That isn't good marketing, that's snake-oil salesmanship
Good marketing includes successfully persuading people to buy what you have to sell. If you've just invested millions developing a lemon, you better start hyping up lemonade, at least for the next quarter. If you start educating them they might go and buy a competing product.
I like my iPad very much, and use it almost every day. But if I could go back to the pre-split-screen, pre-drag-and-drop interface I would. Which is to say, now that iPadOS has its own name, I wish I could install the iPhone’s one-app-on-screen-at-a-time, no-drag-and-drop iOS on my iPad Pro. I’d do it in a heartbeat and be much happier for it.
The iPad at 10 is, to me, a grave disappointment. Not because it’s “bad”, because it’s not bad — it’s great even — but because great though it is in so many ways, overall it has fallen so far short of the grand potential it showed on day one. To reach that potential, Apple needs to recognize they have made profound conceptual mistakes in the iPad user interface, mistakes that need to be scrapped and replaced, not polished and refined. I worry that iPadOS 13 suggests the opposite — that Apple is steering the iPad full speed ahead down a blind alley.
"the team was surprised to see how much people were using it to take photos."
I laughed when I saw people use iPad to take photos. Dude, you have your phone!
Gruber really harsh on iPad. I’m not sure what potential he’s referring to. If iPad goes back to being just a big phone I think that will be a disaster. And won’t increase the product’s potential. Interesting that he’s way harsher on it than people who use it a lot like Federico Vittici and Jason Snell.
Marketing is about educating; sales is about persuading.
If a company really does develop a bad product, no amount of good marketing will fix that.
Never used Windows 95 then...
Start me up!
Truly? If it was the device you had at the time and you had a good experience, I appreciate that. But wasn’t the 3rd-gen iPad the worst of the bunch? The first with a retina screen, but too slow a processor to properly drive it. The last with a 30-pin connector and heavier and thicker than the previous generation. I’m pretty sure it only lasted six months.It’s still my favorite computing device of all time. Especially the 3rd gen
Basically Ben Thompson agrees with Gruber. I don’t. Sure multi-tasking isn’t perfect and text selection could be better. But their arguments aren‘t really about making multi-tasking better but that iPad is too complicated. But it seems to me the reason iPad Pro aNd eventually iPadOS were created was because iPad sales were flat to declining. If you were using iPad as mostly a consumption device (browsing web, email, watching video) then you didn’t really need much from the device and an iPad 2 would last forever.I think Stratechery adds important insights to DF's argument. Link:
![]()
The Tragic iPad
The iPad is 10, and while it remains a useful device, it is ultimately a disappointment. Apple lost the vision for what the iPad could be, and never gave space for developers to figure it out for t…stratechery.com
Truly? If it was the device you had at the time and you had a good experience, I appreciate that. But wasn’t the 3rd-gen iPad the worst of the bunch? The first with a retina screen, but too slow a processor to properly drive it. The last with a 30-pin connector and heavier and thicker than the previous generation. I’m pretty sure it only lasted six months.