Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
For what it’s worth about some of those firms, they themselves should be investigated for antitrust violations. Match Group comes to mind given their near monopoly on online dating and Tinder’s commanding share of the online dating market.
 
The iPhone is Apple’s product. It’s not up to anyone else to crack it open and fiddle around with it and make users unsafe.

Sony had a global monopoly with the Walkman and nobody took action on them. They also become one of the big players in the video and film industry. Where are they now? Something better came along and they couldn’t compete in the portable space.

If the Justice Department want to do something serious they should be using all their resources against unregulated ponzi scams and manipulated markets that are making some very dangerous and extremist people rich and they will use their wealth to finance terrorist white supremacists, mafias and coup d’etat wherever they reach.
No..................... the iPhone is MINE at least according to the very expensive receipt.
 
What are the chances this actually goes anywhere? Although, if Apple ends up forced to spin off some of its crappy services and loses App Store revenue, I view that as a positive. Maybe that will force them to stop trying to force tons of subscriptions on us and go back to hardware innovation as their only chance for growth. One can dream....

Apple's not a monopoly, though. They have a minority of market share and face competition in every category.
 
Of course the Epic case will have an impact on whether the DOJ pursues a case. Apple was declared "not" a monopoly in a court of law. That sets back anything the DOJ will try to bring forward

Does Apple Suppress Third-Party App Innovation (for their own benefit) ?

Are there Prime Examples of that ?

If one looks for them, they will find them !
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech
The DOJ is very misguided on this issue. It seemingly cannot even recognize an easy anti-trust case against Google's search and Facebook's platform and instead look at Apple for policies that are indistingushable from policies that have been in place for decades by major brick and mortar retailers who make vendors play to play all the time. It is actually a disgrace and an abhorrent waste of taxpayer money. The federal government should be ashamed if this case is pursued.
 
Depends who's is office determines which companies are targeted. Democrats have no reason to go after Facebook as they are on their side. If (when) republicans are back in office they will target social networks that have a perceived liberal agenda.
?


- Now that House Democrats have completed a sweeping antitrust investigation into Facebook, Apple, Amazon, and Google, they're prepared to introduce new laws to curb the tech giants' power.

- Meanwhile, Republicans have signaled that they're on board for some — but not all — of Democrats' plans for new antitrust laws.




The Federal Trade Commission and more than 40 states sued Facebook yesterday, saying its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp unfairly eliminated competition. They called for Facebook to be split apart and restricted in making future deals, “some of the most severe penalties regulators can demand,” write The Times’s Cecilia Kang and Mike Isaac.

Big Tech’s dominance is a source of bipartisan ire, and the federal case against Facebook is expected to continue under President-elect Joe Biden. Attorneys general from 46 states, the District of Columbia and Guam signed the state suit, with only Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina and South Dakota sitting it out. The F.T.C.’s leadership was split — its Trump-appointed chairman, Joseph Simons, and the two Democratic commissioners voted to pursue its lawsuit, with the two other Republican commissioners against.




Democratic lawmakers are calling for Congress to rein in Big Tech, possibly forcing Facebook, Google, Amazon and Apple to break up their businesses, while making it harder for them to acquire others and imposing new rules to safeguard competition.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech and Saipher
Oh oh, I have mixed feelings about it as a long time iOS user but this can't be good. I think Apple will have a battle with this one.
Although iOS is buggy, features like blocking app tracking and it's sign in features, using random emails instead of my real one are why I still use it. Hope they don't force those to change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PaladinGuy
The DOJ is very misguided on this issue. It seemingly cannot even recognize an easy anti-trust case against Google's search and Facebook's platform and instead look at Apple for policies that are indistingushable from policies that have been in place for decades by major brick and mortar retailers who make vendors play to play all the time. It is actually a disgrace and an abhorrent waste of taxpayer money. The federal government should be ashamed if this case is pursued.
It’s more likely that there’s no one spending lobbying money to get them to put pressure on Facebook or Google, but Epic, et al. are lobbying the government (whether it be politicians or the DoJ itself, I honestly don’t know how lobbying works when it comes to Executive Branch cabinet level positions, it almost certainly occurs, but I don’t know if that pressure comes from congress-critters who’ve been lobbied or if lobbyists have a direct way to lobby cabinet level offices).
 
Apple did kick Epic off the platform. When you can't compete you sue.
They kicked them off for breaking the contract that Epic agreed to. Not just because they felt like it. Apple also tried to work with Epic before kicking them off but Epic threw a tantrum and told Apple to pound sand.
 
The DOJ is very misguided on this issue. It seemingly cannot even recognize an easy anti-trust case against Google's search and Facebook's platform and instead look at Apple for policies that are indistingushable from policies that have been in place for decades by major brick and mortar retailers who make vendors play to play all the time. It is actually a disgrace and an abhorrent waste of taxpayer money. The federal government should be ashamed if this case is pursued.
What is the easy anti-trust case against Facebook?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Saipher
It’s more likely that there’s no one spending lobbying money to get them to put pressure on Facebook or Google, but Epic, et al. are lobbying the government (whether it be politicians or the DoJ itself, I honestly don’t know how lobbying works when it comes to Executive Branch cabinet level positions, it almost certainly occurs, but I don’t know if that pressure comes from congress-critters who’ve been lobbied or if lobbyists have a direct way to lobby cabinet level offices).
If true, which I have no reason to doubt, it transforms a disgraceful waste of taxpayer funds into corruption and an intolerable abuse of power. This is so bad I will never vote for any of the people in currently in power ever again.
 
What is the easy anti-trust case against Facebook?
There’s probably a decently strong case that newspapers/news networks could argue against Facebook, based on the terms of the publishing partnership agreements news sites have to make with Facebook, which do tend to be in Facebook’s favor. It’s a minor one but seems to be a fairly easy anti-trust case.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.