Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You got that the wrong way round.

Apple protecting the environment is not an effective strategy against committees that want environmental virtue signalling.

Just quickly went through the CVs of some of the committee members. They're lawyers and PPE graduates in the main. I found one scientist. So asking them to appreciate design and product strategies is beyond them.
 
The report is junk science and useful only as toilet paper.

When computers and other devices move towards system on chips, unibody designs and no moving parts they are easier to recycle and result in less e-waste.

Most of the electronic e-waste in history comes from devices with moving parts and many points of failure. Components like memory sticks, big dusty fans and dead PCIE cards that are out of date so they get chucked out and end up in landfills and our oceans.

The only downside from SoC is ‘right to repair’, but it becomes impossible to repair devices that are moving towards less components and easier recycling. So it’s a useless argument to make.
I beg to differ, this section clearly shows the problem and solutions:


br,
bona fides: senior member IEEE, 25 years of HW design experience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peter2
That idea is badly outdated. It’s not the 1800’s. You’re not going to get a blacksmith to pound a new blade for your iPad when it fractures. Maybe in the distant future where we all print out chips on personal silicon printers or something, but electronics are no longer focused on large components that can be swapped out. It’s impossible to create an iphone if you want the local handy man to be able to rebuild it. It’s precision manufacturing and integrated subtle electronic components. I don’t like the throw away culture capitalism encourages from manufacturing but I also don’t want electronics to be stuck in 1950 so uncle Jerry can replace the 6 inch tubes. Add to this concerns about security, the complicated nature of networked devices to know more about you than any tech in history and I think there’s reasons for a nuanced look at exactly what we mean but ‘self repair’ etc. Buying a used phone where the local geek puts his own chips in that ‘work fine’ but also send all your personal data to his cloud service every night isn’t a positive direction.
This is satire right? LOL. 1800's? Blacksmiths? 6 inch tubes?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
Two points I'd like to share:

1. Apple or Tech industry in general is not alone to blame, they produce, we buy and consume, so it's a circle. When people become really more conscious and outspoken about the environmental waste, the tech will be forced to follow. Obviously we as a whole are very split on almost every important matter, so they use our indecisiveness to their advantage to milk the situation as they like. If you want change, don't buy things that you know how affect the environment. If you need options (as many said about Apple not giving much repair options), demand them, ask for it, make what really matters on the table.

2. Regarding Apple specifically, they're so cheesy on PR and promoting the products, but what goes behind or afterwards is a whole another story. In every corner or step they want to be monopolist, which is far from alarming. Because of us being not very conscious buyers, they just make billions of it. And yes it's gone too far where they set all the rules without us saying anything, just following. I give them credit for being able to dictate the tech industry right now and be an example but for all wrong reasons.. overpriced products on affordable parts, manufactured in China, introducing new iPhone without charger and at the same time bringing two or three more products (like MagSafe) which contradict their environmental claims and goals and producing even more waste at the end.. charging crazy amount for repair and not supporting good line of parts, limited places for repair.. everything is so controlled and calculated just in the name of money. Our money, yours and mine, gained by struggles and many sacrifices. Apple inspire all other tech companies to adopt such business strategies and at the end we end up scratching our heads how this and that happened to us, to Earth, to anything.. It all started with us, our own personal choice in the beginning. Everything else is just result of this cycle. We're the buyers, we set the market, our demands, our needs. They only produce it. It starts with us.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
One area in which this report is 100%, devices should be easier to repair than they are now. Apple is in fact making their products harder to repair.

There may come a time when the innards of an iPhone will mostly be a battery and a monolithic piece of custom silicon. Smaller, lighter, faster, better, more reliable... but quite impossible to repair.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob_DM and Stella
There may come a time when the innards of an iPhone will mostly be a battery and a monolithic piece of custom silicon. Smaller, lighter, faster, better, more reliable... but quite impossible to repair.
Absolutely. Like the SoC on the new Macs.

However, if countries were brave enough to pass 'right to repair' bills, instead of siding with tech companies such has Apple, this would encourage innovation to enable easy to repair devices.
 
“Apple glues and solders parts together on their laptops”

My biggest complaint regarding Apple products since Tim Cook became the CEO.

Not to mention tying parts like screen and battery to the motherboard. On older devices, they push that as much as they can with little evil things here and there, like blocking third party ambient light sensor and blocking the battery health status.

These little things are there just to undermine your will to repair your phone. If you really want to, pay a premium repairing with Apple.
 
The UK Environmental Committee does have some valid points. I would love to be able to get the batteries in my AirPods replaced for a reasonable price, but I can get a brand new pair on sale for less than what Apple charges for battery replacement.
 
This is true, but Apple balances that by offering replacement rather than repair for a significant portion of their warranted products. The benefit to the customer is immediate resolution rather than waiting for a repair.

But Apple does not then just toss the defective product in the dust-bin, but sends it back for formal repair (where the longer repair time is not an issue) or reclamation of usable components and recycling of non-reclaimable components.

Some items like AirPods, HomePod, power adapters, cables, dongles, etc are not repaired but recycled. Remember that recycling is not fully green either. it takes energy to process and recycle components. I love my AirPods Pro even after having them replaced, but Apple cuts the stem off of them and sends them to a recycling facility where energy is spent to recycle them.

Look at how software updates rendered the iPhone 3G and iPhone 4 nearly unusable. That being said plenty of Apple products last a long time. I have a 5th gen iPod Video, iPod HiFi, Mac Pro 5,1 (3) 30” Apple Cinema Displays, 3rd gen iPod Nano. Unfortunately once Apple stops supporting devices that require internet connectivit, the hardware can be working fine, but it’s useless. My 2007 1st gen Apple TV can no longer access the iTunes Store since Apple changed security certificates. Same problem with my original iPhone. Can’t access YouTube or the weather app on those since Apple won’t release an update with proper supported security certificates. My 3rd gen Apple TV barely works anymore since Apple’s updates slowed it down. I’m sure in 10 years or so, the original HomePod won’t be able to access Apple Music, hopefully it can still be used as an AirPlay speaker since thats what I use mine for.
 

Attachments

  • AD6B0950-D11A-4D95-8BC5-04C0A37A39BC.jpeg
    AD6B0950-D11A-4D95-8BC5-04C0A37A39BC.jpeg
    197.9 KB · Views: 105
Last edited:
Yes, many of the things Apple does is just "how it has become" with every electronics manufacturer. But Apple takes many specific steps to prevent repairs for absolutely no good reason.
lmao, I have a bridge to sell you if you believe that. They make them hard to repair because it fundamentally stimulates device turnover.
 
It’s not just a problem with Apple, or electronics. So many things are simply not meant to last. Cheap products from China and all sorts of products under the sun are just made to last as short a time as possible before being useless. My grandmother had things that lasted a lifetime
Certainly we can make things worse by shoddy construction. On the other hand, "things that last a lifetime" is a category that includes, what? Furniture, dishes, and houses? Clothing doesn't last a lifetime, and didn't back in her day either, which is why women needed to be able to sew and many had to make their own clothes. Even if a computer lasted a lifetime, it wouldn't have been useful for a lifetime. The best thing you can do for a technological device is to make it recyclable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bob_DM
Its great and all but we can't stifle innovation and increase power consumption just on the off chance the 1% of buyers will want to swap the RAM or SSD out. The new Mac mini consumes very little power and performs very well, replacing tens of millions of PCs with these Mac minis or similar low power devises would result in a significant reductions in power draw.

Keeping an old PC running isn't always great in the long run.
I sell these MTs bulk for around $170-200 ea depending on specs and condition. These machines are usually no more than 3-3 1/2 years old. A used Mac Mini from 2014 averages around the same price BUT comes with lower specs and and have little to no upgradability and a higher power consumption. These MTs use 65W while all Minis are either 85 or 150W.

You're actually using MORE power on a Mini than these fairly common PC counterparts from HP, Dell, and Lenovo.
 
Apple has made great strides in making much of the components in their products recyclable, and less toxic to the environment. Kudos for that. Having said that, they are increasingly turning their products into appliances - especially their "Pro" computers. I have an otherwise healthy 2016 15" MBP with a corrupt internal SSD. It's not worth it to me to pay for a replacement motherboard just to have a machine that I can operate without connecting an external boot drive just to use it. Saying nothing about how prone to wear the TB3 connectors are so that if I DO move it, the boot drive is extremely likely to become disconnected and hang the system. The trade offs are that with a fully integrated SOC like the M1, you get efficiency and speed gains. I've learnt the hard way to ALWAYS pay for AppleCare.
No magic bullet here, but at least Apple is trying to be more environmentally aware that it's competitors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
“Apple glues and solders parts together on their laptops”

My biggest complaint regarding Apple products since Tim Cook became the CEO.

Not to mention tying parts like screen and battery to the motherboard. On older devices, they push that as much as they can with little evil things here and there, like blocking third party ambient light sensor and blocking the battery health status.

These little things are there just to undermine your will to repair your phone. If you really want to, pay a premium repairing with Apple.

I remember opening the lid on my 1993 Performa 476 without tools, adding a 32 MB RAM module, since the other 4 MB module was soldered to the motherboard, and I replaced the 68LC040 with a 68040, all in less than 20 minutes.

PowerMac models were slightly more difficult and the various PowerBooks were okay, but the Wall Street model was rather a pain, and I just gave it away.
 
They offer trade in, recycle and refurb devices...?
Reuse is more important than recycling. Recycling isn’t free, it still requires energy and resources to do. Making products last as long as possible helps the environment a lot more. And making them upgradable and easy to repair helps that cause
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: freedomlinux
I do not believe they are intetionally creating devices difficult to repair in order to sell more. They are giving priority to slimness, quality, lightness which in turn makes the product difficult to repair or upgrade.

actually apple products works longer than those hp or dell plastics company. I will never a buy a plastic from hp or dell or samsung.
 
Their product last for ages. My 2014 MBP still runs completely fine (besides the depleted battery) and iPhones probably have the longest OS update support in the industry.

What is true that their products are hard to repair, part of it is because of more compact design, tightening tolerances and waterproof-ness. But to my knowledge if you go to an Apple Store and they have to exchange parts / computers, the exchanged product gets recycles.

They could clearly build their products to be more repairable or modular, but then product quality would suffer. It's very clear they are prioritising product quality and do what they can do to mitigate the negative effects of bad repairability.
Correct, but your 2014 MBP doesn't have half as many of the glued and soldered parts that the new ones have. And a pre-2012 model has even less glued/soldered parts. Each generation is worse and worse for repairability. And it's deliberate, because it is more profitable, because it makes repairs cost a lot more, so people throw away the old one instead of fixing it, and go and buy a new one. Which is unnecessarily damaging to the environment. That's the problem.
 
I work in a small corporate e-waste facility doing sales and IT, most of our customers are data centers and offices where IT equipment is used and abused. That being said nothing brings more joy to me than swapping a bad ram module or SSD on a HP, Dell, Lenovo etc and bringing a system back to life. Once its refurbished I sell it and it can most likely last years to come thanks to Windows 10 officially supporting most hardware circa 2008ish.

One of the pieces of equipment we get frequently are the HP ProDesk/EliteDesk Mini Series. I consider these to be the HP equivalent to a Mac Mini but unlike the Mac Mini is 100% repairable by the end user with 1x NVMe, 1x 2.5 inch, socketed CPU, etc.

Oh and unlike Apple, HP has created numerous guides on how to properly repair your hardware.

Wow, that's amazing, thanks for sharing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peter2
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.