Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
68,106
38,858


The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) on Wednesday issued its final verdict on the state of the country's mobile browser market, and the regulator has concluded that Apple's policies are largely responsible for hampering competition and innovation.

app-store-blue-banner-uk-fixed.jpg

The CMA's independent inquiry group's investigation found that Apple's requirement for all iOS browsers to use its WebKit engine is stifling competition, and effectively prevents rival browsers from introducing unique features or optimizations on iPhones and iPads, regardless of their capabilities on other platforms.

The full report outlines several problematic Apple practices beyond the WebKit requirement, including giving Safari preferential access to iOS features compared to competing browsers, imposing limitations on in-app browsing, and prominently displaying Safari as the pre-installed default browser on all iPhones.

Google also came under scrutiny for pre-installing Chrome on Android devices, but the investigation found that Apple's restrictions were more fundamental to market competition. The CMA also flagged the lucrative arrangement where Google pays Apple billions annually to remain the default search engine on iOS devices, noting this deal "significantly reduces their financial incentives to compete."

Both companies have made some concessions since the CMA published its preliminary findings last November. The report acknowledges these improvements have "addressed some, but not all, of the concerns relating to choice architecture," specifically mentioning Apple's December software update that modified how users can change default browsers.

However, to address the remaining issues, the regulator proposed several potential remedies including forcing Apple to allow alternative browser engines on iOS, implementing browser choice screens during device setup (similar to the one found in the EU), and restricting the revenue-sharing search deal between Apple and Google.

These recommendations aren't immediately enforceable, as the CMA is first proceeding with separate investigations to determine whether Apple and Google should be designated with "strategic market status" (SMS) under the UK's Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act. The designation is expected to be decided later this year, and would give the CMA authority to impose stricter regulations on the companies.

If granted SMS designation, Apple and Google could face legally binding conduct requirements and risk substantial penalties — up to 10% of their annual global turnover — for violations.

The cloud gaming portion of the investigation, which had previously raised concerns about Apple's App Store restrictions, concluded that "no further action is necessary" following policy changes Apple made during the course of the investigation.

The UK report follows similar scrutiny from other global regulators, including the European Commission and the United States Department of Justice, which are also examining mobile browser competition.

Article Link: UK Regulator Blames Apple for Stifling Mobile Browser Competition
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: SFjohn
Maybe the CMA should ask why the UK has not contributed to the market in browsers? Why they have just relied on American companies?

Isn’t it about time the UK and Europe did something. Protected start ups, provided better access to finance and allowed alternatives to the USA giants. It’s time to have more European based tech and software firms and end our dependance on the US.
 
Maybe the CMA should ask why the UK has not contributed to the market in browsers? Why they have just relied on American companies?

Isn’t it about time the UK and Europe did something. Protected start ups, provided better access to finance and allowed alternatives to the USA giants. It’s time to have more European based tech and software firms and end our dependance on the US.

I don't completely disagree with you. But check what CPU safari is running on and where that IP came from, or who created the first web browser..
 
Oh no, a manufacturer who makes a product specifies what can run on it. I have 3 different browsers installed on my iPad right now. The EU needs to get on it and build a better mobile device. Nokia used to own the market, come on innovate.
 
I don't completely disagree with you. But check what CPU safari is running on and where that IP came from, or who created the first web browser..
And this is precisely the issue. Many companies and IP originate in Europe and then they get sold off to foreign entities which then make massive profit from the acquired property. Europe needs to hold onto its homegrown tech.
 
And this is precisely the issue. Many companies and IP originate in Europe and then they get sold off to foreign entities which then make massive profit from the acquired property. Europe needs to hold onto its homegrown tech.

It's a finance thing mostly, we just don't have a culture of venture capital here. Someone comes up with something great they are probably going to have to go to the US to get in funded.
 
It's a finance thing mostly, we just don't have a culture of venture capital here. Someone comes up with something great they are probably going to have to go to the US to get in funded.

Venture Capital and IPOs are the hot thing here, but unfortunately turn 99% what they touch into garbage. I get the lure, but it's a crappy situation.

I'm glad that I don't work in tech.
 
Last edited:
And this is precisely the issue. Many companies and IP originate in Europe and then they get sold off to foreign entities which then make massive profit from the acquired property. Europe needs to hold onto its homegrown tech.
Yeah, but it’s much like many other industries… the economy and culture and specialisation in Europe at the minute doesn’t support it.

You can start up, and the talent is there for brilliant ideas and companies but as soon as you grow the US is a way better option. Same with manufacturing, only high end small niche operations can do it in Europe but you want volume and global competitiveness and there’s other parts of the world they’ll never compete with by ignoring.

The EU is setting a dangerous precedent with its fining of big tech companies. Might be a win for Spotify but it sure as hell isn’t encouraging anybody else to set up camp there.

Very disappointed in the UK going after Apple and completely missing Google’s much more detrimental and aggressive actions in the overall browser space.
 
There were good reasons for the WebKit-only requirement when Apple first launched the iPhone and Safari. A woefully underpowered processor that couldn't handle heavy browsing loads, and a desire to keep plug-ins like Flash away from the mobile space in order to preserve battery life and improve user experience. As time went on, mobile phones gained access to more powerful hardware that has generally negated this need. The time probably has come to open up iOS to alternative browser engines, so long as they remain mostly sandboxed from the rest of the system for security.
 
The CMA is simply catching up with other investigations being carried out by the US, EU and other regulators around the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: davide_eu
It's a finance thing mostly, we just don't have a culture of venture capital here. Someone comes up with something great they are probably going to have to go to the US to get in funded.
That’s precisely how Europe should hold onto them, provide the culture, finance and environment here in Europe.

I suspect that the environment in US will become less and less attractive
 
Maybe the CMA should ask why the UK has not contributed to the market in browsers? Why they have just relied on American companies?

Isn’t it about time the UK and Europe did something. Protected start ups, provided better access to finance and allowed alternatives to the USA giants. It’s time to have more European based tech and software firms and end our dependance on the US.
Maybe it’s because it’s so hard to start and keep a company going in the UK and Europe.
 
There were good reasons for the WebKit-only requirement when Apple first launched the iPhone and Safari. A woefully underpowered processor that couldn't handle heavy browsing loads, and a desire to keep plug-ins like Flash away from the mobile space in order to preserve battery life and improve user experience. As time went on, mobile phones gained access to more powerful hardware that has generally negated this need. The time probably has come to open up iOS to alternative browser engines, so long as they remain mostly sandboxed from the rest of the system for security.
No no, the goal was to avoid users to jump out of the walled garden (=a$$le store). Imagine if you could run games in the browser instead of buying them in the store.. do you think jobs would have been happy?!
 
Last edited:
No you don't. You have 3 different front-ends to the same browser engine (Webkit). Those three "different" browsers won't render sites any differently or better than any other, or offer newer web features that aren't present in WebKit.

Best part is that I don’t care, Without something other than Chromium there would be nothing but chromium back end browser engines. The fact that WebKit is the only thing on iDevices is all that has kept different browser engines alive. If not then web designers would just build for chromium and that would be the end of competition.

Kind of how Microsloth Teams has killed off any competing collaboration environments.
 
Oh no, a manufacturer who makes a product specifies what can run on it. I have 3 different browsers installed on my iPad right now. The EU needs to get on it and build a better mobile device. Nokia used to own the market, come on innovate.
All those browsers are the Safari engine with different skins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bousozoku
Stifling competition/innovation is a smoke screen meme. It’s all about homogenizing the experience so everything works the same on very product. It’s the goal every regulating bureaucrat on the planet. We will be assimilated.

And this from a government who is demanding a worldwide back door. I wonder why the U.K. would want “competing” browser engines? So they can insert their back door? Next thing you know they will be outlawing encryption altogether.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.