Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

WalsallSaddler

macrumors member
Original poster
Am I the only one who thinks it looks really bad, like a screen defect or a burn-in effect?

A regular camera would have looked much more aesthetic.
 

Attachments

  • duo1.jpg
    duo1.jpg
    191.1 KB · Views: 1
  • duo2.jpg
    duo2.jpg
    99.9 KB · Views: 3
  • duo3.jpg
    duo3.jpg
    258.3 KB · Views: 1
  • duo4.jpg
    duo4.jpg
    152.7 KB · Views: 1
  • Haha
Reactions: slippery-pete
Having seen a friend's Android phone that has an under-display camera, I think that approach of having a not-totally-perfect screen over the camera is a better trade off than having a permanent black hole punch for the camera.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for pointing arrows at it, or I would not have seen it.
These screens are from a MacRumors video (because of copyright), so you can't really tell in some parts.

But in videos by other YouTubers, the under-display camera stands out even more and looks way worse (depends on the focus and viewing angle).
 
  • Like
Reactions: poppe
I’m less concerned about how it looks and more concerned about how it will perform. Several people that were at the event mentioned it being very low quality.
 
A thousand times better than a hole or island. It'll get better as the technology improves. It's mostly 'cos the screen is matte and the hole has to be unfettered.
 
Can you see where the camera is, in certain lighting conditions and at certain viewing angles? Undoubtably.

Will it really make a difference in viewing content and using the device? Time will tell.
 
looks fine in normal usage. i think apple did it right if you want to use that camera use your main camera and who uses this for anything but facetime really?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.