winner, winner, chicken dinner!View attachment 2063331I have Syncreon tracking link on Apple order
winner, winner, chicken dinner!View attachment 2063331I have Syncreon tracking link on Apple order
Looks like you win, you’re Tim Cook’s favourite.
This is why I have Virgin as my mobile supplier, the tariff is a separate contract to the phone payments and the RPI only applies to the tariff, my £7 tariff only went up about 70pence instead of about £4 if the tariff and phone was the same contract.In-contract price upgrades are a massive bugbear of mine. I can't think of anywhere else where you sign up to an agreement, whereby the supplier is legally allowed to increase the cost by an unknown amount. I would never, ever, sign up to a contract like that in my professional life.
The fact that it's CPI/RPI + 3.9% which this year is going to be in the region of 14% is pretty grim too.
When networks first starting doing this it wasn't actually formally stated in the contract, as it is now, so I took it to CIFAS arbitration ... and lost. My case was that, by changing the terms of the contract, I had a right to withdrawal. This was especially true as they used RPI as the measure of inflation rather than CPI, which is generally a little bit lower. Even government departments had stopped using RPI as the 'true' measure of inflation by that point.
Boggles the mind that a 14 Pro 128GB, with a modest 25GB/month data allowance is £71/month today but would be around £87/month by the end of the contract, depending on inflation rates. And that brings to me to my final point. It's *somewhat* understandable that the carrier wants to charge you for increased the cost of their service, taking inflation into account. It's quite another thing to charge you RPI/CPI+3.9% for the portion of the contract that is actually paying for the phone. That's just a licence to print cash.
In-contract price upgrades are a massive bugbear of mine. I can't think of anywhere else where you sign up to an agreement, whereby the supplier is legally allowed to increase the cost by an unknown amount. I would never, ever, sign up to a contract like that in my professional life.
The fact that it's CPI/RPI + 3.9% which this year is going to be in the region of 14% is pretty grim too.
When networks first starting doing this it wasn't actually formally stated in the contract, as it is now, so I took it to CIFAS arbitration ... and lost. My case was that, by changing the terms of the contract, I had a right to withdrawal. This was especially true as they used RPI as the measure of inflation rather than CPI, which is generally a little bit lower. Even government departments had stopped using RPI as the 'true' measure of inflation by that point.
Boggles the mind that a 14 Pro 128GB, with a modest 25GB/month data allowance is £71/month today but would be around £87/month by the end of the contract, depending on inflation rates. And that brings to me to my final point. It's *somewhat* understandable that the carrier wants to charge you for increased the cost of their service, taking inflation into account. It's quite another thing to charge you RPI/CPI+3.9% for the portion of the contract that is actually paying for the phone. That's just a licence to print cash.
The memories! even had a HMV card.
My AppleCare+ with Theft and Loss Proof of Coverage just arrived, so I’m guessing my phone is about to despatch!
View attachment 2063343
Sitting here likeDISPATCH NOTIFICATION FROM APPLE![]()
![]()
Can always pop in Wimpy for a snack after collection
A wimpy just opened near where I work.![]()
Yeah Birmingham has 2 branches still open