Tea-break.So, where were they during British Leyland?
Tea-break.So, where were they during British Leyland?
You got that the wrong way round.
Apple protecting the environment is not an effective strategy against committees that want environmental virtue signalling.
I beg to differ, this section clearly shows the problem and solutions:The report is junk science and useful only as toilet paper.
When computers and other devices move towards system on chips, unibody designs and no moving parts they are easier to recycle and result in less e-waste.
Most of the electronic e-waste in history comes from devices with moving parts and many points of failure. Components like memory sticks, big dusty fans and dead PCIE cards that are out of date so they get chucked out and end up in landfills and our oceans.
The only downside from SoC is ‘right to repair’, but it becomes impossible to repair devices that are moving towards less components and easier recycling. So it’s a useless argument to make.
This is satire right? LOL. 1800's? Blacksmiths? 6 inch tubes?That idea is badly outdated. It’s not the 1800’s. You’re not going to get a blacksmith to pound a new blade for your iPad when it fractures. Maybe in the distant future where we all print out chips on personal silicon printers or something, but electronics are no longer focused on large components that can be swapped out. It’s impossible to create an iphone if you want the local handy man to be able to rebuild it. It’s precision manufacturing and integrated subtle electronic components. I don’t like the throw away culture capitalism encourages from manufacturing but I also don’t want electronics to be stuck in 1950 so uncle Jerry can replace the 6 inch tubes. Add to this concerns about security, the complicated nature of networked devices to know more about you than any tech in history and I think there’s reasons for a nuanced look at exactly what we mean but ‘self repair’ etc. Buying a used phone where the local geek puts his own chips in that ‘work fine’ but also send all your personal data to his cloud service every night isn’t a positive direction.
Shhh, you’ll scare him/her.Well we did create ARM. And the WWW. And the Computer.
One area in which this report is 100%, devices should be easier to repair than they are now. Apple is in fact making their products harder to repair.
Absolutely. Like the SoC on the new Macs.There may come a time when the innards of an iPhone will mostly be a battery and a monolithic piece of custom silicon. Smaller, lighter, faster, better, more reliable... but quite impossible to repair.
Now do AirPods.iFixIt score the iPhone 12 6/10 for repairability
This is true, but Apple balances that by offering replacement rather than repair for a significant portion of their warranted products. The benefit to the customer is immediate resolution rather than waiting for a repair.
But Apple does not then just toss the defective product in the dust-bin, but sends it back for formal repair (where the longer repair time is not an issue) or reclamation of usable components and recycling of non-reclaimable components.
Straw man....?They offer trade in, recycle and refurb devices...?
lmao, I have a bridge to sell you if you believe that. They make them hard to repair because it fundamentally stimulates device turnover.Yes, many of the things Apple does is just "how it has become" with every electronics manufacturer. But Apple takes many specific steps to prevent repairs for absolutely no good reason.
Certainly we can make things worse by shoddy construction. On the other hand, "things that last a lifetime" is a category that includes, what? Furniture, dishes, and houses? Clothing doesn't last a lifetime, and didn't back in her day either, which is why women needed to be able to sew and many had to make their own clothes. Even if a computer lasted a lifetime, it wouldn't have been useful for a lifetime. The best thing you can do for a technological device is to make it recyclable.It’s not just a problem with Apple, or electronics. So many things are simply not meant to last. Cheap products from China and all sorts of products under the sun are just made to last as short a time as possible before being useless. My grandmother had things that lasted a lifetime
I sell these MTs bulk for around $170-200 ea depending on specs and condition. These machines are usually no more than 3-3 1/2 years old. A used Mac Mini from 2014 averages around the same price BUT comes with lower specs and and have little to no upgradability and a higher power consumption. These MTs use 65W while all Minis are either 85 or 150W.Its great and all but we can't stifle innovation and increase power consumption just on the off chance the 1% of buyers will want to swap the RAM or SSD out. The new Mac mini consumes very little power and performs very well, replacing tens of millions of PCs with these Mac minis or similar low power devises would result in a significant reductions in power draw.
Keeping an old PC running isn't always great in the long run.
“Apple glues and solders parts together on their laptops”
My biggest complaint regarding Apple products since Tim Cook became the CEO.
Not to mention tying parts like screen and battery to the motherboard. On older devices, they push that as much as they can with little evil things here and there, like blocking third party ambient light sensor and blocking the battery health status.
These little things are there just to undermine your will to repair your phone. If you really want to, pay a premium repairing with Apple.
Reuse is more important than recycling. Recycling isn’t free, it still requires energy and resources to do. Making products last as long as possible helps the environment a lot more. And making them upgradable and easy to repair helps that causeThey offer trade in, recycle and refurb devices...?
Try and install "Big Sur" on that 2012 mini.
Correct, but your 2014 MBP doesn't have half as many of the glued and soldered parts that the new ones have. And a pre-2012 model has even less glued/soldered parts. Each generation is worse and worse for repairability. And it's deliberate, because it is more profitable, because it makes repairs cost a lot more, so people throw away the old one instead of fixing it, and go and buy a new one. Which is unnecessarily damaging to the environment. That's the problem.Their product last for ages. My 2014 MBP still runs completely fine (besides the depleted battery) and iPhones probably have the longest OS update support in the industry.
What is true that their products are hard to repair, part of it is because of more compact design, tightening tolerances and waterproof-ness. But to my knowledge if you go to an Apple Store and they have to exchange parts / computers, the exchanged product gets recycles.
They could clearly build their products to be more repairable or modular, but then product quality would suffer. It's very clear they are prioritising product quality and do what they can do to mitigate the negative effects of bad repairability.
Wow, that's amazing, thanks for sharing.I work in a small corporate e-waste facility doing sales and IT, most of our customers are data centers and offices where IT equipment is used and abused. That being said nothing brings more joy to me than swapping a bad ram module or SSD on a HP, Dell, Lenovo etc and bringing a system back to life. Once its refurbished I sell it and it can most likely last years to come thanks to Windows 10 officially supporting most hardware circa 2008ish.
One of the pieces of equipment we get frequently are the HP ProDesk/EliteDesk Mini Series. I consider these to be the HP equivalent to a Mac Mini but unlike the Mac Mini is 100% repairable by the end user with 1x NVMe, 1x 2.5 inch, socketed CPU, etc.
Oh and unlike Apple, HP has created numerous guides on how to properly repair your hardware.