I had problems downloading a few songs on my iPhone and iPad. I thought it was just me, but looks like it is more widespread than I initially imagined.
yeah i thought the same, glad to know I'm not the only one. hope they fix this soon
I had problems downloading a few songs on my iPhone and iPad. I thought it was just me, but looks like it is more widespread than I initially imagined.
This is a Windows problem only.
Buy a Mac.
To put shortly, no, but anything that's sold in the iTunes Music store in your country will pretty much be matched. The only times I've ran into issues was when the time of the song in my library didn't match the time of the song in the store. That was usually solved by going under "Get Info" and adjusting the time to what the store has.
But other than that, if you have it and the store has it, there's a pretty high chance it'll be matched.
I'm hoping this "cloud" stuff blows away in the next few years as memory becomes cheaper to put into devices so we can store whatever we need. Cloud has two main purposes: help limited-memory devices be able to have greater function and to keep control of copyrighted property. The control of copyrighted property can become overbearing if they wish it.
Now and then it happens even to the best. But even Apple's worst imperfections are something others would give an arm and a leg (or a bad Android tablet) for.
Wrong forum?
Not true. There are far more issues than that. Further more, if your copy of the track is 4:09, and iTunes has it as 4:10...you're screwed. You can't change the stop time to be longer than the track.
Possibly throwing the song into garage band and adding a second, the re tagging everything perfectly MIGHT work, but not even close to being worth the effort.
Edit: Nope, that doesn't work either.
I am not new to computers or Apple products (I have used and owned them for twenty years). At home, I have an extensive network for Apple, TiVo, and FiOS equipment. Not meant as any kind of a boast, just part of the geek in me as well as I enjoy the conveniences and benefits a "wired home" provides. Having said that, why would I ever want to participate in Apple's iCloud? Maybe the difference is that only about .05% of my music was purchased from iTunes. As desired, I can put my music on my i "pods", "pad", and "phone" as needed. The shuffle holds 700 songs, more than I can care about when going out for some exercise. Along comes the iCloud, placing Apple, as a single point failure, in the middle of all participants' use of their music, sucking up bandwidth to stream and re-stream that music over and over again. So, you buy the music, you pay to host it on the iCloud, and you pay for the use of bandwidth for them to stream it back to you. I wrestle now with controlling my sarcasm. Sorry. But, I did an internet search on "cloud" computing and the iCloud and I could not find a convincing reason to participate and thus be engaged in issues as this message thread demonstrates.
Whoops, forgot I threw in a step: I burned the new shortened songs onto a CD to get it permanently to that time, and reimported it into iTunes and they mostly matched. Some took a couple times of deleting it from iCloud, creating a new AAC version, then send it back to iCloud.
This system is nowhere near perfected as it's very rough in certain spots, but in someways, it works fine, but this instance of where it's not pulling uploaded songs from the server is where I'm noticing it's starting to fail. Still think that this shouldn't of gone out of the dev stage yet.
But yet the $25 a year already saved me well over $100 worth of songs just by matching them with the store quality versions. Can't complain about that!
I'm hoping this "cloud" stuff blows away in the next few years as memory becomes cheaper to put into devices so we can store whatever we need. Cloud has two main purposes: help limited-memory devices be able to have greater function and to keep control of copyrighted property. The control of copyrighted property can become overbearing if they wish it.
If it's happening on Macs also then the issue is probably with Microsoft Azure. Apple uses that for iCloud.
Nope, right forum. My posts were relevant to the actual topic, .
Its safe to say this has been a really bad week for Apple.
Lion upgrade that breaks a lot of machines.
Snow Leopard upgrade that breaks a lot of software.
A lot of coverage on serious iMessenger glitch.
Patent losses preventing sales of certain devices in Germany.
Patent losses that may affect email and icloud ability in Germany.
And Match playbreak breaking down.
Most of these are the sort of issues that would basically be the 'weekly thing' - but now they've all decided to show up all at once in the span of a mere two days.
These were in Beta for weeks and/or months, shouldn't the developers be catching some of these issues? I'm not trying to sound like I'm attacking them but isn't that the whole point of releasing Betas?
. Having said that, why would I ever want to participate in Apple's iCloud? Maybe the difference is that only about .05% of my music was purchased from iTunes.
If it's happening on Macs also then the issue is probably with Microsoft Azure. Apple uses that for iCloud.
how is using software that is not iTunes on a non apple device remotely relevant.
It's not. Nor is basically saying 'my android has no issues, you should switch so you can have no issues too' helpful.
But are any of these things really major when you look at the numbers. Are we talking many thousands affected or just a very vocal couple of hundred. Then compare this to say the Xbox fiasco where something like 70% of all units broke down in the first six months, only to be replaced with another machine equally likely to breakdown because Microsoft never bothered to sort out the issue.
???
Microsoft extended the warranty of affected products to three years and have fixed the issue.
But that was a hardware issue, that caused catastrophic failure of the physical hardware. This isn't the case.
Yeah, it doesn't show up in any search engine unless you're using a Pentium II. And as we all know, anything created more than six months ago is garbage that can't possibly work, especially if it was made by a company other than Apple! But really, it was a nice comeback. You should feel proud.Audiogalaxy? Forgot what that was, and had to boot up my Pentium II and pull up Webcrawler to remember.
Sorry, Charlie. It appears you misunderstood, but I can help you get back on track:how is using software that is not iTunes on a non apple device remotely relevant.
It's not. Nor is basically saying 'my android has no issues, you should switch so you can have no issues too' helpful.
Originally Posted by daneoni:
...and the glitches just keep coming and coming.
Now this is where I mention the lack of imperfections with my Android while using Audiogalaxy. If you connect the dots here, you can see that I'm refuting LTD's assertion that if this were the worst problem Apple faced, others would give an arm, leg or a "bad Android" device to have the same service.Originally posted by *LTD*:
Now and then it happens even to the best. But even Apple's worst imperfections are something others would give an arm and a leg (or a bad Android tablet) for.
Originally posted by wonderspark:
So far, no problems on my Android streaming Audiogalaxy. Maybe those glitches are on the road ahead somewhere.
To put shortly, no, but anything that's sold in the iTunes Music store in your country will pretty much be matched. The only times I've ran into issues was when the time of the song in my library didn't match the time of the song in the store. That was usually solved by going under "Get Info" and adjusting the time to what the store has.
But other than that, if you have it and the store has it, there's a pretty high chance it'll be matched.
While that's a sweet little thought, these issues could just as easily still happen if he was alive. After all, he was the bossman during the whole "lets launch the iPhone 3g, iPhone OS 2 AND mobileme at the same time" nonsense.
The picture for this story made me sad in remembering there won't be another Apple event with Jobs and that his last keynote was for something that is somewhat forgettable in Apple's history.![]()
Quite likely, yes. The number of 360s sold in the initial months were a few million at best (3 million?). Furthermore, widespread QA failures are considered much more severe than concentrated ones. Slipups happen, all of these can happen once in a while. But multiple issues at once is bad news, even if the affected consumer base is much smaller - because it heavily suggests management or direction problems, which could easily propagate into other project. A single slipup, even if it turns out to be serious case - generally only impairs that specific project or product.But are any of these things really major when you look at the numbers.