Sony needs to work on their naming conventions.
Hey now. Let’s be fair. They did change the colors last year. By 2030 I expect another color palette change.Yeah Apple, no hurry – just keep the AirPods Max exactly the same for another five years and only change the port in 2030.
I might be in a minority, but I have a pair of V-Modas from 2016!! I love it. It’s still working with good battery life! (In contrast, most of my friends complain about how quickly their AirPods need to be replaced. Connection/charging/microphone/battery issues.) Apple greenwashes everything, even with products that are designed to be trash in a year or two and are not in any way repairable.My XM3s are still going strong 💪
If you ever replace your Airpods Max's ear cushions, you might want to stick with Apple's, since after the ear cushions on mine began to lose some of their cushioning, causing some unpleasant pressure against my ears and head, I recently bought a pair from GVOEARS whose cushions are just a bit smaller on the inside, and so they touch my ears at a few points around their circumference, while Apple's don't. It's not terrible, but it's sometimes a little annoying. I measured the inside of my used Apple ear cushions at 58.9mm x 38.7mm, and the GVOEARS at 57.6-58.6mm (one is different from the other) x 36.4mm. Also, the cushioning of the GVOEARS cushions is no better than my used Apple cushions, so I didn't gain anything.This is exactly why I switched to Airpods Max. After 8 hours use for work, the XM5's would hurt my ears.
Sound quality was great for both, so I've basically paid a £200 premium to just not have pain at the end of each working day.
I hope Apple hasn't abandoned the AirPods Max. I absolutely love mine, but it's getting a bit frustrating needing a lightning connector just for them. Makes no sense to upgrade to USB-C only, but a new, actually upgraded model I would buy in a heartbeat.
Elsewhere are what look like detachable earpads, similar to AirPods Max
The USB-C model is actually a downgrade. Audio isn't supported through USB-C, but is through Lightning. They removed a feature with the USB-C models. That was my reason for not "upgrading".
I had a M1 that was falling apart (I just use them for air travel) and bought the M4 the other day since. Very nice, and were heavily discounted. 😀
Sony HeadphonePro XM Max StudioSony needs to work on their naming conventions.
Please show me the official documentation where Bluetooth 6.0 actually states it has higher bandwidth and what that bandwidth is.Companies should really try adopting new bluetooth standards faster. Bluetooth 6.0 is out, it has higher bandwidth and positional tracking - something headphones can really benefit from.
It's pretty lame that it takes them years to finally adopt a new standard by the time the next version basically out.
Next AirPod Pro's/Max NEED this.
The Bandwidth-Bit Period Product (BT) is an attribute of a signal that provides information about the relationship between its bandwidth and the duration of symbols.
BT affects the shape and span of the radio pulses that constitute symbols. A higher BT value results in a narrower, squarer pulse and a lower value results in a wider, more rounded pulse shape.
A BT value of 2.0 improves the security of channel sounding with respect to certain types of physical layer attack
The physical layer of Bluetooth LE includes the definition of several permitted configurations known as PHYs. The definition of a PHY includes the modulation scheme used and its parameters such as symbol rate, minimum frequency deviation and Bandwidth-Bit Period Product (BT).
Prior to version 6.0 of the Bluetooth Core Specification, there were three defined PHYs. Their names are LE 1M, LE 2M and LE Coded. The LE Coded PHY is identical to the LE 1M except that packets are subject to additional coding which enables error detection and correction.
A new physical layer configuration called LE 2M 2BT has been introduced in version 6.0. This new PHY may only be used with Bluetooth® Channel Sounding.
I think it is Apple that needs to adapt industry standards to utilize its Lossless or Lossy codecs and stop having us stuck on AAC codec for Bluetooth audio since the entire Apple Music catalogue has gone Lossy/Lossless.
Honestly, the MX devices have awesome bluetooth coupling.sums it up nicely - you could add the cumbersome bluetooth coupling and lack of seamless switching (major benefit of Apple devices)
Apple Lossless is not part of the AAC standards, no.Apple Music's lossy codec is AAC. And Apple's lossless codec (ALAC) is open source and available royalty free, so I'm sure it could be standardised in Bluetooth devices if there was a demand for that.
I once had the XM3 - just one bluetooth device and coupling was always messy. Huge difference to the AirPod MaxHonestly, the MX devices have awesome bluetooth coupling.
Lots of non-Apple ANC headsets these days will allow multiple simultaneous bluetooth connections and just play all of them at the same time with an in-headphone mixer.
I find this better than Apple's implementation to be frank. Simultaneous Bluetooth is almost as fast to connect and there's never any need to "reconnect." With my AirPods, if I'm listening to a podcast and open my laptop, the podcast pauses. If I'm leading a meeting and get an audible notification on my phone, my headphones switch entirely to my phone and don't always switch back rapidly or automatically.
If something does go wrong with an Apple headphone, it's not always easy to fix, either. While fixing an issue with other sets generally boils down to re-pairing them, which takes about 15 seconds. Full disclosure: I had more trouble with my Airpods Max than my current AirPods Pro 2.
An actual lossless headphone standard would need to start with a much higher bandwidth between device and headset -- WiFi or 5G are obvious options -- with much higher power draw. Then we'd probably need to define a different way to deal with reductions in available bandwidth...buffering et al.
Lots of non-Apple ANC headsets these days will allow multiple simultaneous bluetooth connections and just play all of them at the same time with an in-headphone mixer.
I find this better than Apple's implementation to be frank.
Yeah and exactly how much did yours cost in usd and how much better in all measures of sound wispy word vs aisles are they exactly? Any audiophile reviews you can share please??Never a fan of Sony headphones - overpriced plastic garbage - all fake leather - not acceptable for this price range. Prefer my Focal Celestee non-bluetooth headphones - made in France and real leather with aluminium and magnesium frame. Unlike the Sony's they don't look like oversized egg cartons on your ears.
AAC isn't lossy at is peak but rate is it? I doubt it.Apple Music's lossy codec is AAC. And Apple's lossless codec (ALAC) is open source and available royalty free, so I'm sure it could be standardised in Bluetooth devices if there was a demand for that.
AAC isn't lossy at is peak but rate is it? I doubt it.