Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,560
30,891


A group of UK network operators have formally urged the UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) to regulate iCloud Private Relay, claiming that Apple's privacy service is anti-competitive, potentially bad for users, and a threat to national security.

iCloud-General-Feature.jpg

In its response to the CMA's Interim Report on mobile ecosystems, Mobile UK, a trade association of British mobile network operators, including EE, Virgin Media O2, Three and Vodafone, has raised concerns that iCloud Private Relay can have a negative impact on user experience, internet safety, and competition.

‌iCloud‌ Private Relay was new service introduced with iOS 15 that ensures all traffic leaving an ‌iPhone‌, ‌iPad‌, or Mac is encrypted using two separate internet relays, so that companies cannot use personal information like IP address, location, and browsing activity to create a detailed profile about users.

Following a formal complaint about Private Relay from Microsoft, Mobile UK claims that the privacy service can have undesired side-effects for users: "Private Relay affects Apple users in many ways, beyond simply what level of privacy a user wants." For example, "Apple users have suffered a worse browsing experience when using Private Relay." This is alleged to have the potential to push users to "migrate" away from "the Safari browser to apps downloaded from the App Store where Apple can earn a commission."

Private Relay prevents network providers from seeing the network traffic from Safari and unencrypted applications. In preventing network operators from seeing this traffic, Mobile UK says that Private Relay prevents service providers from understanding "demand patterns across mobile networks," inhibiting their ability to effectively diagnose customer issues.

Moreover, Private Relay is alleged to compromise "content filtering, malware, anti-scamming and phishing protection provided by network providers." Mobile UK also claims that Private Relay is a threat to national security, since it "impairs the insights available under the Government's investigatory powers, with implication for law enforcement" with regards to "terrorism, serious organized crime, child sexual abuse, and exploitation."

Private Relay purportedly allows Apple "to leverage its considerable market power into many areas of the market and thus being able to further entrench its position." Mobile UK says that due to Private Relay, "providers will be unable to use the traffic data to develop their own competing mobile browsers in the future," as well as other services that directly compete with Apple:
Network providers would no longer be able to use web traffic data over Safari to develop their own digital products and services that complete directly with Apple. For example, a network provider may no longer have access to information about a user's content viewing habits to develop their own content that competes with Apple TV. Similarly, a network provider may no longer be able to share consumer insight with third parties that provide digital advertizing services in competition with Apple Search Ads...

Mobile UK asserts that the ability of UK Internet Service Providers (ISPs) "to differentiate and compete in the market on fair terms" is actively undermined by Private Relay since Apple is effectively becoming an ISP itself:

Apple unilaterally terminates the role of the mobile and fixed connectivity provider in resolving the internet connection, with Apple itself taking over the role of the ISP. The mobile and fixed connectivity provider's role is reduced to providing conveyance from the handset/home to the Apple iCloud platform.

Mobile UK is concerned that "Apple could thus leverage its position in the device and operating system to grow its iCloud+ user based to develop its position as an ISP."

Moreover, the trade association said that Private Relay directs users to more Apple services, "accessing the internet in a manner curated by Apple." Private Relay enables Apple "to favor its own proprietary applications and service, at the expense of other providers."

Mobile UK also said that Private Relay "affects competition in mobile browsers," highlighting that "rival browsers cannot differentiate themselves easily" as a result of Apple's WebKit browser engine restriction. The organization complains that users cannot "switch to an alternative browser" to skirt Private Relay since "the ability of rival browser to differentiate themselves from Safari will still be limited by the terms of Apple's browser engine."

In conclusion, the trade association says that Private Relay must be regulated beyond its superficial existence as a privacy service:

Mobile UK is very concerned that consumers are not fully informed about how Private Relay works or that they understand the full implications of invoking the services...

[...]

The impact of Private Relay is therefore multi-dimensional and cannot be assessed solely through a privacy lens.

Mobile UK urged the CMA to implement "a remedy that limits the use of Private Relay," or "at the very least" prevent "Apple from making Private Relay a default-on service." The complaint noted that "Private relay is currently default-off but it is already being used by a significant portion of Apple customers in the UK, despite being in beta mode."

Private Relay should not be presented as a set up option or installed as an on-default service. It should be made available as an app with others can compete with similar services such as VPNs. Apple should notify relevant third parties in advance of introducing Private Relay services, so that third parties can inform their customers of how their service may change were Private Relay to be used. For example, advance warning of the introduction of Private Relay would have allowed network providers to inform customers how their security solutions may change and also inform Government how it changes their investigatory powers insight from network traffic data.

For more information, see Mobile UK's full submission to the CMA. iCloud Private Relay has come under similar skepticism in the European Union, where major mobile operators sought the banning of Private Relay for infringing upon EU "digital sovereignty."

Earlier this week, Apple aggressively defended its ecosystem in its detailed response to the CMA. It said that the regulator had set the benefits of Apple's ecosystem aside "without reasoned basis, either ignoring them entirely or dismissing them on the basis of nothing more than speculation." Apple alleged that the CMA's Interim Report was based on "unsubstantiated allegations and hypothetical concerns raised primarily by self-serving complaints" from a handful of multi-billion dollar companies, "all seeking to make deep changes to the iPhone for their own commercial gain, without independent verification."

Article Link: UK Network Operators Target iCloud Private Relay in Complaint to Regulator
 
Last edited:

Marbles1

macrumors 6502a
Nov 27, 2011
512
2,712
Hilarious. Forget the iCloud relay - I wonder what 'Mobile UK' think of VPNs?

Surely just a matter of time before traffic-hiding software becomes standard for everyone. Definitely been a huge increase.

And I don't believe the standard 'terrorists / pedos' argument - it's about competition.
 

tmoerel

Suspended
Jan 24, 2008
1,005
1,567
Sorry mobile providers but all I want from you is a connection to the internet and my data being transported.
I DO NOT want you to mine my data.
I DO NOT want you to send me ads.
I DO NOT want you to sell my data to third parties.
I DO NOT want you to build a profile on me.
So please Apple, continue what you do and tell those self serving operators to get......
 

Danfango

macrumors 65816
Jan 4, 2022
1,294
5,777
London, UK
These ISPs are members of the ISPA which is a government controlled puppet behind the scenes and general source of asshattery. I suspect Mobile UK are a similar lobbying post. They are not worried about these issues, they are worried about them not being able to inspect traffic as will be required by some authoritarian government now and in the future.

People would be good to dump these terrible ISPs and move to Zen or Andrews and Arnold who take an approach to this issue of telling governments to go and piss up a rope.

This is an absolutely wonderful recommendation that you should be using iCloud Private Relay. Nothing else.

More typical shenanigans from this sack of dicks: ISPA nominated Mozilla as Internet Villain award because they implemented DNS over HTTP so the ISPs couldn't snoop your DNS traffic: https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.p...illain-category-over-mozilla-doh-fallout.html
 

Riku45100

macrumors newbie
Nov 9, 2021
3
23
A group of companies whining again, all the operators care about is upwelling you something and then delivery nothing that is worth it, also the want your data to sell to another company, this is all about profit and the profit they are losing, Facebook all over again, what’s next.
 

houttbe

macrumors member
Jul 18, 2002
69
60
Brussels, Belgium
This is shameful and cynical lobbying dressing up in a convoluted manner as public interest. Apple is differentiating itself as more privacy minded than the majority of grossly commercial operators who try to scrape a seedy living from duplicitous advertising and reselling of private information. Please Apple continue as you are doing. I’m happy to pay extra for some peace of mind.
 

bwillwall

Suspended
Dec 24, 2009
1,031
802
Outrageous, yet totally predictable. No, we're not gonna listen to your smears about how this is somehow designed to make people buy 3rd party browsers on the app store. Who pays money for a browser? Is that really the best they can come up with?
 

LV426

macrumors 68000
Jan 22, 2013
1,836
2,266
I have more than two brain cells to rub together, hence the ability to see these nonsensical arguments for what they are. My alleged ”worse browsing experience“ is my choice and factually incorrect. A trivial iCloud setting shields my data from their intrusive surveillance, thanks very much.

The danger here is that the U.K. government is perfectly capable of doublethink, and will regulate away my freedoms regardless of logic.

Use of Private Relay is my choice, not yours.
 

d686546s

macrumors 6502a
Jan 11, 2021
650
1,588
So please Apple, continue what you do and tell those self serving operators to get......

I agree with you, but I've never understood why people are surprised that operators are "self-serving." Do you/we actually think Apple is anything but?

Apple is not a knight in shining armour. It is very much using all of its leverage to get you deeper into its ecosystem to spend more money on Apple hardware and services and less on competitors'.

The question is -- and always was -- where is the line? I'm not convinced that Apple has crossed it, at least not consistently, but that doesn't mean that in all of these complaints Apple is always the good guy. Apple has built wonderful things that have improved our lives, but it can also be a nasty bully.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.