution for the iPod, or just play the 720x480 aspect ratio on the ipod with letterbox, it's not like anyone watches movies on their damn ipods anyway (yet...)
Donz0r said:Because Numbers 1 and 2 (walmart and target) are threatening to stop carrying the studio's dvds in their stores. Which would you rather sell you product at? 1 and 2? or just 5?
But they'll come around, wal mart and target will not stop selling DVDs. I hope.
A boost for sales would be to have the movie store available in the Canadian iTunes store. It also friggin' sucks being completely left out of the whole thing. TV shows too.edcrosay said:Or NewLine and Fox.
Having LOTR and Star Wars would definatly boost sales for the movie store....
but I don't see it happening anytime soon.