Hello everyone!
So I'm finally looking at High Sierra at the .1 release level and I'm still not sure whether I should do it.
And to be honest, as a geek, of course I want to just to see the new stuff, which for me very much includes so-called under-the-hood improvements.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
So if I do upgrade, I'm not sure about wanting to convert to APFS. I don't like being forced to convert to it to begin with, but for those of you whose startup disk is an SSD, there's a way to prevent High Sierra from converting to APFS, but it has to be done at the installer level.
Which brings me to one key question about upgrading: Is APFS really noticeably faster? I mean besides making duplicate copies of files locally, which doesn't impress me, as I have no need for that. I do move tons of files around, but mostly on external (non-SSD) hard drives.
Why am I so concerned:
I only recently moved from OS X 10.11.6, which I'd always been very fond of, to 10.12.6 Sierra, because I was forced to due to being on a new 2016 MacBook Pro.
So far, I don't like the little surprises that Sierra has thrown at me, for example when I found out that I had to hack into my OS to be able to launch non-App Store apps, or, as Apple calls them, "unidentified" applications.
The OS X version prior saw Disk Utility deprecated, and Apple's continued efforts to iOS-ify macOS has always been annoying to me. Don't get me wrong, I love how well iOS and macOS play together. It's a great eco-system. But let macOS be macOS.
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
So I'm finally looking at High Sierra at the .1 release level and I'm still not sure whether I should do it.
And to be honest, as a geek, of course I want to just to see the new stuff, which for me very much includes so-called under-the-hood improvements.
So if I do upgrade, I'm not sure about wanting to convert to APFS. I don't like being forced to convert to it to begin with, but for those of you whose startup disk is an SSD, there's a way to prevent High Sierra from converting to APFS, but it has to be done at the installer level.
Which brings me to one key question about upgrading: Is APFS really noticeably faster? I mean besides making duplicate copies of files locally, which doesn't impress me, as I have no need for that. I do move tons of files around, but mostly on external (non-SSD) hard drives.
Why am I so concerned:
I only recently moved from OS X 10.11.6, which I'd always been very fond of, to 10.12.6 Sierra, because I was forced to due to being on a new 2016 MacBook Pro.
So far, I don't like the little surprises that Sierra has thrown at me, for example when I found out that I had to hack into my OS to be able to launch non-App Store apps, or, as Apple calls them, "unidentified" applications.
The OS X version prior saw Disk Utility deprecated, and Apple's continued efforts to iOS-ify macOS has always been annoying to me. Don't get me wrong, I love how well iOS and macOS play together. It's a great eco-system. But let macOS be macOS.
Any advice is greatly appreciated.