Here is my reason not to get a Chromebook, I don't want to be tied into using Google services. Because I don't want all my actions, on a computer, tracked by ONE COMPANY, Google, so it can be sold to advertisers.My friends asked me what laptop to get their daughter, a Mac or Windows? I said, frankly I don't care for the way either of them are going, why don't you look at a Chromebook. They got her one, it suits her needs and she loves it.
Despite the fact I have half a dozen Mac laptops (two are dead, I keep them for sentimental reasons), there's no reason one has to have a Mac. If I just needed e-mail, a word processor, a spreadsheet and a browser, I can't think of why I'd want to spend an extra $1000 or so.
Chromebook is not a real laptop. It's an overpriced toy that is essentially useless in the real world. Macbooks continue to dominate in the real laptop market segment with the world's most advanced operating system OS X.
Are they competitors to my i7 MacBook Pro?
They have their place and sell more units because they are cheaper than my i7 MBP (surprise surprise... mine has a 500gb SSD, 16GB RAM, an i7 and a dedicated GPU).
I'd prefer to see the raw number of sales. Have MBP/Air sales gone down or are they being compared with $200 POS cr@pt0ps with Atoms/Celerons and the lack of a rich OS (requiring an internet connection... fun fun).
Fandroids seem to have taken over these forums so I'm giving up on battling them. My point though... is an i7 laptop with OS X comparable to an Atom/Celeron based tablet requiring an internet connection that sits in a laptop case? I argue they are two different categories of machines and chromebooks should be in the sub-notebook category because their price/sales largely come down to their lack of grunt/features.
I really don't 'get' Chromebooks, they can't do anything a tablet (with keyboard) can't do.![]()
A question: Doesn't the Chromebook require wi-fi?
I realize that virtually every home has wi-fi while more and more public places have wi-fi access but it still limits it's use.
People must be buying chromebooks so their android tablet has some company in the bottom drawer
Chromebook is not a real laptop. It's an overpriced toy that is essentially useless in the real world. Macbooks continue to dominate in the real laptop market segment with the world's most advanced operating system OS X.
I've just realised what this article is...
Commercial sales to third party retailers... So wouldn't take into account online apple or Apple stores...!!!!
Of course it's not going to look that big! Why would you buy from a retailer rather than apple direct unless there was a biiig discount.
Chromebook is not a real laptop. It's an overpriced toy that is essentially useless in the real world. Macbooks continue to dominate in the real laptop market segment with the world's most advanced operating system OS X.
I never, NEVER get tired of this photo. Laughing hysterically as I type this
----------
Er, no. Sorry, fully disagree.
Just the other day I had to reinstall Windows 8 on my Bootcamp partition. And oddly because I'm using an upgrade license key, I always have to install Windows twice over to get it to activate properly. What ensued next was what seemed like an endless cycle of updating and restarting of over 75 updates, not including upgrading to Windows 8.1, which lasted nearly as long as reinstalling the entire OS. This whole ordeal of getting Windows back to working condition lasted me almost a day's worth of my time. Granted I was not in front of my computer the entire time but it easily equated to several hours.
Meanwhile, I can log in my Apple ID to the Mac App store and download and install the latest version of Mavericks (10.9.1) in one fell swoop in about half an hour. No licensee keys. No activation BS. I absolutely love it.
How inefficient and time consuming of an OS Windows is (in terms of upkeep) makes me loathe Windows with a fiery passion.
How many of these purchasers realised it didn't have Windows on it?
I'd prefer to see the raw number of sales. Have MBP/Air sales gone down or are they being compared with $200 POS cr@pt0ps with Atoms/Celerons and the lack of a rich OS (requiring an internet connection... fun fun).
It is really sad that there isn't a single PC OEM that can figure out the 5-6 simple rules used by Apple to build a good computer, and scale that down to $300-$800 territory. It is easily doable, but nobody is doing it.
No nonsensical touchscreen, just a good trackpad, good keyboard, decent screen, generous battery and pure SSD. It should be easy to build a $400 laptop with these rules, less powerful hardware than the Macbook Air but still plenty powerful for the common user.
But no, nobody understands it. So the PC industry deserves this.
Well it's better than Linux, FreeBSD if only because of available software, built in and third party. Personally I prefer osx as it's always more stable than windows, BUT, that is generally fault of third party software.
Time machine is still a great sell for me and has saved me on a number of occasions. Surprised there are no decent windows clones of it
----------
I've just realised what this article is...
Commercial sales to third party retailers... So wouldn't take into account online apple or Apple stores...!!!!
Of course it's not going to look that big! Why would you buy from a retailer rather than apple direct unless there was a biiig discount.
That's mathematically impossible!
I don't see why anyone would want a chrome book. Even the commercials don't show any useful features.
There is nothing exactly like Time Machine due to the fact that Time Machine relies on folder hard-linking. Most file systems have that feature disabled due to the high risk of file system corruption. OS X has strict rules on where folder hard links can be made because of this. An OS would have to have file system support for it, which won't likely happen if the OS manufacturer has no need for it, so third parties can't make anything like Time Machine either.
When it comes to which OS is more advanced though, I'd have to say that once you get deep into the world of OS X automation, you absolutely can't go back to any OS. It is hands-down the best platform for automation, and no third party software could ever hack Windows or Linux up enough to emulate it. I have around 5 AppleScripts I wrote and use daily, and couldn't do without.
I never, NEVER get tired of this photo. Laughing hysterically as I type this
----------
Er, no. Sorry, fully disagree.
Just the other day I had to reinstall Windows 8 on my Bootcamp partition. And oddly because I'm using an upgrade license key, I always have to install Windows twice over to get it to activate properly. What ensued next was what seemed like an endless cycle of updating and restarting of over 75 updates, not including upgrading to Windows 8.1, which lasted nearly as long as reinstalling the entire OS. This whole ordeal of getting Windows back to working condition lasted me almost a day's worth of my time. Granted I was not in front of my computer the entire time but it easily equated to several hours.
Meanwhile, I can log in my Apple ID to the Mac App store and download and install the latest version of Mavericks (10.9.1) in one fell swoop in about half an hour. No licensee keys. No activation BS. I absolutely love it.
How inefficient and time consuming of an OS Windows is (in terms of upkeep) makes me loathe Windows with a fiery passion.