I guess what I'm missing is why the average consumer would have such a strong desire to have a desktop computer take up a few less square inches of space. I agree with your hypothesis about iMac customers, but IMO, this is telling me they are buying based more on form than anything else.
I do like the looks of the new iMac. It's visually appealing. But at this point in time I'm not getting thinness for the sake of being thin. I don't see how this enhances performance, just aesthetics.
Ha. I am not "whining" about it but making a point. Keep spending your easy earned bucks on products you're suckered into buying the first place.
I think your point is super interesting and one I like thinking about. I'm a designer so I do for a living/passion. It's Apple's philosophy that form and function should be one, that where they meet there is purity and balance and beauty. Apple aims for the beauty provided by form meeting function. For example, a beautiful car has a beautiful form. And that form is functional in that its curves minimize wind resistance and help stabilize the car at high speeds, and so on. The form of a chair is functional in that it dictates how it conforms to your body and distributes weight when you sit on it. But some people don't care about the shape of a car or the shape of a chair so long as its cheap, or whatever. Some people take pride in being frugal or practical. Others in luxury and excess. I think Apple tries to straddle the middle in an attempt to find the perfect balance. There's no way every consumer is going to blindly agree that Apple hits that mark every time. You don't agree. You question. You're thinking. And I admire that and enjoy these types of conversations because you and I represent the challenge a business faces: who does Apple please?
I would argue that this update, the thinner version with sans DVD drive, isn't a good buy for you now but when your current computer kicks the bucket a few years from now the iMac will be more powerful and the lack of DVD may no longer be a concern. So then it may be an appealing machine, especially with Haswell chip and more powerful GPU.
But you're right this specific update wasn't much of an internal update. It's the direction that is so interesting. Computers are taking new forms (not just functions).
I'm really surprised that people are willing to buy the new iMac with NO DVD drive or Firewire!
I'm really surprised that people are willing to buy the new iMac with NO DVD drive or Firewire!
Maybe I'm missing something but doesn't the surge of new iMac purchase come from the fact that...ugh...a new iMac was released? I don't see any prove that people necessarily buy the new iMac because it is thinner/lighter. I'd say it is because people simply waited for the new refreshed iMac to show up...
By your logic, AiO should be selling en masse. They don't. So no: society as a whole doesn't really want lighter/thinner as a desktop.
You know: critical thinking and all that...
So, you think I should have to pay for a built-in DVD drive I'll never use, just so you don't have to spend a few bucks to buy one? I think not!
Just throwing these out there: http://www.isuppli.com/Home-and-Con...nal-Desktop-PCs-with-Double-Digit-Growth.aspx
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/computers/the-all-in-one-pc-is-alive-and-well/8099
Couldn't find anything that recent, but all-in-ones have been outpacing traditional desktop growth for a while now.
Were you also surprised when people still bought computers without 56k modems and floppy drives? Changes like these that Apple makes are what drive developments in supporting technology companies. Shedding the weight, expense, and clumsiness of old technologies from new machines is something that PC companies should have done long ago! You can buy a USB/Thunderbolt adaptor to connect yourselves to any of the antique-tech formats that you're emotionally not ready to let go of, and spare the rest of us and our machines from being burdened by an unnecessary need for the manufacture to accommodate backwards-compatibility to your short-sighted whine!
(May your complaining continue to fall on deaf-ears in Cupertino!)![]()
I'm sorry: both statistics include the iMac in their figure. Apple has virtually no discrete desktop computer (let not start arguing about the mini/pro), hence including iMac sales in such a figure will give you false results.
It's not really false result, it's more a lack of data. Desktop computers and all in ones aren't tracked that closely (especially if you want to exclude macs), but over the last couple years, significantly more all in ones have been put on the market. A simple visit to an electronics store will show that. The articles I linked were primarily focussed on Windows all-in-ones, I think it's foolish to simply ignore them because they also include the iMac. Like it or not, the iMac helps drive the Windows all-in-one market too, because there are people that like the iMac aesthetics but are unwilling to buy a Mac for whatever reason and there are plenty of vendors looking for a piece of the pie.
I'm surprised people still use DVD drives, I can count on one hand how many times I've used mine in the last 5 years.
Were you also surprised when people still bought computers without 56k modems and floppy drives? Changes like these that Apple makes are what drive developments in supporting technology companies. Shedding the weight, expense, and clumsiness of old technologies from new machines is something that PC companies should have done long ago! You can buy a USB/Thunderbolt adaptor to connect yourselves to any of the antique-tech formats that you're emotionally not ready to let go of, and spare the rest of us and our machines from being burdened by an unnecessary need for the manufacture to accommodate backwards-compatibility to your short-sighted whine!
(May your complaining continue to fall on deaf-ears in Cupertino!)![]()
I think mac's are the only computers increasing market share every quarter compared to everyone else.