This is pretty much where I’m at. And I say that as someone with a HomeKit-driven smart home. If my Roborock vacuum pops up in HomeKit one day…cool. But I’m not seeking it out.I still don’t understand how these Smart home standards work.
This is pretty much where I’m at. And I say that as someone with a HomeKit-driven smart home. If my Roborock vacuum pops up in HomeKit one day…cool. But I’m not seeking it out.I still don’t understand how these Smart home standards work.
Gives you something to do this weekend.I’m in the same boat. My Hue Bridge is giving me the option to upgrade, but if I do, it’ll reset all my scenes and settings. Why would I want to do this? I have 46 bulbs in my home!
That would explain my garage light strips resetting in my last house. Nanoleaf (which can be purchased from Apple Store) will probably not have that issue which I have purchased for my next house.Don’t do it. I did, and regret it, as do many others on Reddit. Seriously, just don’t.
If I have a matter fridge and oven, i should be able say Siri, bake a pizza from the freezer and bring me a beer. That is automation i could support.Great. I’ve always wanted to be able to check that my fridge exists without going to the kitchen.
Apple has done a very poor job with HomeKit. However, after a few years and Matter becomes ubiquitous, it won't matter since all these entities like Google Home or HomeKit won't be necessary anymore. For all companies that support Matter, it won't "matter" what home system you're using, And that's a good thing. While I'm not at all surprised Apple was a founding member of Matter, I am still surprised Amazon and Google also were, despite their huge leads over everyone else.Apple already “blew it” in the “smarthome/automation” market, failing to produce a cohesive product. I think they’re too late to catch up now.
Amazon dominates with Alexa — but has somehow managed to make it a colossal financial failure, reportedly losing the company $10 Billion last year alone!
So maybe it’s a Good Thing™ Apple has failed — unless Apple failed AND lost a ton of money. That would be the worst of both worlds. At least Amazon can somehow possibly find a way to monetize its now captive audience.
It’s hard to succeed when you’re the third or fourth name that comes to mind in any product category.
Most markets are a duopoly: Coke and Pepsi, McDonald’s and Burger King, Alexa and Google Home, etc.
Third place is nowhere.
Fourth or fifth place place is “outside the multiverse.”
˙
View attachment 2300756
It the device suports Matter then it can be used be any controller thatsuports matter, like Apple, Samsung, Amazon or Google's. On short Matter is universalI still don’t understand how these Smart home standards work.
So are matter devices just automatically compatible with HomeKit (assuming it’s a device type HomeKit supports) or must the device still explicitly support HomeKit as well?
I’ve just resorted to using my Homebridge server on anything that doesn’t have native homekit support
Apple already “blew it” in the “smarthome/automation” market, failing to produce a cohesive product. I think they’re too late to catch up now.
Amazon dominates with Alexa — but has somehow managed to make it a colossal financial failure, reportedly losing the company $10 Billion last year alone!
So maybe it’s a Good Thing™ Apple has failed — unless Apple failed AND lost a ton of money. That would be the worst of both worlds. At least Amazon can somehow possibly find a way to monetize its now captive audience.
It’s hard to succeed when you’re the third or fourth name that comes to mind in any product category.
Most markets are a duopoly: Coke and Pepsi, McDonald’s and Burger King, Alexa and Google Home, etc.
Third place is nowhere.
Fourth or fifth place place is “outside the multiverse.”
˙
View attachment 2300756
While you are technically correct, most of Amazon's smart home devices rely on web services to operate. If the Internet or device maker goes out of business, your smart home device will become "dumb" or inoperable.
Apple insisted on smart home devices to talk to their Home hub directly, so they can operate even when the vendor goes out of business or without the Internet. Matter also share the same benefit.
What do you mean? Only the consumer-facing companies you listed are like these, "real" security cameras do follow a standard. Once you get into more serious cameras, they become very much interchangeable and yo get many options for storing data other than subscription.None of the security camera manufacturers want to support standard because they want revenue from subscription.
if you have Ring door bell you can just watch live if you don't sign up for subscription.
If you have nest door bell you can watch recordings from last 3 hours.
If you have Arlo and need smart notifications you need to subscribe, i have Arlo i get notifications when a shadow moves.
I wonder how big the market is for people who closely follow these developments and buy new products accordingly. I believe that it is likely small and will stay small for some time as most of these devices are not things most people upgrade often. For instance, in my newly constructed house for which I bought all new medium to high end so called "Smart" appliances in early 2022 there is no chance at all that I will be replacing any of my so-called "Smart" appliances any time soon. If my refrigerator, oven, microswave, dishwasher, clothes washer or clothes dryer live for 20 years then I will be using them for 20 years. I simply do not understand the lifecycle of these standards or how in the long run they really even matter except for maybe for extremely niche (and likely rich) consumers (of which there really are not that many).
How do you mean, exactly? My doorbell is supported by HomeKit secure video and works just fine. I was looking just yesterday at other cameras to replace my Blinks, saw a review of HomeKit compatible cameras.Still no camera support…
Matter doesn’t support cameras. No relation between Matter supporting video and HomeKit Secure Video existing.How do you mean, exactly? My doorbell is supported by HomeKit secure video and works just fine. I was looking just yesterday at other cameras to replace my Blinks, saw a review of HomeKit compatible cameras.
Is there some feature (other than a monthly subscription) you were looking to get?
This argument might be true but the Matter standard literally does not support it. Like even if you wanted to, with Matter as it currently exists you could not.None of the security camera manufacturers want to support standard because they want revenue from subscription.
if you have Ring door bell you can just watch live if you don't sign up for subscription.
If you have nest door bell you can watch recordings from last 3 hours.
If you have Arlo and need smart notifications you need to subscribe, i have Arlo i get notifications when a shadow moves.
Or, if the Amazon delivery driver reports hearing a racist comment from your doorbell, you could have Amazon cancel your account with no proof at all. Then, your smart home becomes useless. Also, the only way to appeal is to log into your account (the one you are locked out of because it is closed), and file it from there. IF you happen to have enough social media clout, you can get enough attention to have them reverse course after a couple of weeks, but we mere mortals are most likely just out of luck.While you are technically correct, most of Amazon's smart home devices rely on web services to operate. If the Internet or device maker goes out of business, your smart home device will become "dumb" or inoperable.
Apple insisted on smart home devices to talk to their Home hub directly, so they can operate even when the vendor goes out of business or without the Internet. Matter also share the same benefit.
Well, my doorbell still works natively in HomeKit. There is no app. Maybe I am not smart enough to have it break. It tells me all the time, "Doorbell has detected someone who might be your wife" and so on.Matter doesn’t support cameras. No relation between Matter supporting video and HomeKit Secure Video existing.
Matter doesn’t support cameras. The whole point of Matter is that you can buy any brand and it should work. Right now, HomeKit is limited in the cameras that support it. Camera support in the Matter spec would open the door to just about every camera out there, whether it is an Alexa, Google Home, or Samsung supporting camera. My current outdoor cameras are Eufy and I’d like to get away from them after their security scandal, but there are few options available that support HSV.How do you mean, exactly? My doorbell is supported by HomeKit secure video and works just fine. I was looking just yesterday at other cameras to replace my Blinks, saw a review of HomeKit compatible cameras.
Is there some feature (other than a monthly subscription) you were looking to get?
I genuinely cannot stand Alexa. Her voice is creepy sounding and she constantly is throwing out irrelevant statements when you ask for things, and the smart screens are barely anything more than ad displays that you for some reason have to pay for. Google is the actual winner, but I stick to HomeKit since I’m pretty entrenched with Apple devices. The only things I’m dissatisfied with are no device with a screen, and Siri being bad at searching the web. Everything else is fine.Alexa is the winner here, it just is. It will be a very tough battle for Apple to ever get that marketshare at this point. They needed to just release basically something like a cheap iPad Air, something with a screen that just sits on a stand.