Newsflash: The United Kingdom and its government aren't in the E.U. anymore.Is the EU government just bored always going after Apple for nonsense?
Newsflash: The United Kingdom and its government aren't in the E.U. anymore.Is the EU government just bored always going after Apple for nonsense?
Have words lost all meaning? No one is forcing you to buy Apple products. No one is threatening bodily harm if you chose a Pixel or a Dell. So no, it's not extortion.Agreed
It's extortion
I’m happy the EU and others stick their nose in it. Let them also look into the RAM issue… why is Apple charging 4x more for the same RAM (Apple will likely get much cheaper than consumers) than consumers can buy them from the vendor? Same for SSD. This isn’t business, this is a forced rip off by Apple.
Good for you in your opinion but not everybody else agreesI’m happy the EU and others stick their nose in it. Let them also look into the RAM issue… why is Apple charging 4x more for the same RAM (Apple will likely get much cheaper than consumers) than consumers can buy them from the vendor? Same for SSD. This isn’t business, this is a forced rip off by Apple.
Have words lost all meaning? No one is forcing you to buy Apple products.
movies shot in IMAX need to be released in IMAX compatible theaters.No, because a filmmaker can distribute their movies elsewhere. Can't distribute iOS apps elsewhere.
Burgers aren't distributed in a duopoly.also, burger shops sell soft drinks for 10x more than it costs fyi. but I guess it's not run by Apple so that's ok to do?
Buying a smartphone isn't "purely optional".It boggles the mind that people can't seem to understand that buying Apple products is purely optional
The regulation, whether in the EU or the UK is about companies having monopoly power.Until the day Apple is considered a true monopoly in phone and/or computer business
geolocked. not user selectable.I do honestly wonder if you could sideload anywhere if you change your region to the EU.
Why should they?Not if you believe consoles should also allow alternative marketplaces. One step at a time.
There is no duopoly in the laptop business.Burgers aren't distributed in a duopoly.
You can in fact easily prepare your own burger at home.
Buying a smartphone isn't "purely optional".
And there's a choice of only two relevant (operating system) platforms in the marketplace.
The regulation, whether in the EU or the UK is about companies having monopoly power.
Monopoly power doesn't mean that they're literally the only company company in the market.
Wait until they find out how much luxury brands mark up their products.if a company charges 100000000000x for RAM, simply don't buy it.
also, burger shops sell soft drinks for 10x more than it costs fyi. but I guess it's not run by Apple so that's ok to do?
Much more than that. For example, they can check the Carrier that your phone hooks up to during activation and regular usage to determine the approx Location. Location services can also help. In addition, they can flag device serial numbers so that only devices sold in EU can be permitted to do side loading. Lots of different ways.Kind of like the Taiwanese flag and Chinese iPhones?
Words dont Have meaning unless people give them the meaning. I can point to a desk and call it a chair.Have words lost all meaning? No one is forcing you to buy Apple products. No one is threatening bodily harm if you chose a Pixel or a Dell. So no, it's not extortion.
It's a company charging what they think the market will bear. And it appears the market will bear those prices quite well.
So, ok. By that logic, supermarket chains can charge €150k for all 10kg of rice, $300k for 1kg of pasta, $9000 for a bottle of water And so on, then customer just don’t eat And drink?if a company charges 100000000000x for RAM, simply don't buy it.
also, burger shops sell soft drinks for 10x more than it costs fyi. but I guess it's not run by Apple so that's ok to do?
It’s also a Ridiculous fallacy to equate “monopoly” with “90%+ market share with no competitors whatsoever”. It’s such a narrow definition I’d argue. Maybe EU defines monopoly differently than in US or other jurisditions?100%
It boggles the mind that people can't seem to understand that buying Apple products is purely optional. There's Windows/Android. Until the day Apple is considered a true monopoly in phone and/or computer business, the whole idea that they are forcing customers to do anything is purely a fallacy. A ridiculous fallacy I might add.
Yes but they want it allThere is no duopoly in the laptop business.
You can build your own laptop at home. https://frame.work
Apple can absolutely charge 100000000000x for their ram options on the MacBook.
I said Apple products. Not Smartphone. Buying Apple products is absolutely, 100% "purely optional" and this is a cold hard fact you cannot deny.
And there's one that satisfies your RAM cost/sideloading/other complaints. That one has a larger global marketshare.
Windows/Android are great alternatives and people have much easier access to those products than Apple devices considering their global marketshare dwarves Apple's marketshare.
The sky is blue because we collectively agree the word is used that way in English.Words dont Have meaning unless people give them the meaning. I can point to a desk and call it a chair.
Put that aside, while it is true that no one is “physically threatening anyone” to buy Apple products or pixel or whatever, it still doesn’t change the fact that company holds enormous power and influence to sway and limit your options. I’d say that’s perfectly extortion.
So, ok. By that logic, supermarket chains can charge €150k for all 10kg of rice, $300k for 1kg of pasta, $9000 for a bottle of water And so on, then customer just don’t eat And drink?
It’s also a Ridiculous fallacy to equate “monopoly” with “90%+ market share with no competitors whatsoever”. It’s such a narrow definition I’d argue. Maybe EU defines monopoly differently than in US or other jurisditions?
Or, maybe there are millions of people cheering for companies and corporations to do whatever they feel like it, with no consequences whatsoever. I guess Apple is allowed to enter home market, furniture market, design market etc and since the competition is already there Apple should never be considered monopoly under any of those markets even if they charge 10x the competitor price for their “boutique” products.
…which is why it and its pricing aren’t regulated by regulators and/or law.There is no duopoly in the laptop business.
It isn’t so optional to buy either an Android or iOS phone.I said Apple products. Not Smartphone. Buying Apple products is absolutely, 100% "purely optional" and this is a cold hard fact you cannot deny.
Having just one that satisfies consumers or developers isn’t “choice”. There’s a lack of choice - especially given how both are tacitly colluding to offer very similar store/commission models.And there's one that satisfies your RAM cost/sideloading/other complaints. That one has a larger global marketshare.
Global market share doesn’t really matter to local lawmakers and regulators.Windows/Android are great alternatives and people have much easier access to those products than Apple devices considering their global marketshare dwarves Apple's marketshare.
Yep, absolutely. Super Apple Grocers can run amazing ads and say how they reinvented rice and pasta and how their bottle of the water is the purest of all.So, ok. By that logic, supermarket chains can charge €150k for all 10kg of rice, $300k for 1kg of pasta, $9000 for a bottle of water
🤦♂️ and? you joined in on the conversation about the issue with Apple's RAM pricing with MacBooks (I was responding to "why is Apple charging 4x more for the same RAM (Apple will likely get much cheaper than consumers) than consumers can buy them from the vendor?"). It sounds like you agree with me that this RAM pricing should not be regulated, so case closed.…which is why it and its pricing aren’t regulated by regulators and/or law.
Tangential at best to this thread.you joined in on the conversation about the issue with Apple's RAM pricing with MacBook
No, they’re going after companies that misbehave and misuse their power to get even richer on behalf of the consumer.Is the EU government just bored always going after Apple for nonsense? Lmao
Because you don’t have a choice. Buy Apple’s extremely expensive RAM/SSD or get a computer that isn’t future proof. Since all is soldered on the board… you have no choice.In what possible world is Apple's pricing of RAM and SSD upgrades an antitrust concern?!?!?! Even the staunchest DMA defenders on MacRumors concede there is significant competition in the hardware market.
I didn’t know this was happening. Gross.I imagine the decision to close the investigations and reopen them later is to avoid any issues with the investigations having started under different legal circumstances. The CMA seems to now have more options available to it that may allow for the new investigations to have a wider scope, so it may be that they want to re-examine the facts of the case based on the new powers.
Honestly, I can only see this as being a positive for consumers. I don't care if Apple loses some of it's precious BILLIONS in App Store revenue because they might not get 30% of every sale of something that happens on an iPhone. The fact they're even going after platforms like Patreon, who themselves only take an 8% cut of the proceeds, shows it's nothing but sheer bloody avarice at this point. They have no part in the entire process, other than the initial app download. They don't host content for Patreon, they didn't process payments for Patreon until they decided to force Patreon into using their payment system. They're just muscling in on the transaction because nothing but governmental intervention can stop them from doing so.
The sooner all consumers can have the option to use a 3rd-party store on iOS, the better.
Of course they do. If situations become abusive it requires new laws.my favorite part is how they investigated. Then went well not this time so we will change the law so we can get them next time. I would even believe what was found in this investigation influenced the new law.
governments are just like corporations and change laws, rules, and regulations to suit the situation.
must make you sick to the core knowing some low paid, horrendous hours per week person in China is making all the tech (any brand) that you use...I didn’t know this was happening. Gross.
I wish I didn’t like apple products so much. The company itself makes me ill.