Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Surely the politicians are aware that Apple has a major trial ahead of them. If they participated in the hearing, every question in the trial would start with “In the recent Senate hearing, you stated...”

Postpone the hearing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
Apple has decided not to testify in a U.S. Senate subcommittee hearing on antitrust issues related to mobile App Stores, and U.S. senators have called Apple's refusal "unacceptable," reports Reuters.
Honestly, I can't imagine anything more useless than another senate subcommittee on anything technical. Kudos to Apple for skipping the ********.
 
The only way this is in Apple's best interest to attend is if they think Congress is going to pass something that limits Apple's ability to make profits. They know that everyone is gunning for the App Store right now, but that is an uphill battle to say the least. Apple is not a monopoly in a true sense. You have choice. You can buy any cell phone you want.
 
I don't really see the point. Tim has participated in the past, but it was a colossal waste of time. I sincerely doubt anything will come out of this latest dog and pony show. Mostly its politicians trying to get some soundbites and appear to be doing something.

I'd rather see them take up privacy and give us something similar to GDPR.
 
Waste of time, why not spend this time on something else? Like looking into why ISPs charge an arm and a leg for a half assed internet connection.

AT&T, Verizon, Comcrap and the likes have been milking the American people with their regional monopolies over network for years and I haven't seen on private hearing with tangible laws released. Yes, the FCC and its Net Neutrality helps, to an extent.
100% this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blkant
I don't really see the point. Tim has participated in the past, but it was a colossal waste of time. I sincerely doubt anything will come out of this latest dog and pony show. Mostly its politicians trying to get some soundbites and appear to be doing something.

I'd rather see them take up privacy and give us something similar to GDPR.
that's all politicians does act like they're doing something
 
Tim Cook knows an utter waste of time when he sees one.
7a245f0bfd418dbe5cccd527998a744a.gif
 
As a CEO, I would not send anyone to testify in person in Washington DC. Newsflash: there is a deadly virus everywhere, and not everyone has been vaccinated yet. There are variance of the virus emerging. There are a lot of anti-trust actions the Senate needs to take, but I don’t really think Apple is one of them.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: EyeTack and DCINKC
Waste of time, why not spend this time on something else? Like looking into why ISPs charge an arm and a leg for a half assed internet connection.

AT&T, Verizon, Comcrap and the likes have been milking the American people with their regional monopolies over network for years and I haven't seen on private hearing with tangible laws released. Yes, the FCC and its Net Neutrality helps, to an extent.
Exactly, there's a real monopoly bilking us every day and they waste our time and money on this
 
The politicians use the public hearings to increase their general knowledge about tech things the don't want to spend time reading up on. I would not be surprised if they ask stupid how-to questions in such hearings. How do I get a widget. How do I turn off notifications. How do I buy a kindle book on iphone.
Last time they asked almost nothing but stupid questions of Sundar Pichai.
 
  • Like
Reactions: buddhistMonkey
Why is the Senate trying to influence an ongoing trial? I mean, they will get the answers to their questions (from the trial!). so the timing here is suspicious at best, imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lato
I don’t think many people remember how lame it was trying to add functionality to smart phones before the iPhone and the App Store. I used to buy really high end Nokia prior to iPhone and the world wasn’t really set up for software on phones.

Apple innovated with the App Store and in turn helped software developers innovate within iOS. From what I can see the advertising, legal and political industries are only making the World worse...
 
There is NO benefit to Apple participating.

And, there is NO real need for a Hearing.

ALL of the facts are known !

Congress just needs to move forward with the proposed New Laws !

BTW, "Public" Hearings with Congress participating are a known Waste of Time !

ALL most member of Congress want out of such Public Hearings is Ammo for their RE-election campaign TV commercials !

ONLY "Private" Hearings have ANY real chance of being productive !
Is it worth participating in a hearing when most of the people doing the questioning in these high-tech matters have no idea about technology in the first place? Even simple matters, for instance, that Facebook doesn't own Google.

I'm sure Google will have been invited to this hearing as well, most of the questions and answers will be the same across both.

This hearing is just a fishing trip, nothing more.
 
Only the U.S. seems to want to cripple its own companies that are successful. Make no mistake, crippling U.S. companies with new laws will not favor new US companies, they will merely favor existing foreign giants.

U.S companies does not have a cost advantage. The only thing that U.S government provides its companies is the U.S standard of living and H1B visas, which attracts talent from around the world. Every other advantage U.S companies have, the individual companies had to work hard to achieve. And now they want to cripple those few advantages these companies developed legally, by changing the law and making those illegal? It's sad that foreign companies are using US laws to break US companies. No other country would allow such a thing.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.