"Apple has 21 days in which to appeal the ruling."
Now if Apple wants to appeal the ruling, they'll have to argue that the Samsung tablet is "as cool" as the iPad.
IIRC, it's been over 20 years already since one of the earliest genuine computer system hackers to get caught and prosecuted pleaded not guilty on the grounds that he was already an addicted geek/hacker by the time the govt passed the relevant computer mis-use laws arguing that he was unable to subsequently control himself. He won, but his friends had already pleaded guilty and did time. Apparently, the young Brits were also barred from ever physically entering the US![]()
Not sure how the coolness of a product has any effect on the law, but I'm not a judge.
The argument they are likely to use is that the judge pulled apart the various design elements to seek prior art on each element rather than the totality or how Apple applied the elements. Say like the 'frame' around the screen. Yes basically every tablet style device has that frame but before Apple was it flat and under the glass or some other style.
Too funny, especially coming from a U.K. judge.
I'm surprised the judges here know what an iPad is, or a Mac, or any computer in fact... we always think of them as dusty old farts, mumbling about something irrelevant and banging a gavel with a black cap on...
In related news: Judges teenage son cringes at fathers use of dated slang.
the word 'cool' is outdated?
Check out this link to see how far the Samsung copying has gone
http://www.tuaw.com/2011/09/28/no-comment-proof-that-samsung-shamelessly-copies-apple/
Thanks for the post.
I was thinking the same thing, but I was too chicken to question the statement being an old fart and generally out of it.
Cool post!!!![]()